THA loading arising from increased femoral anterversion and offset may lead to critical cement stresses

Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 767-774

  Kleemann, Ralf U ^a   Heller, Markus O ^a   Stoeckle, Ulrich ^a   Taylor, William R ^a   Duda, Georg N ^a  

^a HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Anteversion; Finite element analysis; Joint geometry; Muscle forces; Total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

BONE; CEMENTS; ORTHOPEDICS; STRESS ANALYSIS;

CEMENT STRESSES;

JOINTS (ANATOMY);

BONE CEMENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BONE STRESS; CASE REPORT; CLIMBING; COMPUTER MODEL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; LOADING TEST; LONGEVITY; MALE; MUSCLE FORCE; MUSCULOSKELETAL FUNCTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; RISK ASSESSMENT; STANDARDIZATION; STRAIN DIFFERENCE; SURGICAL ANATOMY; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; VALIDATION PROCESS; WALKING;

EID: 0042388348     PISSN: 07360266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0736-0266(03)00040-8     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Bauer T, Schils J. The pathology of total hip arthroplasty II. Mechanisms of implant failure. Skeletal Radiol 1999;28:483-97.
2. Bauer T, Schils J. The pathology of total joint arthroplasty I. Mechanisms of implant fixation. Skeletal Radiol 1999;28:423-32.
3. Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, Heller M, et al. Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J Biomech 2001;34:859-71.
4. Bergmann G, Graichen F, Rohlmann A. Hip joint loading during walking and running, measured in two patients. J Biomech 1993;26:969-90.
5. Bergmann G, Graichen F, Rohlmann A. Is staircase walking a risk for the fixation of hip implants? J Biomech 1995;28:535-53.
6. Cannestra VP, Berger RA, Quigley LR, et al. Hybrid total hip arthroplasty with a precoated offset stem. Four to nine-year results. J Bone Joint Surg 2000;82-A:1291-9.
7. Chang PB, Mann KA, Bartel DL. Cemented femoral stem performance. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1998;355:57-69.
8. Cheal EJ, Spector M, Hayes WC. Role of loads and prosthesis material properties on the mechanics of the proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 1992;10:405-22.
9. Davey JR, O'Connor DO, Burke DW, et al. Femoral component offset - Its effect on strain in bone-cement. J Arthroplasty 1993; 8:23-6.
10. Delp SL, Komattu AV, Wixson RL. Superior displacement of the hip in total joint replacement: effects of prosthetic neck length, neck-stem angle, and anteversion angle on the moment-generating capacity of the muscles. J Orthop Res 1994;12(6):860-70.
11. Dorr LD, Wan Z. Causes of and treatment protocol for instability of total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1998;355:144-51.
12. Duda GN, Heller M, Albinger J, et al. Influence of muscle forces on femoral strain distribution. J Biomech 1998;31:841-6.
13. Duda GN, Schneider E, Chao EYS. Internal forces and moments in the femur during walking. J Biomech 1997;30:933-41.
14. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC. Modes of failure of cemented stem-type femoral components. A radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop 1979;41:17-27.
15. Halpern AA, Tanner J, Rinsky L. Does persistent fetal femoral anteversion contribute to osteoarthritis? A preliminary report. Clin Orthop 1979:213-6.
16. Harrigan TP, Harris WH. A three-dimensional non-linear finite element study of the effect of cement-prosthesis debonding in cemented femoral total hip components. J Biomech 1991;24:1047-58.
17. Harrigan TP, Kareh JA, O'Connor DO, et al. A finite element study of the initiation of failure of fixation in cemented femoral total hip components. J Orthop Res 1992;10:134-44.
18. Head WC, Malinin TI, Emerson RH, et al. Restoration of bone stock in revision surgery of the femur. Int Orthop 2000;24:9-14.
19. Heller M, Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, et al. Influence of femoral anteversion on proximal femoral loading: measurement and simulation in four patients. Clin Biomech 2001;16:644-9.
20. Heller MOW, Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, et al. Musculo-skeletal loading conditions during walking and stair climbing. J Biomech 2001;34:883-93.
21. Hodge WA, Andriacchi TP, Galante JO. A relationship between stem orientation and function following total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1991;6:229-35.
22. Johnston RC, Brand RA, Crowninshield RD. Reconstruction of the hip - a mathematical approach to determine optimum geometric relationships. J Bone Joint Surg 1979;61-A:639-52.
23. Malchau H, Herberts P, Ahnfelt L. Prognosis of total hip replacement in Sweden. Follow-up of 92, 675 operations performed 1978-1990. Acta Orthop Scand 1993;64:497-506.
24. Mann KA, Ayers DC, Damron TA. Effects of stem length on mechanics of the femoral hip component after cemented revision. J Orthop Res 1997;15:62-8.
25. Mann KA, Bartel DL, Ayers DC. Influence of stem geometry on mechanics of cemented femoral hip components with a proximal bond. J Orthop Res 1997;15:700-6.
26. Mann KA, Bartel DL, Wright TM, et al. Coulomb frictional interfaces in modeling cemented total hip replacements: a more realistic model. J Biomech 1995;28:1067-78.
27. McGrory BJ, Morrey BF, Cahalan TD, et al. Effect of femoral offset on range of motion and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 1995;77-B:865-9.
28. Morlock M, Schneider E, Blum A, et al. Duration and frequency of every day activities in total hip patients. J Biomech 2001;34:873-81.
29. Norman TL, Thyagarajan G, Saligrama VC, et al. Stem surface roughness alters creep induced subsidence and 'taper-lock' in a cemented femoral hip prosthesis. J Biomech 2001;34:1325-33.
30. Ornstein E, Atroshi I, Franzen H, et al. Results of hip revision using the exeter stem, impacted allograft bone, and cement. Clin Orthop Rel Res 2001;389:126-33.
31. Reikeras O, Bjerkreim I, Kolbenstvedt A. Anteversion of the acetabulum and femoral neck in normals and in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip. Acta Orthop Scand 1983;54:18-23.
32. Reilly DT, Burrstein AH, Frankel VH. The elastic modulus for bone. J Biomech 1974;7:271-5.
33. Rice J, Prenderville T, Murray MP, et al. Femoral cementing techniques in total hip replacement. Int Orthop 1998;22:308-11.
34. Sakalkale DP, Sharkey PF, Eng K, et al. Effect of femoral component offset on polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Rel Res 2001;388:125-34.
35. Schidlo C, Becker C, Jansson V, et al. Change in the CCD angle and the femoral anteversion angle by hip prosthesis implantation. Z Orthop Grenzgeb 1999;137:259-64.
36. Steinberg BD. The "offset" problem in total hip arthroplasty. Contemp Orthop 1992;24:556-62.
37. Stolk J, Verdonschot N, Huiskes R. Hip-joint and abductor-muscle forces adequately represent in vivo loading of cemented total hip reconstruction. J Biomech 2000;34:917-26.
38. Sutherland CJ, Wilde AH, Borden LS, et al. A ten-year follow-up of one hundred consecutive Muller curved-stem total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg 1982;64-A: 970-82.
39. Verdonschot N, Huiskes R. Acrylic cement creeps but does not allow much subsidence of femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg 1997;79-B:665-9.
40. Verdonschot N, Huiskes R. The effects of cement-stem debonding in THA on the long-term failure probability of cement. J Biomech 1997;30:795-802.
41. Weinans H, Huiskes R, Grootenboer HJ. Effects of fit and bonding of femoral stems on adaptive bone remodeling. J Biomech Eng 1994;116:393-400.
42. Wroblewski BM, Siney PD, Fleming PA, et al. The calcar femorale in cemented stem fixation in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 2000;82-B:842-5.