The effect of total hip arthroplasty surgical approach on gait

Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 44-50

  Madsen, Michael S ^a   Ritter, Merrill A ^b   Morris, Harold H ^a   Meding, John B ^b   Berend, Michael E ^b   Faris, Phillip M ^b   Vardaxis, Vassilios G ^a,c  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b St Francis Hospital   (United States)

^c DES MOINES UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Asymmetries; Biomechanics; Gait; Joint replacement

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FOOT; GAIT; HIP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JOINT FUNCTION; MALE; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; PELVIS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURGICAL APPROACH; TIME; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TRUNK; VELOCITY;

EID: 0346399866     PISSN: 07360266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0736-0266(03)00151-7     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Baker A, Bitounis V. Abductor function after total hip replacement: an electromyographic and clinical review. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1989;71B:47-50.
2. Crenshaw A. Surgical approaches. In: Crenshaw AH, editor. Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics. 8th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby-Year Book, Inc; 1992.
3. Davis R, Ounpuu S, Tyburski D, Gage J. A gait analysis data collection and reduction technique. Hum Movement Sci 1991; 10(5):575-87.
4. Downing N, Clark D, Hutchinson J, et al. Hip abductor strength following total hip arthroplasty: a prospective comparison of the posterior and lateral approach in 100 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 2001;72(3):215-20.
5. Frndak P, Mallory T, Lombardi A. Translateral surgical approach to the hip. Clin Orthop 1993;295:135-41.
6. Gore D, Murray M, Sepic S, Gardner G. Anterolateral compared to posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty: differences in component positioning, hip strength, and hip motion. Clin Orthop 1982;165:180-7.
7. Hodge W, Andriacchi T, Galante J. A relationship between stem orientation and function following total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1991;6(3):229-35.
8. Hurwitz D, Hulet C, Andriacchi T, et al. Gait compensations in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip and their relationship to pain and passive hip motion. J Orthop Res 1997;15(4):629-35.
9. Hurwitz D, Sumner D, Block J. Bone density, dynamic joint loading and joint degeneration. Cells Tissues Organs 2001;169:201-9.
10. Long W, Dorr L, Healy B, Perry J. Functional recovery of noncemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1993;288:73-7.
11. Mallory T, Lombardi A, Fada R, et al. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty using the anterolateral abductor split approach. Clin Orthop 1999;358:166-72.
12. McCrory J, White S, Lifeso R. Vertical ground reaction forces: objective measures of gait following hip arthroplasty. Gait Posture 2001;14:104-9.
13. Murray M, Brewer B, Zuege R. Kinesiologic measurements of functional performance before and after McKee-Farrar total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1972;54A:237-56.
14. Murray M, Gore D, Clarkson B. Walking patterns of patients with unilateral hip pain due to osteo-arthritis and avascular necrosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1971;53A:259-74.
15. National Center for Health Statistics. 1991-2000 National Hospital Discharge Survey.
16. Perron M, Malouin F, Moffet H, McFadyen B. Three-dimensional gait analysis in women with a total hip arthroplasty. Clin Biomech 2000;15:504-15.
17. Rigas C, Xenakis T. Pre- and post-operative gait analysis of hip osteoarthritic patients fitted with ceramic Autophor total hip replacement. Eng Med 1988;17:3-6.
18. Ritter M, Albohm M, Keating M, et al. Comparative outcomes of total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1995;10(6):737-41.
19. Ritter M, Harty L, Keating M, et al. A clinical comparison of the anterolateral and posterolateral approaches to the hip. Clin Orthop 2001;385:95-9.
20. Stauffer R, Smidt G, Wadsworth J. Clinical and biomechanical analysis of gait following charnley total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 1974;99:71-7.
21. Tabachnick B, Fidell L. Using multivariate statistics. 4th ed. Needham Heights, MA, USA: Allyn & Bacon; 2001.
22. Tanaka Y. Gait analysis of patients with osteoarthritis of the hip and those with total hip arthroplasty. Biomed Mater Eng 1998; 8:187-96.
23. Vaz M, Kramer J, Rorabeck C, Bourne R. Isometric hip abductor strength following total hip replacement and its relationship to functional assessments. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1993;18: 526-31.
24. Vicar A, Coleman C. A comparison of the anterolateral, transtrochanteric, and posterior surgical approaches in primary total hip arthoplasty. Clin Orthop 1984;188:152-9.
25. Wall J, Ashburn A, Klenerman L. Gait analysis in the assessment of functional performance before and after total hip replacement. J Biomed Eng 1981;3:121-7.
26. Whittle M. The use of virtual heel markers to measure walking base in clinical gait analysis. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on the 3D Analysis of Human Movement. 2000. p. 70-72.