Comparison of the 2-Incision and Mini-Incision Posterior Total Hip Arthroplasty Technique. A Retrospective Match-Pair Controlled Study

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 48-56

  Duwelius, Paul J ^a   Burkhart, Robert L ^a   Hayhurst, John O ^a   Moller, Hans ^a   Butler, Jay B V ^a  

^a PROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

match pair outcome study; minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty; total hip arthroplasty functional outcome

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR NECK FRACTURE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL OUTCOMES STUDY SLEEP SCALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARESTHESIA; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; SHORT FORM 36; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL PATIENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; WESTERN ONTARIO AND MCMASTER OSTEOARTHRITIS INDEX; WOUND DRAINAGE; WOUND INFECTION;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MATCHED-PAIR ANALYSIS; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33845737942     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.09.012     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Berry D.J., Berger R.J., Callaghan J.J., et al. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: development, early results, and a critical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg 85-A (2003) 2235
2. Sculco T.P. Is smaller necessarily better?. Am J Orthop 32 (2003) 169
3. White R.A., and Archibech M.J. Learning curve for the minimally invasive two-incision total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 429 (2004) 232
4. Woolson S.T., Mow C.S., Syquia J.F., et al. Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a standard incision or a mini incision. J Bone Joint Surg 86-A (2004) 2235
5. Digioia A.M., Plakeychuk A.Y., Levison T.J., et al. Mini-incision technique for total hip arthroplasty with navigation. J Arthroplasty 18 (2003) 123
6. Hartzband M.A. Posterolateral minimal incision for total hip replacement: technique and early results. Orthop Clin North Am 35 (2004) 131
7. Light T.R., and Keggi K.J. Anterior approach to hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 152 (1980) 255
8. Sculco T.P., and Jordan L.C. The mini incision approach to total hip arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 53 (2004) 141
9. Ogonda L., Wilson R., Archbold P., et al. A minimal-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty does not improve early postoperative outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg 87-A (2005) 701
10. Sculco T.P. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: in the affirmative. J Arthroplasty 19 4 Supp 1 (2004) 78
11. Berger R.A. The technique of minimally invasive hip surgery using the two-incision approach. Instr Course Lect 53 (2004) 149
12. Berger R.A., and Duwelius P.J. Orthop Clin North Am 35 (2004) 163
13. Berger R.A. Total hip arthroplasty using the minimally invasive two-incision approach. Clin Orthop (2003) 232
14. Phillips C.B., Barrett J.A., Losina E., et al. Incidence rates of dislocation, pulmonary embolism, and deep infection during the first 6 months after elective total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A (2003) 20
15. Dorr L.D. The mini incision hip: building a ship in a bottle. Orthopedics 2 (2004) 192
16. Waldman B.J. Minimally invasive total hip replacement and perioperative management: early experience. J South Orthop Assoc 25 (2002) 1031
17. Wenz J.F., Gurkan L., and Jibodh S.R. Mini-incision total hip arthroplasty: a comparative assessment of perioperative outcomes. Orthopaedics 25 (2002) 1031
18. Harris W.H. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg S1-A (1969) 737
19. Armitage P., Berry G., and Matthews J.N.S. Statistical methods in medical research. 4th ed. (2002), Malden, Blackwell 472
20. Agency for Health Research and Quality. HCUPnet, 2002. Nationwide Inpatient Sample. http://hcup.ahrq.gov/HCUPnet.asp Accessed July 26, 2004
21. McPherson EJ, Dorr LD, Gruen TA, et al. Hydroxyapatite-Coated Proximal Ingrowth Femoral Stems. A Match-Pair Controlled Study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. # 135:223-230.
22. Min B., Longjohn D., Dorr L.D., et al. Radiographic comparison of diaphyseal grit blasted with smooth surface stems by matched pair analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 381 (2000)
23. Ranawat C., Beaver W.B., Sharrock N.E., et al. Effect of hypotensive epidural anesthesia on acetabular cement-bone fixation in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 73-B (1991) 779
24. Rothman R.H., Hozack W.J., Ranawat A., et al. Hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stems. A matched-pair analysis of coated and uncoated implants. J Bone Joint Surg 78-A (1996) 319
25. Udomkiat P., Bei-jiang M., Dorr L.D., et al. Functional comparison of posterior cruciate retention and substitution knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 378 (2000) 192
26. Udomkiat P., Dorr L.D., and Long W. Matched-pair analysis of all-polyethylene versus metal-backed tibial components. J Arthroplasty 16 (2001) 689
27. Salmon P., Hall G.M., Peerbhoy D., et al. Recovery from hip and knee arthroplasty: patients' perspective on pain, function, and quality of life, and well-being up to 6 months postoperatively. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 82 (2001) 380