Male-female differences in scoliosis research society-30 scores in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Spine

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  Roberts, David W ^a   Savage, Jason W ^a   Schwartz, Daniel G ^a   Carreon, Leah Y ^b   Sucato, Daniel J ^c   Sanders, James O ^d   Richards, Benjamin Stephens ^c   Lenke, Lawrence G ^e   Emans, John B ^f   Parent, Stefan ^g   Sarwark, John F ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NORTON LEATHERMAN SPINE CENTER   (United States)

^c TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF MONTREAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; functional outcomes; males versus females; sex; surgical treatment

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; BRACE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PAIN ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SEX DIFFERENCE;

ADOLESCENT; CANADA; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SCOLIOSIS; SELF CONCEPT; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SEX FACTORS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

EID: 78751607009     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ef9efc     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Raggio CL. Sexual dimorphism in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Orthop Clin North Am 2006;37(4):555-8.
2. Suh PB, MacEwen GD. Idiopathic scoliosis in males. A natural history study. Spine 1988;13(10):1091-5.
3. Nachemson AL, Peterson LE. Effectiveness of treatment with a brace in girls who have adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A prospective, controlled study based on data from the Brace Study of the Scoliosis Research Society. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995;77(6):815-22.
4. Karol LA. Effectiveness of bracing in male patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2001;26(18):2001-5.
5. Yrjonen T, Ylikoski M, Schlenzka D, et al. Results of brace treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in boys compared with girls: a retrospective study of 102 patients treated with the Boston brace. Eur Spine J 2007;16(3):393-7.
6. Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Baldus C, et al. Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992;74(7):1056-67.
7. Richards BS, Herring JA, Johnston CE, et al. Treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using Texas Scottish Rite Hospital instrumentation. Spine 1994;19(14):1598-605.
8. Ameri E, Behtash H, Mobini B, et al. Radiographic outcome of surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in males versus females. Scoliosis 2008;3:12.
9. Merola AA, Haher TR, Brkaric M, et al. A multicenter study of the outcomes of the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) outcome instrument. Spine 2002;15,27(18):2046- 51.
10. White SF, Asher MA, Lai SM, et al. Patients' perceptions of overall function, pain, and appearance after primary posterior instrumentation and fusion for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1999;24(16):1693-9; discussion 1699-700.
11. Marks M, Petcharaporn M, Betz RR, et al. Outcomes of surgical treatment in male versus female adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients. Spine 2007;32(5):544-9.
12. Helenius I, Remes V, Yrjonen T, et al. Does gender affect outcome of surgery in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? Spine 2005;30(4):462-7.
13. Sucato DJ, Hedequist D, Karol LA. Operative correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in male patients. A radiographic and functional outcome comparison with female patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86-A(9):2005-14.
14. SRS-30 Patient Questionnaire. Scoliosis Research Society web site. Available at: http://www.srs.org/professionals/outcomes/srs-30.pdf. Accessed November 11, 2009.
15. Society SR. SRS-30 Patient Questionnaire/Score Sheet. Available at: http://www.srs.org/professionals/outcomes/srs-30-score-sheet.pdf. Accessed November 11, 2009.
16. SRS-22 Patient Questionnaire. Scoliosis Research Society web site. Available at: http://www.srs.org/professionals/outcomes/srs-22.pdf. Accessed November 11, 2009.
17. SRS-22 Patient Questionnaire Scored Sample. Scoliosis Research Society web site. Available at: http://www.srs.org/professionals/outcomes/ srs-22-sample.pdf. Accessed November 11, 2009.
18. Verma K, Lonner B, Hoashi JS, et al. Demographic factors affect scoliosis research society-22 performance in healthy adolescents: a comparative baseline for adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2010;35(24):2134-9.
19. Parent EC, Wong D, Hill D, et al. The association between Scoliosis Research Society-22 scores and scoliosis severity changes at a clinically relevant threshold. Spine 2010;35(3):315-22.
20. Parent EC, Dang R, Hill D, et al. Score distribution of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire in subgroups of patients of all ages with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2010;35(5):568-77.
21. Carreon LY, Sanders JO, Diab M, et al. The minimum clinically important difference in Scoliosis Research Society-22 appearance, activity, and pain domains after surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2010;35(23):2079-83.
22. Adobor RD, Rimeslatten S, Keller A, et al. Repeatability, reliability, and concurrent validity of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire and EuroQol in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2010;35(2):206-9.
23. Parent EC, Hill D, Mahood J, et al. Discriminative and predictive validity of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire in management and curve-severity subgroups of adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2009;34(22):2450-7.
24. Lonner BS, Auerbach JD, Estreicher M, et al. Video-assisted anterior thoracoscopic spinal fusion versus posterior spinal fusion: a comparative study utilizing the SRS-22 outcome instrument. Spine 2009;34(2):193-8.
25. Bago J, Perez-Grueso FJ, Les E, et al. Minimal important differences of the SRS-22 Patient Questionnaire following surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 2009;18(12):1898-904.
26. Cheung KM, Cheng EY, Chan SC, et al. Outcome assessment of bracing in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis by the use of the SRS-22 questionnaire. Int Orthop 2007;31(4):507-11.
27. Bridwell KH, Berven S, Glassman S, et al. Is the SRS-22 instrument responsive to change in adult scoliosis patients having primary spinal deformity surgery? Spine 2007;32(20):2220-5.
28. Lai SM, Asher M, Burton D. Estimating SRS-22 quality of life measures with SF-36: application in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2006;15,31(4):473-8.
29. Asher MA, Lai SM, Glattes RC, et al. Refi nement of the SRS-22 health-related quality of life questionnaire function domain. Spine 2006;31(5):593-7.
30. Bridwell KH, Cats-Baril W, Harrast J, et al. The validity of the SRS-22 instrument in an adult spinal deformity population compared with the Oswestry and SF-12: a study of response distribution, concurrent validity, internal consistency, and reliability. Spine 2005;30(4):455-61.
31. Asher M, Min Lai S, Burton D, et al. The reliability and concurrent validity of the scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2003;28(1):63-9. (Pubitemid 36070775)
32. Asher M, Min Lai S, Burton D, et al. Scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire: responsiveness to change associated with surgical treatment. Spine 2003;28(1):70-3.
33. Asher M, Min Lai S, Burton D, et al. Discrimination validity of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 patient questionnaire: relationship to idiopathic scoliosis curve pattern and curve size. Spine 2003;28(1):74-8.
34. Wang C, Xu W, He S, et al. Differences in postoperative quality of life between adolescent patients with idiopathic scoliosis residing in urban and rural environments. Spine 2010 Feb 26. [Epub ahead of print].
35. Niemeyer T, Schubert C, Halm HF, et al. Validity and reliability of an adapted German version of Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire. Spine 2009;34(8):818-21.
36. Cheung KM, Senkoylu A, Alanay A, et al. Reliability and concurrent validity of the adapted Chinese version of Scoliosis Research Society- 22 (SRS-22) questionnaire. Spine 2007;32(10):1141-5.
37. Alanay A, Cil A, Berk H, et al. Reliability and validity of adapted Turkish version of Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire. Spine 2005;30(21):2464-8.
38. Climent JM, Bago J, Ey A, et al. Validity of the Spanish version of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) patient questionnaire. Spine 2005;30(6):705-9.
39. Watanabe K, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. Cross-cultural comparison of the Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Instrument between American and Japanese idiopathic scolio- sis patients: are there differences? Spine 2007;32(24):2711-4.
40. Watanabe K, Hasegawa K, Hirano T, et al. Use of the Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Instrument to evaluate patient outcome in untreated idiopathic scoliosis patients in Japan: part II-relation between spinal deformity and patient outcomes. Spine 2005;30(10):1202-5. (Pubitemid 40695932)