Activating positive affective experiences in the classroom: " Nice to have" or something more?

Learning and Instruction

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 452-466

  Buff, Alex ^a   Reusser, Kurt ^a   Rakoczy, Katrin ^b   Pauli, Christine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b GERMAN INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Achievement; Affective experiences; Autonomy support; Mathematics instruction; Motivation

Indexed keywords

EID: 79751535828     PISSN: 09594752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.07.008     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Aiken L.S., West S.G. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions 1991, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
2. Ainley M., Corrigan M., Richardson N. Students, tasks and emotions: identifying the contribution of emotions to students' reading of popular culture and popular science texts. Learning and Instruction 2005, 15:433-447.
3. Assor A., Kaplan H., Roth G. Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviours predicting students' engagement in schoolwork. British Journal of Educational Psychology 2002, 72:261-278.
4. Baron R.M., Kenny D.A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1986, 51:1173-1182.
5. Black A.E., Deci E.L. The effects of instructors' autonomy support and students' autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: a self-determination theory perspective. Science Education 2000, 84:740-756.
6. Boekaerts M. Context sensitivity: activated motivational beliefs, current concerns and emotional arousal. Motivation in learning contexts: Theoretical advances and methodological implications 2001, 17-31. Pergamon, Amsterdam. S. Volet, S. Järvelä (Eds.).
7. Boekaerts M. Understanding students' affective processes in the classroom. Emotion in education 2007, 37-56. Elsevier, Amsterdam. P.A. Schutz, R. Pekrun (Eds.).
8. Brennan R.L. Generalizability theory 2001, Springer, New York.
9. Clausen M. Unterrichtsqualität: Eine Frage der Perspektive? 2002, Waxmann, Münster, Germany.
10. Clausen M., Reusser K., Klieme E. Unterrichtsqualität auf der Basis hoch-inferenter Unterrichtsbeurteilungen: Ein instruktionspsychologischer Vergleich zwischen Deutschland und der deutschsprachigen Schweiz. Unterrichtswissenschaft 2003, 31:122-141.
11. Cohen J., Cohen P., West S.G., Aiken L.S. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences 2003, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. 3rd ed.
12. Cronbach L.J. Remarking the concept of aptitude: Extending the legacy of Richard E. Snow 2002, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
13. Deci E.L., Vallerand R.J., Pelletier L.G., Ryan R.M. Motivation and education: the self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist 1991, 26:325-346.
14. Eccles J.S. Subjective task value and the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. Handbook of competence and motivation 2005, 105-121. Guilford, New York. A.J. Elliot, C.S. Dweck (Eds.).
15. Eccles J.S., Barber B.L., Updegraff K., O'Brien K.M. An expectancy-value model of achievement choices: the role of ability self-concepts, perceived task utility and interest in predicting activity choice and course enrollment. Interest and learning 1998, 267-279. Leibnitz-Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften (IPN), Kiel, Germany. L. Hoffmann, A. Krapp, K.A. Renninger, J. Baumert (Eds.).
16. Fredricks J.A., Eccles J.S. Children's competence and value beliefs from childhood through adolescence: growth trajectories in two male-sex-typed domains. Developmental Psychology 2002, 4:519-533.
17. Goetz T., Frenzel A.C., Haag L. Ursachen von Langeweile im Unterricht. Empirische Pädagogik 2006, 20:113-134.
18. Goetz T., Frenzel A.C., Hall N.C., Pekrun R. Antecedents of academic emotions: testing the internal/external frame of reference model for academic enjoyment. Contemporary Educational Psychology 2008, 33:9-33.
19. Goetz T., Pekrun R., Hall N., Haag L. Academic emotions from a social-cognitive perspective: antecedents and domain specificity of students' affect in the context of Latin instruction. British Journal of Educational Psychology 2006, 76:289-308.
20. Hugener I., Pauli C., Reusser K. Videoanalysen. Dokumentation der Erhebungs- und Auswertungsinstrumente zur schweizerisch-deutschen Videostudie ″ Unterrichtsqualität, Lernverhalten und mathematisches Verständnis″ Materialien zur Bildungsforschung 2006, Band 15. [Video analysis], GFPF, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. E. Klieme, C. Pauli, K. Reusser (Eds.).
21. Jullien S. Elterliches Engagement und Lern- und Leistungsemotionen 2006, Herbert Utz, München, Germany.
22. Kalyuga S. Expertise reversal effect and its implications for learner-tailored instruction. Educational Psychology Review 2007, 19:509-539.
23. Klieme E., Pauli C., Reusser K. The Pythagoras study. The power of video studies in investigating teaching and learning in the classroom 2009, 137-160. Waxmann, Münster, Germany. T. Janik, T. Seidel (Eds.).
24. Krapp A. Entwicklung und Förderung von Interessen im Unterricht. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht 1998, 44:185-201.
25. Krapp A. Basic needs and the development of interest and intrinsic motivational orientations. Learning and Instructions 2005, 15:381-395.
26. Krull J.L., MacKinnon D.P. Multilevel modelling of individual and group level mediated effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research 2001, 36:249-277.
27. Linnenbrink E.A. Emotion research in education: theoretical and methodological perspectives on the integration of affect, motivation, and cognition. Educational Psychology Review 2006, 18:307-314.
28. Linnenbrink E.A., Pintrich P.R. Role of affect in cognitive processing in academic contexts. Motivation, emotion and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development 2004, 57-87. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. D. Dai, R. Sternberg (Eds.).
29. Lipowsky F., Drollinger-Vetter B., Hartig J., Klieme E. Leistungstests. Dokumentation der Erhebungs- und Auswertungsinstrumente zur schweizerisch-deutschen Videostudie ″ Unterrichtsqualität, Lernverhalten und mathematisches Verständnis″ Materialien zur Bildungsforschung 2006, Band 14. [Achievement tests], GFPF, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. E. Klieme, C. Pauli, K. Reusser (Eds.).
30. Lipowsky F., Rakoczy K., Pauli C., Drollinger-Vetter B., Klieme E., Reusser K. Quality of geometry instruction and its short-term impact on students' understanding of Pythagorean theorem. Learning and Instruction 2009, 19:527-537.
31. Marsh, H. W., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2004 July). Academic self-concept, interest, grades and standardized test scores: Reciprocal effects models of causal ordering. Paper presented at the 3rd International biennial SELF Research Conference, Berlin, Germany.
32. Massa L.J., Mayer R.E. Testing the ATI hypothesis: should multimedia instruction accommodate verbalizer-visualizer cognitive style?. Learning and Individual Differences 2006, 16:321-335.
33. Meyer D.K., Turner J.C. Scaffolding emotions in classrooms. Emotion in education 2007, 243-258. Elsevier, Amsterdam. P.A. Schutz, R. Pekrun (Eds.).
34. Op't Eynde P., De Corte E., Verschaffel L. ″ What to learn from what to feel?″: the role of students' emotions in the mathematics classroom. Motivation in learning contexts: Theoretical advances and methodological implications 2001, 149-167. Pergamon, Amsterdam. S. Volet, S. Järvelä (Eds.).
35. Op't Eynde P., De Corte E., Verschaffel L. Students' emotions: a key component of self-regulated learning?. Emotion in education 2007, 185-204. Elsevier, Amsterdam. P.A. Schutz, R. Pekrun (Eds.).
36. Pekrun R. The impact of emotions on learning and achievement: towards a theory of cognitive/motivational mediators. Applied Psychology: An International Review 1992, 41:359-376.
37. Pekrun R. Schüleremotionen und ihre Förderung: Ein blinder Fleck der Unterrichtsforschung. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht 1998, 44:230-248.
38. Pekrun R. Progress and open problems in educational emotion research. Learning and Instruction 2005, 15:497-506.
39. Pekrun R. The control-value theory of achievement emotions: assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review 2006, 18:315-341.
40. Pekrun R., Frenzel A.C., Goetz T., Perry R.P. The control-value theory of achievement emotions: an integrative approach to emotions in education. Emotion in education 2007, 13-36. Elsevier, Amsterdam. P.A. Schutz, R. Pekrun (Eds.).
41. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Jullien, S., Zirngibel, A., vom Hofe, R., & Perry, R. P. (2004, April). Emotions, self-regulated learning, and academic achievement: Testing a model of reciprocal causation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, USA.
42. Pekrun R., Goetz T., Titz W., Perry R.P. Academic emotions in students' self-regulated learning and achievement: a program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist 2002, 37:91-105.
43. Pekrun R., Goetz T., Titz W., Perry R.P. Positive emotions in education. Beyond coping: Meeting goals, visions, and challenges 2002, 149-173. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. E. Frydenberg (Ed.).
44. Pekrun R., Hofmann Lern- und Leistungsemotionen: Erste Befunde eines Forschungsprogramms. Emotion, Motivation und Leistung 1999, 248-267. Hogrefe, Göttingen, Germany. M. Jerusalem, R. Pekrun (Eds.).
45. Pekrun R., Schutz P.A. Where do we go from here? Implications and future directions for inquiry on emotions in education. Emotion in education 2007, 313-331. Elsevier, Amsterdam. P.A. Schutz, R. Pekrun (Eds.).
46. Pintrich P.R., Schunk D.H. Motivation in education: Theory, research and application 2002, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 2nd ed.
47. Prenzel M., Duit R., Euler M., Lehrke M., Seidel T. Erhebungs- und Auswertungsverfahren des DFG-Projekts ″ Lehr-Lern-Prozesse im Physikunterricht - eine Videostudie 2001, Leibnitz-Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften (IPN), Kiel, Germany.
48. Prenzel M., Kirsten A., Dengler P., Ettle R., Beer T. Selbstbestimmt motiviertes und interessiertes Lernen in der kaufmännischen Erstausbildung. Zeitschrift für Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik, Beiheft 1996, 13:108-127.
49. Rakoczy K., Buff A., Lipowsky F. Befragungsinstrumente. Dokumentation der Erhebungs- und Auswertungsinstrumente zur schweizerisch-deutschen Videostudie ″ Unterrichtsqualität, Lernverhalten und mathematisches Verständnis″ Materialien zur Bildungsforschung 2005, Band 13. [Questionnaires], GFPF, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. E. Klieme, C. Pauli, K. Reusser (Eds.).
50. Rakoczy K., Klieme E., Buergermeister A., Harks B. The interplay between student evaluation and instruction. Zeitschrift für Psychologie 2008, 216:111-124.
51. Rakoczy K., Klieme E., Drollinger-Vetter B., Lipowsky F., Pauli C., Reusser K. Structure as a quality feature in mathematics instruction. Cognitive and motivational effects of a structured organisation of the learning environment vs. a structured presentation of learning content. Studies on the educational quality of schools. The final report on the DFG Priority Programme 2007, 100-120. Waxmann, Münster, Germany. M. Prenzel (Ed.).
52. Rakoczy K., Pauli C. Hoch inferentes Rating: Beurteilung der Qualität unterrichtlicher Prozesse. Dokumentation der Erhebungs- und Auswertungsinstrumente zur schweizerisch-deutschen Videostudie ″ Unterrichtsqualität, Lernverhalten und mathematisches Verständnis″ Materialien zur Bildungsforschung 2006, Band 15:206-235. [High-inference rating. Assessment of instructional quality], GFPF, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. E. Klieme, C. Pauli, K. Reusser (Eds.).
53. Raudenbush S., Bryk A., Cheong Y.F., Congdon R., du Toit M. HLM 6: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modelling 2004, Scientific Software International Inc., Lincolnwood, IL.
54. Raudenbush S.W., Bryk A.S. Hierarchical linear models. Applications and data analysis methods 2002, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. 2nd ed.
55. Reeve J. Self-determination theory applied to educational settings. Handbook of self-determination research 2002, 183-203. The University of Rochester Press, Rocherster, NY. E.L. Deci, R.M. Ryan (Eds.).
56. Rheinberg F., Vollmeyer R., Burns B.D. FAM: Ein Fragebogen zur Erfassung aktueller Motivation in Lern- und Leistungssituationen. Diagnostica 2001, 47:57-66.
57. Ruthig J.C., Perry R.P., Hladkyj S., Hall N.C., Pekrun R., Chipperfield J.G. Perceived control and emotions: interactive effects on performance in achievement settings. Social Psychology of Education 2008, 11:161-180.
58. Ryan M.R., Connell J.P. Perceived locus of causality and internalization: examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1989, 57:749-761.
59. Ryan R., Deci E.L. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist 2000, 55:68-78.
60. Sansone C., Thoman D.B. Does what we feel affect what we learn? Some answers and new questions. Learning and Instruction 2005, 15:507-515.
61. Schutz P.A., Hong J.Y., Cross D.I., Osbon J.N. Reflections on investigating emotion in educational activity settings. Educational Psychology Review 2006, 18:343-360.
62. Schutz P.A., Lanehart S.L. Introduction: emotions in education. Educational Psychologist 2002, 37:67-68.
63. Seidel T., Shavelson R.J. Teaching effectiveness research in the past decade: the role of theory and research design in disentangling meta-analysis results. Review of Educational Research 2007, 77:454-499.
64. Skinner E. A guide to constructs of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1996, 3:549-570.
65. Skinner E.A., Chapman M., Baltes P.B. Control, means-ends, and agency beliefs: a new conceptualization and it's measurement during childhood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1988, 54:117-133.
66. Snijders T.A.B., Bosker R.J. Multilevel analysis 2002, Sage, London.
67. Snow R.E. Aptitude treatment interaction as a framework for research on individual differences in learning. Learning and individual differences 1989, 13-59. Freeman, New York. P.L. Ackerman, R.J. Sternberg, R. Glaser (Eds.).
68. Snow R.E. Teaching: aptitude-treatment interaction model. International encyclopedia of developmental and instructional psychology 1996, 670-674. Elsevier, Oxford, UK. E. De Corte, F.E. Weinert (Eds.).
69. Stark R., Gruber H., Mandel H. Motivationale und kognitive Passungsprozesse beim komplexen situierten Lernen. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht 1998, 45:202-215.
70. Stefanou C.R., Perencevich K.C., DiCinto M., Turner J.C. Suporting autonomy in the classroom: ways teachers encourage student decision making and ownership. Educational Psychologist 2004, 39:97-110.
71. Sternberg R.J., Grigorenko E.L., Ferrari M., Clinkenbeard P. A triarchic analysis of an aptitude-treatment interaction. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 1999, 15:3-13.
72. Taylor A.B., MacKinnon D.P., Tein J.-Y. Tests of the three-path mediated effect. Organizational Research Methods 2008, 11:241-269.
73. Titz W. Emotionen von Studierenden in Lernsituationen 2001, Waxmann, Münster, Germany.
74. Trautwein U., Lüdtke O., Schnyder I., Niggli A. Predicting homework effort: support for a domain-specific, multilevel homework model. Journal of Educational Psychology 2006, 98:438-456.
75. Turner J.C. A classroom perspective on the principle of moderate challenge in mathematics. Journal of Educational Research 2004, 97(6):311-318.
76. Van Calster K., Lens W., Nuttin J.R. Affective attitude toward the personal future: impact on motivation in high school boys. American Journal of Psychology 1987, 100:1-13.
77. Veermans M., Järvelä S. Generalized achievement goals and situational coping in inquiry learning. Instructional Science 2004, 32:269-291.
78. Wigfield A., Eccles J.S. Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology 2000, 25:68-81.
79. Wirtz M., Caspar F. Beurteilerübereinstimmung und Beurteilerreliabilität. Methoden zur Bestimmung und Verbesserung der Zuverlässigkeit von Einschätzungen mittels Kategoriensystemen und Ratingskalen 2002, Hogrefe, Göttingen, Germany.
80. Wu, M. L. (1997). The development and application of fit test for use with generalised item response model. Unpublished Master thesis. University of Melbourne, Australia.
81. Wu M.L., Adams R.J., Wilson M.R. ConQuest: Multi-aspect test software 1997, [computer software], Australian Council for Educational Research, Camberwell, Victoria.
82. Ysewijn P. GT-Programm für Generalisierbarkeitsstudien 1997, [computer software], Institut de Recherche et de Documentation Pédagogique, Neuchâchtel, Switzerland.