Score distribution of the scoliosis research society-22 questionnaire in subgroups of patients of all ages with idiopathic scoliosis

Spine

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 568-577

  Parent, Eric C ^a,b   Dang, Rohan ^b   Hill, Doug ^b   Mahood, Jim ^b   Moreau, Marc ^b   Raso, Jim ^b   Lou, Edmond ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b GLENROSE REHABILITATION HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Ceiling effect; Healthrelated quality of life; Outcome measure; Questionnaire; Scoliosis

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; PAIN; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF CONCEPT;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BODY IMAGE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MENTAL HEALTH; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SCOLIOSIS; SELF CONCEPT; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 77649301755     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b9c9c0     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. National Scoliosis Foundation. Information and Support. Available at: http://www.scoliosis.org/info.php. Accessed April 1, 2008.
2. Asher MA, Min LS, Burton DC. Further development and validation of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) outcomes instrument. Spine 2000;25: 2381-2386
3. Asher M, Min LS, Burton D, et al. The reliability and concurrent validity of the scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2003;28:63-69 (Pubitemid 36070775)
4. Loder RT, Spiegel D, Gutknecht S, et al. The assessment of intraobserver and interobserver error in the measurement of noncongenital scoliosis in children less than or equal to 10 years of age. Spine 2004;29:2548-2553
5. D'Andrea LP, Betz RR, Lenke LG, et al. Do radiographic parameters correlate with clinical outcomes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? Spine 2000;25: 1795-1802
6. Feise RJ, Donaldson S, Crowther ER, et al. Construction and validation of the scoliosis quality of life index in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2005;30:1310-1315
7. White SF, Asher MA, Lai SM, et al. Patients' perceptions of overall function, pain, and appearance after primary posterior instrumentation and fusion for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1999;24:1693-1699
8. Haher TR, Gorup JM, Shin TM, et al. Results of the Scoliosis Research Society instrument for evaluation of surgical outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A multicenter study of 244 patients. Spine 1999;24:1435-1440
9. Asher M, Min LS, Burton D, et al. Discrimination validity of the scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire: relationship to idiopathic scoliosis curve pattern and curve size. Spine 2003;28:74-78
10. Asher M, Min LS, Burton D, et al. Scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire: responsiveness to change associated with surgical treatment. Spine 2003;28:70-73
11. Berven S, Deviren V, Demir-Deviren S, et al. Studies in the modified scoliosis research society outcomes instrument in adults: validation, reliability, and discriminatory capacity. Spine 2003;28:2164-2169
12. Bridwell KH, Cats-Baril W, Harrast J, et al. The validity of the SRS-22 instrument in an adult spinal deformity population compared with the Oswestry and SF-12: a study of response distribution, concurrent validity, internal consistency, and reliability. Spine 2005;30:455-461
13. Parent EC, Hill D, Mahood J, et al. Discriminative and predictive validity of Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire for management and curve severity subgroups with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2009;34: 2450-2457
14. Parent EC, Hill DL, Mahood JK, et al. Score distribution of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 Questionnaire in different management, and age subgroups with idiopathic scoliosis [E-Poster:8]. Paper presented at: 41st Annual Scoliosis Research Society Meeting; September 13-16, 2006; Monterey, CA. Available at: http://www.srs.org/meetings/am06/eposters.pdf.
15. Parent EC, Hill D, Moreau M, et al. Score distribution of the Scoliosis Quality of Life Index questionnaire in different subgroups of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2007;32:1767-1777
16. Scoliosis Research Society. SRS 22 Scored Sample. Scoliosis Research Soci- ety. Available at: http://www.srs.org/professionals/outcomes/srs-22- sample. pdf. Accessed April 21, 2009.
17. Cobb JR. Outline for the study of scoliosis. Am Acad Ortho Surg Inst Lect 1948;5:261-275
18. Morrissy RT, Goldsmith GS, Hall EC, et al. Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis. Evaluation of intrinsic error. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990;72:320-327
19. Spinal Deformity Study Group. Spinal Deformity Study Group Radiographic Measurement Manual. Warsaw, IN: Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA Inc; 2004:1-110.
20. Parent E, Moreau M, Mahood J, et al. Score distribution and discriminative validity of quality of life scores in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. J Can Chir 2006;49:6.
21. McHorney CA, Ware JE, Lu JF, et al. The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care 1994;32:40-66.
22. Mao HF, Hsueh IP, Tang PF, et al. Analysis and comparison of the psychometric properties of three balance measures for stroke patients. Stroke 2002; 33:1022-1027
23. Raat H, Botterweck AM, Landgraf JM, et al. Reliability and validity of the short form of the child health questionnaire for parents (CHQ-PF28) in large random school based and general population samples. J Epidemiol Community Health 2005;59:75-82.
24. Holmes WC, Shea JA. Performance of a new, HIV/AIDS-targeted quality of life (HAT-QoL) instrument in asymptomatic seropositive individuals. Qual Life Res 1997;6:561-571
25. Asher MA, Lai SM, Glattes RC, et al. Refinement of the SRS-22 Health- Related Quality of Life questionnaire Function domain. Spine 2006;31: 593-597
26. Vitale MG, Levy DE, Johnson MG, et al. Assessment of quality of life in adolescent patients with orthopedic problems: are adult measures appropriate? J Pediatr Orthop 2001;21:622-628
27. Climent JM, Bago J, Ey A, et al. Validity of the Spanish version of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) patient questionnaire. Spine 2005; 30:705-709
28. Alanay A, Cil A, Berk H, et al. Reliability and validity of adapted Turkish Version of Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire. Spine 2005;30:2464-2468
29. Asher M, Lai SM, Burton D, et al. Spine deformity correlates better than trunk deformity with idiopathic scoliosis patients' quality of life questionnaire responses. Stud Health Technol Inform 2002;91:462-464
30. Merola AA, Haher TR, Brkaric M, et al. A multicenter study of the outcomes of the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) outcome instrument. Spine 2002; 27:2046-2051
31. Rinella A, Lenke L, Peelle M, et al. Comparison of SRS questionnaire results submitted by both parents and patients in the operative treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2004;29:303-310
32. Bunge EM, Juttmann RE, de Kleuver M, et al. Health-related quality of life in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after treatment: short-term effects after brace or surgical treatment. Eur Spine J 2007;16:83-89