Reliability and validity of adapted Turkish version of Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire

Spine

Volumn 30, Issue 21, 2005, Pages 2464-2468

  Alanay, Ahmet ^a   Cil, Akin ^a   Berk, Haluk ^b   Acaroglu, R Emre ^a   Yazici, Muharrem ^a   Akcali, Omer ^b   Kosay, Can ^b   Genc, Yasemin ^c   Surat, Adil ^a  

^a HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b DOKUZ EYLUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c ANKARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Idiopathic scoliosis; Modified SRS outcomes instrument; Outcome analysis; SRS outcomes instrument

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; CULTURAL FACTOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCOLIOSIS; SCOLIOSIS RESEARCH SOCIETY 22; SELF CONCEPT; SHORT FORM 36; TURKEY (REPUBLIC);

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON; CULTURE; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; MALE; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SCOLIOSIS; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL; TURKEY;

EID: 27644480383     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000184366.71761.84     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Pehrsson K, Larsson S, Oden A, et al. Long term follow-up of patients with untreated scoliosis: a study of mortality, causes of death, and symptoms. Spine 1992;17:1091-6.
2. Haher TR, Gorup JM, Shin TM, et al. Results of Scoliosis Research Society instrument for evaluation of surgical outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a multicenter study of 244 patients. Spine 1999;24:1435-40.
3. Asher M, Lai SM, Burton D. Further development and validation of the scoliosis of the Scoliosis Research Society outcomes instrument. Spine 2000;25:2381-6.
4. Asher M, Lai SM, Burton D, et al. The reliability and concurrent validity of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2003;28:63-9.
5. Asher M, Lai SM, Burton D, et al. Scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire: responsiveness to change associated with surgical treatment. Spine 2003;28:70-3.
6. Asher M, Lai SM, Burton D, et al. Discrimination validity of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 patient questionnaire: relationship to idiopathic scoliosis curve pattern and curve size. Spine 2003;28:74-8.
7. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 2000;25:3186-91.
8. Demirsoy A. The MOS SF36 health survey: a validation study with a Turkish sample [Unpublished master's thesis]. Department of Psychology, Bogazici University, Istanbul, 1999.
9. Bago J, Climent JM, Ey A, et al. The Spanish version of the SRS-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis: transcultural adaptation and reliability analysis. Spine 2004;29:1676-80.
10. Howard KI, Forehand GG. A method for correcting item-total for the effect of relevant item inclusion. Educ Psychol Meas 1963;22:40-6.
11. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorized data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-74.