Analysis of Published Evidence on Minimally Invasive Total Hip Arthroplasty

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 23, Issue 7 SUPPL., 2008, Pages 55-

  Wall, Simon J ^a   Mears, Simon C ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

level of evidence; meta analysis; minimally invasive surgery; total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL TRIAL; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; PUBLICATION; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; SCORING SYSTEM; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

EID: 52049100190     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.06.010     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bennett D., Ogonda L., Elliott D., et al. Comparison of gait kinematics in patients receiving minimally invasive and traditional hip replacement surgery: a prospective blinded study. Gait Posture 23 (2006) 374
2. Chimento G.F., Pavone V., Sharrock N., et al. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. A prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty 20 (2005) 139
3. Dorr L.D., Maheshwari A.V., Long W.T., et al. Early pain relief and function after posterior minimally invasive and conventional total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, blinded study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89 (2007) 1153
4. Dutka J., Sosin P., Libura M., et al. Total hip arthroplasty through a minimally invasive lateral approach-our experience and early results. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 9 (2007) 39
5. Hart R., Stipcak V., Janecek M., et al. Component position following total hip arthroplasty through a miniinvasive posterolateral approach. Acta Orthop Belg 71 (2005) 60
6. Kim Y.H. Comparison of primary total hip arthroplasties performed with a minimally invasive technique or a standard technique. A prospective and randomized study. J Arthroplasty 21 (2006) 1092
7. Lawlor M., Humphreys P., Morrow E., et al. Comparison of early postoperative functional levels following total hip replacement using minimally invasive versus standard incisions. A prospective randomized blinded trial. Clin Rehabil 19 (2005) 465
8. Ogonda L., Wilson R., Archbold P., et al. A minimal-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty does not improve early postoperative outcomes. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87 (2005) 701
9. Pour A.E., Parvizi J., Sharkey P.F., et al. Minimally invasive hip arthroplasty: what role does patient preconditioning play?. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89 (2007) 1920
10. Baad-Hansen T., Kold S., Fledelius W., et al. Comparison of performance of conventional and minimally invasive surgery acetabular reamers. Clin Orthop Relat Res 448 (2006) 173
11. Davidson D., Wilson D.C., Jando V.T., et al. Accuracy of cut-off acetabular reamers for minimally invasive THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 453 (2006) 168
12. Ince A., Kemper M., Waschke J., et al. Minimally invasive anterolateral approach to the hip. Risk to the superior gluteal nerve. Acta Orthop 78 (2007) 86
13. Mardones R., Pagnano M.W., Nemanich J.P., et al. The Frank Stinchfield Award. Muscle damage after total hip arthroplasty done with the two-incision and mini-posterior techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res 441 (2005) 63
14. Mayr E., Krismer M., Ertl M., et al. Uncompromised quality of the cement mantle in Exeter femoral components implanted through a minimally-invasive direct anterior approach. A prospective, randomised cadaver study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88 (2006) 1252
15. Meneghini R.M., Pagnano M.W., Trousdale R.T., et al. Muscle damage during MIS total hip arthroplasty. Smith-Petersen versus posterior approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 453 (2006) 293
16. Noble P.C., Johnston J.D., Alexander J.A., et al. Making minimally invasive THR safe: conclusions from biomechanical simulation and analysis. Int Orthop 31 (2007) S25
17. Willems M.M.M., Kooloos J., Gibbons P., et al. The stability of the femoral component of a minimal invasive total hip replacement system. Proc Inst Mech Eng 220 Part H (2006) 465
18. Alfonso D., Idjadi J., and LaMont J.G. Retrieval of a trial femoral head that displaces into the periacetabular soft tissue during mini-incision total hip arthroplasty. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88 (2006) 866
19. Fehring T.K., and Mason J.B. Catastrophic complications of minimally invasive hip surgery. A series of three cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87 (2005) 711
20. Feinblatt J.S., Berend K.R., and Lombardi Jr. A.V. Severe symptomatic heterotopic ossification and dislocation: a complication after two-incision minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 20 (2005) 802
21. Gerrand C., McNulty G., Brewster N., et al. What do patients think about minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty?. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 89 (2007) 685
22. Parvizi J., Sharkey P.F., Pour A.E., et al. Hip arthroplasty with minimally invasive surgery. A survey comparing the opinion of highly qualified experts vs patients. J Arthroplasty 21 (2006) 38
23. White S.P., and Smith E.J. Minimal access surgery for total hip arthroplasty-current beliefs and activity profile in the UK. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 89 (2007) 36
24. Kelmanovich D., Parks M.L., Sinha R., et al. Surgical approaches to total hip arthroplasty. J South Orthop Assoc 12 (2003) 90
25. Nogler M., Krismer M., Hozack W.J., et al. A double offset broach handle for preparation of the femoral cavity in minimally invasive direct anterior total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21 (2006) 1206
26. Suarez-Suarez M.A., and Murcia-Mazon A. A simple method to facilitate mini-incision in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 19 (2004) 395
27. Klein G.R., Parvizi J., Sharkey P.F., et al. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Internet claims made by members of the Hip Society. Clin Orthop Relat Res 441 (2005) 68
28. Labovitch R.S., Bozic K.J., and Hansen E. An evaluation of information available on the internet regarding minimally invasive hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21 (2006) 1
29. Bertin K.C. Minimally invasive outpatient total hip arthroplasty. A financial analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 435 (2005) 154
30. Bozic K.J., and Beringer D. Economic considerations in minimally invasive total joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 463 (2007) 20
31. Reininga I.H.F., Wagenmakers R., van den Akker-Scheek I., et al. Effectiveness of computer-navigated minimally invasive total hip surgery compared to conventional total hip arthroplasty: design of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 8 (2007) 4
32. Wright J.G., Swiontkowski M.F., and Heckman J.D. Introducing levels of evidence to the journal. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85 (2003) 1
33. Madhok R., Elstub L.J., Elliott J., et al. Cochrane bone, joint and muscle trauma group (2008). http://www.mrw.interscience.wiley.com/cochrane/clabout/articles/MUSKINJ/frame.html Accessed March 26
34. Higgins J.P.T., and Green S.e. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 4.2.5. (2008). http://www.cochrane.dk/cochrane/handbook/hbook.htm Accessed March 26
35. Kennon R.E., Keggi J.M., Wetmore R.S., et al. Total hip arthroplasty through a minimally invasive anterior surgical approach. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85 (2003) 39
36. Matta J.M., Shahrdar C., and Ferguson T. Single-incision anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty on an orthopaedic table. Clin Orthop Relat Res 441 (2005) 115
37. Pilot P., Kerens B., Draijer W.F., et al. Is minimally invasive surgery less invasive in total hip replacement? A pilot study. Injury 37 (2006) S17
38. Siguier T., Siguier M., and Brumpt B. Mini-incision anterior approach does not increase dislocation rate. A study of 1037 total hip replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 426 (2004) 164
39. Poolman R.W., Struijs P.A., Krips R., et al. Does a "Level I Evidence" rating imply high quality of reporting in orthopaedic randomised controlled trials?. BMC Med Res Methodol 6 (2006) 44