Use of the Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Instrument to evaluate patient outcome in untreated idiopathic scoliosis patients in Japan. Part II: Relation between spinal deformity and patient outcomes

Spine

Volumn 30, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 1202-1205

  Watanabe, Kei ^a   Hasegawa, Kazuhiro ^a   Hirano, Toru ^a   Uchiyama, Seiji ^a   Endo, Naoto ^a  

^a NIIGATA UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES   (Japan)

Author keywords

Idiopathic scoliosis; Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Instrument; Spinal deformity; Untreated japanese patients

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CONFERENCE PAPER; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; JAPAN; LUMBAR SPINE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCHOOL CHILD; SCOLIOSIS RESEARCH SOCIETY OUTCOMES QUESTIONNAIRE; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF CONCEPT; SPINE MALFORMATION; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BODY IMAGE; CHILD; CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; JAPAN; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT SATISFACTION; SCOLIOSIS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL; SPINE;

EID: 18844445404     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000162285.12045.81     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Edgar MA, Mehta MH. Long term follow-up of fused and unfused idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1988;70:712-6.
2. Goldberg MS, Mayo NE, Poitras B, et al. The Ste-Justine adolescent idiopathic scoliosis cohort study: II. Perception of health, self and body image, and participation in physical activities. Spine 1994;19:1562-72.
3. Haher TR, Gorup JM, Shin TM, et al. Result of the Scoliosis Research Society instrument for evaluation of surgical outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1999;24:1435-40.
4. King HA, Moe JH, Bradford DS, et al. The selection of fusion levels in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1983;65:1302-13.
5. Perdriolle R, Vidal J. A study of scoliotic curve: the importance of extension and vertebral rotation. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 1981;67: 25-34.
6. Lonstein JE. Idiopathic scoliosis. In: Moe's Textbook of Scoliosis and Other Spinal Deformity, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1994:219-56.
7. Bjerkreim I, Hassan I. Progression in untreated idiopathic scoliosis after the end of growth. Acta Orthop Scand 1982;53:897-900.
8. Fowles JV, Drummond DS, Ecoyer S, et al. The prognosis of untreated scoliosis in the adult. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1976;58:156.
9. Weinstein SL, Zaval DC, Ponseti IV. Idiopathic scoliosis long-term follow-up and prognosis in untreated patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1981;63:702-12.
10. Danielsson AJ, Wiklund I, Pehrsson K, et al. Health-related quality of life in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a matched follow-up at least 20 years after treatment with brace or surgery. Eur Spine J 2001;10:278-88.
11. Korovessis PG, Stamatakis MV. Prediction of scoliosis Cobb angle with the use of the scoliometer. Spine 1996;21:1661-6.
12. Griffet J, Leroux MA, Badeaux J, et al. Relationship between gibbosity and Cobb angle during treatment of idiopathic scoliosis with the SpineCor brace. Eur Spine J 2000;9:516-22.
13. Pearsall DJ, Reid JG, Hedden DM. Comparison of three noninvasive methods for measuring scoliosis. Phys Ther 1992;72:648-57.
14. Sanders JO, Polly DW, Cats-Baril W, et al. Analysis of patient and parent assessment of deformity in idiopathic scoliosis using the Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale. Spine 2003;28:2158-63.