A computer-assisted learning model based on the digital game exponential reward system

Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 1-14

  Moon, Man Ki ^a   Jahng, Surng Gahb ^a   Kim, Tae Yong ^a  

^a Chung Ang University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Computer assisted learning model; Digital game reward system; Exponential learning model

Indexed keywords

EID: 78751539309     PISSN: None     EISSN: 13036521     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Browne, E. (2003). Conversation in cyberspace: A study of online learning, Open Learning, 18 (3), 245-259.
2. Bloom, B. S. (1976). Human characteristics and school learning. NY: McGraw-Hill.
3. Campos, M. (2005). A constructivist method for the analysis of networked cognitive communication and the assessment of collaborative learning and knowledge building, JALN, 8 (2), 2004 (Retrieved January 20, 2007 from http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v8n2/index.asp).
4. Calendra, B., & Lee, J. (2005).The digital history and pedagogy project: Creating an interpretative pedagogical historical website, The Internet and Higher Education, 8, 323-333.
5. Carroll, J. B. (1963). A model of school learning, Teacher College Record, 64 (8), 722-733.
6. Carroll, J. B. (1989). The Carroll Model-A 25-year retrospective and prospective view. Educational Research, 18 (1), 26-31.
7. Colby, S. R & Colby, R. (2008). A Pedagogical of Play: Integrating Computer Games into the Writing Classroom. Computer and Composition, 25(3), 300-312.
8. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper Perennial.
9. Davidovitch, L., Parush, A., & Shtub, A. (2008). Simulation-based learning: the learning-forgetting-relearning process and impact of learning history. Computer & Education, 50, 866-880.
10. Finneran, C. M., & Zhang, P. (2003). A person-artifact-task (PAT) model of flow antecedents in computermediated environments. International Journal of Human computer Studies, 475-496.
11. Gee, J. P. (2003). What Video Games have to Teach us About Learning and Literacy. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
12. Hwang, W. Y., Chang C. B., & Chen G. J. (2004). The relationship of learning traits, motivation and performance-learning response dynamics, Computer & Education, 42, 267-287.
13. Hayes, S., Capel, S., & Cook, P. (2008). An examination of knowledge prioritization in secondary physical education teacher education courses. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 330-342.
14. Işman, A., & Çelikli, G. E. (2009). How does student ability and self-efficacy affect the usage of computer technology? The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8 (1), 33-38.
15. Jonassen D. H. (2006). Modeling with technology: Mind tools for conceptual change. Columbus, OH: Merill Prentice Hall.
16. Johnston, K., & Aldrige, B. (1985). Examining a mathematical model of masyery learning in a classroom setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22 (6), 543-554.
17. Juul, J. (2002). The open and the Closed: Games of Emergence and Games of progression. In Computer games and Digital Cultures conference Proceeding, Tampere University Press, 323-329.
18. Kiili, K. (2005a). Digital game-based learning: Towards an experiential gamming model. Internet and Higher Education, 8, 13-24.
19. Koc, M., & Bakir, N. (2010). A needs assessment survey to investigate pre-service teachers' knowledge, experiences and perceptions about preparation to using educational technologies. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(1), 13-22.
20. Koster, R. (2005). A theory of fun for game design. Scottsdale: Paraglyph Press.
21. Moreno, R. (2006). Learning in high-tech multimedia Environments. Association for Psychological Science, 15 (2), 63-67.
22. Oblinger, D. (2004). The next generation of educational engagement, Journal of Interactive Media in Education,2004(8),1-18.
23. Papastergiou, M. (2009). Digital Game-Based Learning in high school Computer Science education: Impact on educational effectiveness and student motivation. Computer & Education, 52, 1-12.
24. Perkins, D. N. (1991). Technology meets constructivism: Do they make a marriage? Educational Technology, 31 (5), 18-23.
25. Pilke, E. M. (2004). Flow experiences in information technology use. International journal of Human Computer Studies, 61, 347-357.
26. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital game-based learning. McGraw-Hill, USA.
27. Radford, A. (2001). Games and Learning about form in architecture. Automation in Construction, 9, 379-459.
28. Rosinski, P., & Squire, M. (2009). Strange bedfellows: Human-computer interaction, interface design, and composition pedagogy. Computer and Composition, 26, 149-163.
29. Stevenson, I. J. (2007). Tool, tutor, environment or resource: Exploring metaphors for digital technology and pedagogy using activity theory, Computer & Education, 1-18.
30. Seufert, T. (2003). Supporting coherence formation in learning from multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 13, 227-237.
31. Teo, T. (2009b). Examining the relationship between student teachers' self-efficacy believes and their intended used of technology for teaching: A structural equation modeling approach. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8(4), 7-15.
32. Tutgun, A., & Deniz, L. (2010). Problematic Internet Usage Among Prospective Teachers, International Educational Technology Conference (IETC), Boǧaziçi University, İstanbul, April 1226-1235.
33. Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language, Cambridge, MA: The MIT press.
34. Zeichner, K. (2007). Accumulating knowledge across self-studies in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 58, 36-46.
35. Zwart, R. C., Wubbels, Th., Bolhuis, S., & Bergen, Th. C. M. (2008). Teacher learning through reciprocal peer coaching: An analysis of activity sequences. Teaching and Teacher Education. 24, 982-1002.