Demographic factors affect scoliosis research society-22 performance in healthy adolescents: A comparative baseline for adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis

Spine

Volumn 35, Issue 24, 2010, Pages 2134-2139

  Verma, Kushagra ^a   Lonner, Baron ^a   Hoashi, Jane S ^a   Lafage, Virginie ^a   Dean, Laura ^a   Engel, Itzhak ^a   Goldstein, Yael ^a  

^a NYU HOSPITAL FOR JOINT DISEASES   (United States)

Author keywords

adolescent; demographics; healthy; income; race; scoliosis; SRS 22

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AFRICAN AMERICAN; ARTICLE; ASIAN; BODY MASS; CHILD; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HIGH SCHOOL; HISPANIC; HOUSEHOLD; HUMAN; IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; INCOME; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; NORMAL HUMAN; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PARENT; PEDIATRICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RACE; SCHOOL CHILD; SCOLIOSIS RESEARCH SOCIETY 22; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF CONCEPT; SEX DIFFERENCE;

ADOLESCENT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHILD; CULTURAL CHARACTERISTICS; EUROPEAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; FAMILY CHARACTERISTICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCOME; MALE; NEW YORK CITY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; REFERENCE VALUES; SCOLIOSIS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SEX FACTORS; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78649442735     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cb474f     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Haher TR, Gorup JM, Shin TM, et al. Results of the Scoliosis Research Society Instrument for evaluation of surgical outcome in adolescent idio-pathic scoliosis: a multicenter study of 244 patients. Spine 1999;24: 1435-40.
2. Baldus C, Bridwell KH, Harrast J, et al. Age-gender matched comparison of SRS instrument scores between adult deformity and normal adults. Are all SRS domains disease specific? Spine 2008;33:2214-8.
3. Asher MA, Lai SM, Burton D, et al. The reliability and concurrent validity of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoli-osis. Spine 2003;28:63-9.
4. Asher MA, Lai SM, Burton D. Further development and validation of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) outcomes instrument. Spine 2000;25: 2381-6.
5. Asher MA, Lai SM, Glattes C, et al. Refinement of the SRS-22 health-related quality of life questionnaire function domain. Spine 2006;31:593-7.
6. White SF, Asher MA, Lai SM, et al. Patients' perceptions of overall function, pain, and appearance after primary posterior instrumentation and fusion for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1999;24:1693-1700.
7. Haher TR, Valdevit A. The use of outcomes instruments in the assessment of patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Instr Course Lect 2005;54:543-50.
8. Niemeyer T, Schubert C, Halm HF, et al. Validity and reliability of an adapted German version of Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire. Spine 2009;34:818-21.
9. Cheung KM, Senkoylu A, Alanay A, et al. Reliability and concurrent validity of the adapted Chinese version of Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire. Spine 2007;32:1141-5.
10. Alanay A, Cil A, Berk H, et al. Reliability and validity of adapted Turkish version of Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire. Spine 2005; 30:2464-8.
11. Climent JM, Bago J, Ey A, et al. Validity of the Spanish version of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) patient questionnaire. Spine 2005; 30:705-9.
12. Watanabe K, Lenke L, Bridwell KH, et al. Cross-cultural comparison of the Scoliosis Research Society outcomes instrument between American and Japanese idiopathic scoliosis patients. Are there differences? Spine 2007;32:2711-4.
13. Watanabe K, Hasegawa K, Hirano T, et al. Use of the Scoliosis Research Society outcomes instrument to evaluate patient outcome in untreated idio-pathic scoliosis patients in Japan. Part I: comparison with nonscoliosis group: preliminary/limited review in a Japanese population. Spine 2005;30: 1197-201.
14. Asher MA, Lai SM, Burton D, et al. Scoliosis Research Society-22 patient questionnaire. Spine 2003;28:70-3.
15. Lai SM, Asher M, Burton D. Estimating SRS-22 quality of life measures with SR-36: application in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2006;31:473-8.
16. Asher M, Lai SM, Burton D, et al. The influence ofspine and trunk deformity on preoperative idiopathic scoliosis patients' health-related quality of life questionnaire responses. Spine 2004;29:861-8.
17. Asher MA, Lai SM, Burton D, et al. Discrimination validity of the scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire: relationship to idiopathic scoliosis curve pattern and curve size. Spine 2003;28:74-8.
18. Cheung KM, Cheng EY, Chan SC, et al. Outcome assessment of bracing in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis by the use of the SRS-22 questionnaire. Int Orthop 2007;31:507-11.