Arabidopsis T-DNA insertional lines for CDC25 are hypersensitive to hydroxyurea but not to zeocin or salt stress

Annals of Botany

Volumn 107, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 1183-1192

  Spadafora, Natasha D ^a,c,d   Doonan, John H ^b   Herbert, Robert J ^c   Bitonti, M Beatrice ^d   Wallace, Emily ^a   Rogers, Hilary J ^a   Francis, Dennis ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b JOHN INNES CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WORCESTER   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALABRIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Arabidopsis thaliana; cell cycle checkpoints; hydroxyurea; NaCl; root growth; zeocin

Indexed keywords

ARABIDOPSIS PROTEIN; ARSENATE REDUCTASE 2, ARABIDOPSIS; BACTERIAL DNA; BLEOMYCIN; HYDROXYUREA; MESSENGER RNA; MULTIENZYME COMPLEX; OXIDOREDUCTASE; PROTEIN TYROSINE PHOSPHATASE; SODIUM CHLORIDE; T DNA; T-DNA; ZEOCIN;

ANTIBIOTICS; CYTOLOGY; DICOTYLEDON; ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS; ENZYME ACTIVITY; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOTYPE; PHENOTYPE; PHYTOCHEMISTRY; SALINITY; SODIUM CHLORIDE; TOLERANCE; YEAST;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARTICLE; DRUG EFFECT; ENZYMOLOGY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; PLANT ROOT;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS PROTEINS; BLEOMYCIN; CDC25 PHOSPHATASES; DNA, BACTERIAL; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; GENOTYPE; HYDROXYUREA; MULTIENZYME COMPLEXES; MUTAGENESIS, INSERTIONAL; OXIDOREDUCTASES; PHENOTYPE; PLANT ROOTS; RNA, MESSENGER; SODIUM CHLORIDE; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL;

ANIMALIA; ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA; EMBRYOPHYTA;

EID: 79551664721     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcq142     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Abraham J, Kelly J, Thibault P, Benchimok S. 2000. Post-translational modification of p53 protein in response to ionizing radiation analyzed by mass spectrometry. Journal of Molecular Biology 295: 853-864.
2. Al-Khodairy F, Fotou E, Sheldrick KS, Griffiths DJ, Lehmann AR, Carr AM. 1994. Identification and characterization of new elements involved in checkpoint and feedback controls in fission yeast. Molecular Biology of the Cell 5: 147-160. (Pubitemid 24108461)
3. Benfey PN, Chua N. 1990. The cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter: combinatorial regulation of transcription in plants. Science 250: 959-966. (Pubitemid 120031796)
4. Bhattacharjee H, Sheng J, Ajees AA, Mukhopadhyay R, Rosen BP. 2010. Adventitious arsenate reductase activity of the catalytic domain of the human Cdc25B and Cdc25C phosphatases. Biochemistry 49: 802-809.
5. Bleeker PM, Hakvoort HWJ, Bliek M, Souer E, Schat H. 2006. Enhanced arsenate reduction by a CDC25-like tyrosine phosphatase explains increased phytochelatin accumulation in arsenate-tolerant Holcus lanatus. The Plant Journal 45: 917-929. (Pubitemid 43344754)
6. Boddy MN, Russell P. 2001. DNA replication checkpoint. Current Biology 11: R953-956.
7. Branzei D, Foiani M. 2008. Regulation of DNA repair throughout the cell cycle. Nature Reviews, Molecular and Cell Biology 9: 297-308. (Pubitemid 351430844)
8. Chen MS, Ryan CE, Piwnica-Worms H. 2003. Chk1 kinase negatively regulates mitotic function of Cdc25A phosphatase through 14-3-3 binding. Molecular Cell Biology 23: 7488-7497. (Pubitemid 37271450)
9. Culligan K, Tissier A, Britt A. 2004. ATR regulates a G2-phase cell-cycle checkpoint in Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Cell 16: 1091-1104. (Pubitemid 38641508)
10. Dalal SN, Schweitzer CM, Gan J, DeCaprio JA. 1999. Cytoplasmic localization of human cdc25C during interphase requires an intact 14-3-3 binding site. Molecular and Cell Biology 19: 4465-4479. (Pubitemid 29242020)
11. De Schutter K, Joubes J, Cools T, et al. 2007. Arabidopsis WEE1 kinase controls cell cycle arrest in response to activation of the DNA integrity checkpoint. The Plant Cell 19: 211-225. (Pubitemid 46852712)
12. Dhankher OP, Rosen BP, McKinney E, Meagher RB. 2006. Hyperaccumulation of arsenic in the shoots of arabidopsis silenced for arsenate reductase (ACR2). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 14: 5413-5418.
13. Dissmeyer N, Weimer AK, Pusch S, et al. 2009. Control of cell proliferation, organ growth, and DNA damage response operate independently of dephosphorylation of the Arabidopsis Cdk1Homolog CDKA;1. The Plant Cell 21: 3641-3654.
14. Donzelli M, Draetta GF. 2003. Regulating mammalian checkpoints through Cdc25 inactivation. EMBO reports 4: 671-677. (Pubitemid 36974751)
15. Edwards K, Johnstone C, Thompson C. 1991. A simple and rapid method for the preparation of plant genomic DNA for PCR analysis. Nucleic Acids Research 19: 1349.
16. Eklund H, Uhlin U, Farnegardh M, Logan DT, Nordlund P. 2001. Structure and function of the radical enzyme ribonucleotide reductase. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology 77: 177-268. (Pubitemid 34131599)
17. Elledge SJ. 1996. Cell cycle checkpoints: preventing an identity crisis. Science 274: 1664-1672. (Pubitemid 26414889)
18. Francis D. 2008. What's new in the plant cell cycle. Progress in Botany 70: 33-49.
19. Gabrielli BG, Clark JM, McCormack AK, Ellem KA. 1997. Hyperphosphorylation of the N-terminal domain of Cdc25 regulates activity toward cyclin B1/Cdc2 but not cyclin A/Cdk2. Journal of Biological Chemistry 272: 28607-28614. (Pubitemid 27517814)
20. Garcia V, Bruchet H, Camescasse D, Granier F, Bouchez D, Tissier A. 2003. AtATM is essential for meiosis and the somatic response to DNA damage in plants. The Plant Cell 15: 119-132. (Pubitemid 36137666)
21. Hartwell LH, Weinert TA. 1989. Checkpoints: controls that ensure the order of cell cycle events. Science 246: 629-634. (Pubitemid 19283354)
22. Karlsson-Rosenthal C, Millar JBA. 2006. Cdc25: mechanisms of checkpoint inhibition and recovery. Trends in Cell Biology 16: 285-293.
23. Khadaroo B, Robbens S, Ferraz C, et al. 2004. The first green lineage cdc25 dual-specificity phosphatase. Cell Cycle 3: 513-518. (Pubitemid 40278247)
24. Landrieu I, da Costa M, De Veylder L, et al. 2004. A small CDC25 dual-specificity tyrosine-phosphatase isoform in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 16: 16391-16401.
25. Lehmann GM, McCabe MJ. 2007. Arsenite slows S phase progression via inhibition of cdc25A dual specificity phosphatase gene transcription. Toxicological Sciences 99: 70-78. (Pubitemid 47250368)
26. Molinari M, Mercurio C, Dominguez J, Goubin F, Draetta GF. 2000. Human Cdc25 A inactivation in response to S phase inhibition and its role in preventing premature mitosis. EMBO reports 1: 71-79.
27. cdc25 mitotic inducer in fission yeast . Nature 344: 549-552.
28. Nilsson I, Hoffmann I. 2000. Cell cycle regulation by the Cdc25 phosphatase family. Progress in Cell Cycle Research 4: 107-114.
29. Orchard CB, Siciliano I, Sorrell, et al. 2005. Tobacco BY-2 cells expressing fission yeast cdc25 bypass a G2/M block on the cell cycle. The Plant Journal 44: 290-299.
30. Price AM, Aros Orellana DF, Salleh FM, et al. 2008. A comparison of leaf and petal senescence in wallflowers (Erysimum linifolium) reveals common and distinct patterns of gene expression and physiology. Plant Physiology 147: 1898-1912. (Pubitemid 352844231)
31. Rothblum-Oviatt CJ, Ryan CE, Piwnica-Worms H. 2001. 14-3-3 binding regulates catalytic activity of human Wee1 kinase. Cell Growth and Differentiation 12: 581-589. (Pubitemid 34084111)
32. Rhind N, Russell P. 2000. Chk1 and Cds1: linchpins of the DNA damage and replication checkpoint pathways. Journal of Cell Science 113: 3896-3899.
33. + functions in a regulatory network of protein kinase homologs controlling the initiation of mitosis. Cell 49: 569-576.
34. Sanchez Y, Wong C, Thoma RS, et al. 1997. Conservation of the Chk1 checkpoint pathway in mammals: linkage of DNA damage to Cdk regulation through Cdc25. Science 277: 1497-1501. (Pubitemid 27449236)
35. Sorrell DA, Marchbank A, McMahon K, Dickinson JR, Rogers HJ, Francis D. 2002. A WEE1 homologue from Arabidopsis thaliana. Planta 215: 518-522. (Pubitemid 36080306)
36. Sorrell DA, Chrimes D, Dickinson JR, Rogers HJ, Francis D. 2005. The Arabidopsis CDC25 induces a short cell length when overexpressed in fission yeast: evidence for cell cycle function. New Phytologist 165: 425-428. (Pubitemid 40177954)
37. Trastoy MO, Defais M, Larminat F. 2005. Resistance to the antiobiotic zeocin by stable expression of the SH ble gene does not fully suppress zeocin-induced cleavage in human cells. Mutagenesis 20: 111-114. (Pubitemid 40637810)
38. Zachos G, Rainey MD, Gillespie DA. 2003. Chk1-deficient tumour cells are viable but exhibit multiple checkpoint and survival defects. EMBO Journal 22: 713-723. (Pubitemid 36193615)
39. Zeng Y, Piwnica-Worms H. 1999. DNA damage and replication checkpoints in fission yeast require nuclear exclusion of the Cdc25 phosphatase via 14-3-3 binding. Molecular Cell Biology 19: 7410-7419. (Pubitemid 29493404)