The effect of central corneal thickness on tonometry;Einfluss der hornhautdicke auf die tonometrie

Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde

Volumn 228, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 114-117

  Bohm A G ^a  

^a Elblandklinikum Radebeul   (Germany)

Author keywords

cornea; glaucoma; tonometry

Indexed keywords

CORNEA THICKNESS; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MEASUREMENT ERROR; NOMOGRAM; REVIEW; RISK FACTOR; TONOMETER; TONOMETRY;

ARTIFACTS; CORNEA; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MANOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 79851513940     PISSN: 00232165     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1246039     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B et al. Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch Ophthalmol 2002; 120: 1268-1279 (Pubitemid 36105431)
2. Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2002; 120: 714-720; discussion 829-730
3. Sporl E, Terai N, Haustein M et al. Biomechanical condition of the cornea as a new indicator for pathological and structural changes. Ophthalmologe 2009; 106: 512-520
4. Goldmann H, Schmidt T. Applanation tonometry. Ophthalmologica 1957; 134: 221-242
5. Kotecha A, White E, Schlottmann PG et al. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers. Ophthalmology 2010; 117: 730-737
6. Tonnu PA, Ho T, Newson T et al. The influence of central corneal thickness and age on intraocular pressure measured by pneumotonometry, non-contact tonometry, the Tono-Pen XL, and Goldmann applanation tonometry. The British journal of ophthalmology 2005; 89: 851-854 (Pubitemid 40904808)
7. Ehlers N, Bramsen T, Sperling S. Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol 1975; 53: 34-43
8. Kohlhaas M, Boehm AG, Spoerl E et al. Effect of central corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and axial length on applanation tonometry. Arch Ophthalmol 2006; 124: 471-476
9. Kanngiesser HE, Kniestedt C, Robert YC. Dynamic contour tonometry: presentation of a new tonometer. Journal of glaucoma 2005; 14: 344-350 (Pubitemid 41383326)
10. Kotecha A, White ET, Shewry JM et al. The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry. The British journal of ophthalmology 2005; 89: 1572-1575 (Pubitemid 41729900)
11. Schneider E, Grehn F. Intraocular pressure measurement-comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry. Journal of glaucoma 2006; 15: 2-6 (Pubitemid 43068411)
12. Hager A, Loge K, Schroeder B et al. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes. Journal of glaucoma 2008; 17: 361-365
13. Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Vico E et al. Effect of corneal thickness on dynamic contour, rebound, and goldmann tonometry. Ophthalmology 2006; 113: 2156-2162 (Pubitemid 44838915)
14. Boehm AG, Weber A, Pillunat LE et al. Dynamic contour tonometry in comparison to intracameral IOPmeasurements. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science 2008; 49: 2472-2477
15. Grolman B. A new tonometer system. American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry 1972; 49: 646-660
16. Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. Journal of cataract and refractive surgery 2005; 31: 156-162 (Pubitemid 40260703)
17. Kotecha A, Elsheikh A, Roberts CR et al. Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science 2006; 47: 5337-5347 (Pubitemid 46729154)
18. Medeiros FA,Weinreb RN. Evaluation of the influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurements using the ocular response analyzer. Journal of glaucoma 2006; 15: 364-370
19. Kontiola A, Puska P. Measuring intraocular pressure with the Pulsair 3000 and Rebound tonometers in elderly patients without an anesthetic. Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie 2004; 242: 3-7 (Pubitemid 38208277)
20. Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Castillo A et al. Reproducibility and clinical evaluation of rebound tonometry. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science 2005; 46: 4578-4580 (Pubitemid 44264556)
21. van der Jagt LH, Jansonius NM. Three portable tonometers, the TGDc-01, the ICARE and the Tonopen XL, compared with each other and with Goldmann applanation tonometry*. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2005; 25: 429-435 (Pubitemid 41710977)
22. Jorge JM, Gonzalez-Meijome JM, Queiros A et al. Correlations between corneal biomechanical properties measured with the ocular response analyzer and ICare rebound tonometry. Journal of glaucoma 2008; 17: 442-448
23. Orssengo GJ, Pye DC. Determination of the true intraocular pressure and modulus of elasticity of the human cornea in vivo. Bulletin of Mathemetical Biology 1999; 61: 551-572 (Pubitemid 29274620)
24. Liu J, Roberts CJ. Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis. Journal of cataract and refractive surgery 2005; 31: 146-155 (Pubitemid 40260702)
25. Svedberg H, Chen E, Hamberg-Nystrom H. Changes in corneal thickness and curvature after different excimer laser photorefractive procedures and their impact on intraocular pressure measurements. Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie 2005; 243: 1218-1220 (Pubitemid 43055185)
26. Whitacre MM, Stein R. Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers. Surv Ophthalmol 1993; 38: 1-30 (Pubitemid 23234285)