A Randomized, Prospective Study of 3 Minimally Invasive Surgical Approaches in Total Hip Arthroplasty. Comprehensive Gait Analysis

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 23, Issue 6 SUPPL., 2008, Pages 68-73

  Meneghini, R Michael ^a   Smits, Shelly A ^a   Swinford, Rachel R ^b   Bahamonde, Rafael E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT HEALTH CENTER   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

gait analysis; hip arthroplasty; hip replacement; minimally invasive; surgical approach

Indexed keywords

ABDUCTION; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; GAIT; HUMAN; LEG; LEG MOVEMENT; LIMB; LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY; MUSCLE INJURY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RIGIDITY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; VELOCITY; WALKING SPEED;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; GAIT; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE;

EID: 49549121621     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.05.014     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Berry D.J., et al. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Development, early results, and a critical analysis. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Orthopaedic Association, Charleston, South Carolina, USA, June 14, 2003. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A (2003) 2235
2. Berger R.A., et al. Rapid rehabilitation and recovery with minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2004) 239
3. Archibeck M.J., and White Jr. R.E. Learning curve for the two-incision total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2004) 232
4. Pagnano M.W., et al. Two-incision THA had modest outcomes and some substantial complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res 441 (2005) 86
5. Dorr L.D., et al. Psychologic reasons for patients preferring minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 458 (2007) 94
6. Mardones R., et al. The Frank Stinchfield Award: muscle damage after total hip arthroplasty done with the two-incision and mini-posterior techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res 441 (2005) 63
7. Meneghini R.M., et al. Muscle damage during MIS total hip arthroplasty: Smith-Petersen versus posterior approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 453 (2006) 293
8. Hodge W.A., Andriacchi T.P., and Galante J.O. A relationship between stem orientation and function following total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 6 (1991) 229
9. Long W.T., et al. Functional recovery of noncemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1993) 73
10. Madsen M.S., et al. The effect of total hip arthroplasty surgical approach on gait. J Orthop Res 22 (2004) 44
11. McCrory J.L., White S.C., and Lifeso R.M. Vertical ground reaction forces: objective measures of gait following hip arthroplasty. Gait Posture 14 (2001) 104
12. Murray M.P., Brewer B.J., and Zuege R.C. Kinesiologic measurements of functional performance before and after McKee-Farrar total hip replacement. A study of thirty patients with rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, or avascular necrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Am 54 (1972) 237
13. Perron M., et al. Three-dimensional gait analysis in women with a total hip arthroplasty. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 15 (2000) 504
14. Stauffer R.N., Smidt G.L., and Wadsworth J.B. Clinical and biomechanical analysis of gait following Charnley total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1974) 70
15. Bennett D., et al. Comparison of gait kinematics in patients receiving minimally invasive and traditional hip replacement surgery: a prospective blinded study. Gait Posture 23 (2006) 374
16. Dorr L.D., et al. Early pain relief and function after posterior minimally invasive and conventional total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, blinded study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89 (2007) 1153
17. Pagnano M.W., et al. No benefit of the two-incision technique over the mini-posterior total hip arthroplasty: A comprehensive gait analysis and strength testing study. American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons 17th Annual Meeting (2006) 301 Dallas (Tex)
18. Berger R.A., and Duwelius P.J. The two-incision minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: technique and results. Orthop Clin North Am 35 (2004) 163
19. Pagnano M.W., et al. Patients preferred a mini-posterior THA to a contralateral two-incision THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 453 (2006) 156
20. Berger R.A. Mini-incision total hip replacement using an anterolateral approach: technique and results. Orthop Clin North Am 35 (2004) 143
21. Moisio K.C., et al. Normalization of joint moments during gait: a comparison of two techniques. J Biomech 36 (2003) 599
22. Bennett D., et al. Comparison of immediate postoperative walking ability in patients receiving minimally invasive and standard-incision hip arthroplasty: a prospective blinded study. J Arthroplasty 22 (2007) 490
23. Berger R.A. Total hip arthroplasty using the minimally invasive two-incision approach. Clin Orthop (2003) 232
24. Berger R.A. The technique of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty using the two-incision approach. Instr Course Lect 53 (2004) 149