Antioxidant multi-walled carbon nanotubes by free radical grafting of gallic acid: New materials for biomedical applications

Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology

Volumn 63, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 179-188

  Cirillo, Giuseppe ^a   Hampel, Silke ^b   Klingeler, Rüdiger ^b,c   Puoci, Francesco ^a   Iemma, Francesca ^a   Curcio, Manuela ^a   Parisi, Ortensia Ilaria ^a   Spizzirri, Umile Gianfranco ^a   Picci, Nevio ^a   Leonhardt, Albrecht ^b   Ritschel, Manfred ^b   Büchner, Bernd ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALABRIA   (Italy)

^b IFW DRESDEN   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

antioxidant materials; carbon nanotubes; gallic acid; radical grafting

Indexed keywords

1,1 DIPHENYL 2 PICRYLHYDRAZYL; ACETYLCHOLINESTERASE; CARBON; CARBON NANOTUBE; FREE RADICAL; GALLIC ACID; HYDROXYL RADICAL; PEROXY RADICAL;

ANTIOXIDANT ACTIVITY; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; FIXED BED REACTOR; FLUORESCENCE; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 78751514621     PISSN: 00223573     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.2010.01211.x     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Chen BX, et al. Antigenicity of fullerenes: antibodies specific for fullerenes and their characteristics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95: 10809-10813.
2. Iijima S, Ichihashi T,. Single-shell carbon nanotubes of 1-nm diameter. Nature 1993; 363: 603-605.
3. Iijima S,. Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature 1991; 354: 56-58.
4. Zhu HW, et al. Direct synthesis of long single-walled carbon nanotube strands. Science 2002; 296: 884-886.
5. Foldvari M, Bagonluri M,. Carbon nanotubes as functional excipients for nanomedicines: I. pharmaceutical properties. Nanomedicine 2008; 4: 173-182.
6. Bianco A, Prato M,. Can Carbon Nanotubes Be Considered Useful Tools for Biological Applications? Adv Mater 2003; 15: 1765-1768.
7. Chen RJ, et al. Noncovalent functionalization of carbon nanotubes for highly specific electronic biosensors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 100: 4984-4989.
8. Wang J, et al. Electrochemical detection of DNA hybridization based on carbon-nanotubes loaded with CdS tags. Electrochem Commun 2003; 5: 1000-1004.
9. Penn SG, et al. Nanoparticles for bioanalysis. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2003; 7: 609-615.
10. Mitchell DT,. Smart nanotubes for bioseparations and biocatalysis. J Am Chem Soc 2002; 124: 11864-11865.
11. Park KH,. Single-walled carbon nanotubes are a new class of ion channel blockers. J Biol Chem 2003; 278: 50212-50216.
12. Ke PC, Qiao R,. Carbon nanomaterials in biological systems. J Phys Condens Matter 2007; 19: 373101-373126.
13. Pantarotto D, et al. Translocation of bioactive peptides across cell membranes by carbon nanotubes. Chem Commun 2004; 10: 16-17.
14. Hu H, et al. Chemically functionalized carbon nanotubes as substrates for neuronal growth. Nano Lett 2004; 4: 507-511.
15. Wang J, et al. Ultrasensitive electrical biosensing of proteins and DNA: carbon-nanotube derived amplification of the recognition and transduction events. J Am Chem Soc 2004; 126: 3010-3011.
16. Klingeler R, et al. Carbon nanotube based biomedical agents for heating, temperature sensoring and drug delivery. Int J Hyperthermia 2008; 24: 496-505.
17. Hampel S, et al. Carbon nanotubes filled with a chemotherapeutic agent: a nanocarrier mediates inhibition of tumor cell growth. Nanomedicine 2008; 3: 175-182.
18. Kostarelos K, et al. Cellular uptake of functionalized carbon nanotubes is independent of functional group and cell type. Nat Nanotechnol 2007; 2: 108-113.
19. Colvin VL,. The potential environmental impact of engineered nanomaterials. Nat Biotechnol 2003; 21: 1166-1170.
20. Sakamoto Y, et al. Induction of mesothelioma by a single intrascrotal administration of multi-walled carbon nanotube in intact male Fisher 344 rats. J Toxicol Sci 2009; 1: 65-76.
21. Crouzier D, et al. Carbon nanotubes induce inflammation but decrease the production of reactive oxygen species in lung. Toxicology 2010; 272: 39-45.
22. Poland CA, et al. Carbon nanotubes introduced into the abdominal cavity of mice show asbestos-like pathogenicity in a pilot study. Nature Nanotechnol 2008; 3: 423-428.
23. Han X, et al. Dietary polyphenols and their biological significance. Int J Mol Sci 2007; 8: 950-988.
24. Hayes JD, McLellan LI,. Glutathione and glutathione-dependent enzymes represent a co-ordinately regulated defence against oxidative stress. Free Radic Res 1999; 31: 273-300.
25. Iemma F, et al. Iron (III) chelation and antioxidant properties of myo-inositol phosphorylated polymeric microspheres. J Pharm Pharmacol 2007; 59: 597-601.
26. Rasool MK, et al. Hepatoprotective and antioxidant effects of gallic acid in paracetamol-induced liver damage in mice. J Pharm Pharmacol 2010; 5: 638-643.
27. Hollman PC, et al. Relative bioavailability of the antioxidant flavonoid quercetin from various foods in man. FEBS Lett 1997; 418: 152-156.
28. Fukumoto LR, Mazza G,. Assessing antioxidant and prooxidant activities of phenolic compounds. J Agric Food Chem 2000; 48: 3597-3604.
29. Lin JK, et al. Survey of catechins, gallic acid, and methylxanthines in green, oolong, pu-erh, and black teas. J Agric Food Chem 1998; 46: 3635-3642.
30. Negi AS, et al. Synthesis of a novel plant growth promoter from gallic acid. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2005; 15: 1243-1247.
31. Jang A, et al. Biological functions of a synthetic compound, octadeca-9,12-dienyl-3,4,5-hydroxybenzoate, from gallic acid-linoleic acid ester. Food Chem 2009; 112: 369-373.
32. Wang H, et al. Isocratic elution system for the determination of catechins, caffeine and gallic acid in green tea using HPLC. Food Chem 2000; 68: 115-121.
33. Ritschel M, et al. Rhenium-catalyzed growth carbon nanotubes. J Phys Chem C 2007; 111: 8414-8417.
34. Spielmann H, et al. IRAG working group 2. CAM-based assays. Interagency Regulatory Alternatives Group. Food Chem Toxicol 1997; 35: 39-66.
35. Pan Y, et al. Antioxidant activity of ethanolic extract of Cortex fraxini and use in peanut oil. Food Chem 2007; 103: 913-918. (Pubitemid 46283239)
36. Prieto P, et al. Spectrophotometric quantitation of antioxidant capacity through the formation of a phosphomolybdenum complex: specific application to the determination of vitamin E. Anal Biochem 1997; 269: 337-341.
37. Ardestani A, Yazdanparast R,. Antioxidant and free radical scavenging potential of Achillea santolina extracts. Food Chem 2007; 104: 21-29.
38. Bartosz M, et al. Antioxidant and prooxidant properties of captopril and enalapril. Free Radic Biol Med 1997; 23: 729-735.
39. Ismail A, et al. Total antioxidant activity and phenolic content in selected vegetables. Food Chem 2004; 87: 581-586.
40. Park M, Jung M,. Acetylcholinesterase inhibition by flavonoids from Agrimonia pilosa. Molecules 2007; 12: 2130-2139.
41. Kozhuharova-Koseva R, et al. Relation between growth parameters and morphology of vertically aligned Fe-filled carbon nanotubes. Fuller Nanotub Car N 2007; 25: 135-143. (Pubitemid 46407881)
42. Holzinger M, et al. Sidewall functionalization of carbon nanotubes. Angew Chem Int Edit 2001; 40: 4002-4005.
43. Yan D, Yang G,. A novel approach of in situ grafting polyamide 6 to the surface of multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Mat Lett 2009; 63: 298-300.
44. Ni B, Sinnott SB,. Chemical functionalization of carbon nanotubes through energetic radical collisions. Phys Rev B 2000; 61: R16343-R16346.
45. Puoci F, et al. Synthesis of methacrylic-ferulic acid copolymer with antioxidant properties by single-step free radical polymerization. J Agric Food Chem 2008; 56: 10646-10650.
46. Simms RW, Cunningham MF,. High molecular weight poly(butyl methacrylate) by reverse atom transfer radical polymerization in miniemulsion initiated by a redox system. Macromolecules 2007; 40: 860-866.
47. Vinardell MP, Mitjans M,. Alternative methods for eye and skin irritation tests: an overview. J Pharm Sci 2008; 97: 46-59.
48. Spielmann H,. Ocular irritation. In:, Castle JV, Gomez MJ, eds. In Vitro Methods in Pharmaceutical Research. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1997: 265-287.
49. Barile FA,. Validating and troubleshooting ocular in vitro toxicology tests. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 2010; 61: 136-145.
50. Valdes TI, et al. The chick chorioallantoic membrane as a novel in vivo model for the testing of biomaterials. J Biomed Mater Res 2002; 62: 273-282.
51. AraÃjo J, et al. Effect of polymer viscosity on physicochemical properties and ocular tolerance of FB-loaded PLGA nanospheres. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2009; 72: 48-56.
52. Schrage A, et al. Experiences with the HET-CAM method in the routine testing of a broad variety of chemicals and formulations. Altern Lab Anim 2010; 38: 39-52.
53. Gupta H, et al. Sparfloxacin-loaded PLGA nanoparticles for sustained ocular drug delivery. Nanomedicine 2010; 6: 324-333.
54. Jimenez N, et al. Methyl trypsin loaded poly(D,L-Lactide-Coglycolide) nanoparticles for contact lens care. J Pharm Sci 2010; 99: 1414-1426.
55. Wolf NB, et al. Influences of opioids and nanoparticles on in vitro wound healing models. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2009; 73: 34-42.
56. Morell MK, Myers AM,. Towards the rational design of cereal starches. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2005; 8: 204-210.
57. Li Y, et al. Antioxidant and free radical-scavenging activities of chickpea protein hydrolysate (CPH). Food Chem 2008; 106: 444-450.
58. Ramassamy C,. Emerging role of polyphenolic compounds in the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases: a review of their intracellular targets. Eur J Pharmacol 2006; 545: 51-64.