Repeatability, reliability, and concurrent validity of the scoliosis research society-22 questionnaire and EuroQol in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Spine

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 206-209

  Adobor, Raphael D ^a   Rimeslåtten, Silje ^a   Keller, Anne ^b   Brox, Jens Ivar ^a  

^a OSLO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b ULLEVÅL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

Author keywords

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; EuroQol; Repeatability; SRS 22

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BRACE; CHILD; CONCURRENT VALIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; EUROQOL 5D; EUROQOL VAS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HUMAN; IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; NORWAY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCHOOL CHILD; SCOLIOSIS RESEARCH SOCIETY 22 QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF CONCEPT; SPINAL PAIN; SPINE MALFORMATION; SPINE SURGERY;

EID: 77749304926     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b43bdf     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Alanay A, Cil A, Berk H, et al. Reliability and validity of adapted Turkish Version of Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire. Spine 2005;30:2464-8.
2. Altman DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London, United Kingdom: Chapman and Hall; 1991.
3. Asher M, Min LS, Burton D, et al. The reliability and concurrent validity of the scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2003;28:63-9.
4. Asher MA, Lai SM, Glattes RC, et al. Refinement of the SRS-22 health-related quality of life questionnaire function domain. Spine 2006;31:593-7.
5. Bago J, Climent JM, Ey A, et al. The Spanish version of the SRS-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis: transcultural adaptation and reliability analysis. Spine 2004;29:1676-80.
6. Cheung KM, Senkoylu A, Alanay A, et al. Reliability and concurrent validity of the adapted Chinese version of Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire. Spine 2007;32:1141-5.
7. Climent JM, Bago J, Ey A, et al. Validity of the Spanish version of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) patient questionnaire. Spine 2005; 30:705-9.
8. Hashimoto H. Validation of a Japanese version of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 patient questionnaire among idiopathic scoliosis patients in Japan. Spine 2007;32:E141-6.
9. de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Knol DL, et al. When to use agreement versus reliability measures. J Clin Epidemiol 2006;59:1033-9.
10. Solberg TK, Olsen JA, Ingebrigtsen T, et al. Health-related quality of life assessment by the EuroQol-5D can provide cost-utility data in the field of low-back surgery. Eur Spine J 2005;14:1000-7.
11. Guillemin F. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of health status measures. Scand J Rheumatol 1995;24:61-3.
12. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-10.
13. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1999;8:135-60.