CAM-based assays

Food and Chemical Toxicology

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 39-66

  Spielmann, H ^a   Liebsch, M ^a   Moldenhauer, F ^a   Holzhutter H G ^b   Bagley, D M ^c   Lipman, J M ^d   Pape, W J W ^e   Miltenburger, H ⁱ   De Silva, O ^f   Hofer, H ^g   Steiling, W ^h  

^a FEDERAL INSTITUTE FOR RISK ASSESSMENT   (Germany)

^b HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c Oral Care Research and Development   (United States)

^d HOFFMANN LA ROCHE INC   (United States)

^e BEIERSDORF AG   (Germany)

^f L ORÉAL RECHERCHE   (France)

^g AIT AUSTRIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

^h HENKEL KGAA   (Germany)

ⁱ NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL DERIVATIVE; ALDEHYDE; AMINE; AMINO ACID; AMINOSUGAR; ANIONIC SURFACTANT; COSMETIC; DETERGENT; DOMESTIC CHEMICAL; ESTER; ETHER DERIVATIVE; FATTY ACID; FATTY ALCOHOL; HETEROCYCLIC COMPOUND; INDUSTRIAL CHEMICAL; IRRITANT AGENT; KETONE; NITRILE; NITRO DERIVATIVE; ORGANOPHOSPHATE; PURINE DERIVATIVE; SHAMPOO; SURFACTANT;

CHICK EMBRYO; CHORION; CONFERENCE PAPER; EYE IRRITATION; FETUS MEMBRANE; IN VITRO STUDY; TOXICITY TESTING; ANIMAL; ANIMAL TESTING ALTERNATIVE; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHEMICALLY INDUCED DISORDER; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DRUG EFFECT; EYE; EYE DISEASE; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; RABBIT; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICS;

GALLUS GALLUS;

ALLANTOIS; ANIMAL TESTING ALTERNATIVES; ANIMALS; CHICK EMBRYO; CHORION; EYE; EYE DISEASES; IRRITANTS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RABBITS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STATISTICS;

EID: 0030637864     PISSN: 02786915     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0278-6915(96)00103-2     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Bagley D. M., Bruner L. H., de Silva O., Cottin M., O'Brien K. A. F., Uttley M. and Walker A. P. (1992) An evaluation of five potential alternatives in vitro to the rabbit eye irritation test in vivo. Toxicology in Vitro 6, 275-284.
2. Bagley D. M., Rizvi P. Y., Kong B. M. and De Salva S. J. (1988) An improved CAM assay for predicting ocular irritation potential. In Progress in In Vitro Toxicology, Alternative Methods in Toxicology. Vol. 6. pp. 131-138. Edited by A. M. Golberg. Mary Ann Liebert, New York.
3. Bagley D. M., Rizvi P. Y., Kong B. M. and De Salva S. J. (1991a) Factors affecting use of the hen's egg chorioallantoic membrane as a model for predicting eye irritation potential: I. Journal of Toxicology-Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology 10, 95-104.
4. Bagley D. M., Rizvi P. Y., Kong B. M. and De Salva S. J. (1991b) Evaluation of the vascular components of the chorioallantoic membrane assay as a model for eye irritation potential: II. Journal of Toxicology-Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology 10, 105-113.
5. Balls M., Blaauboer B., Brusik D., Frazier J., Lamb D., Pemberton M., Reinhardt C., Robertfroid M., Rosenkranz H., Schmid B., Spielmann H., Stammati A. L. and Walum E. (1990) Report and recommendations of the CAAT/ERGATT workshop on the validation of toxicity test procedures. ATLA 18, 313-337.
6. Balls M., Botham P. A., Bruner L. H. and Spielmann, H. (1995) The EC/HO international validation study on alternatives to the Draize eye irritation test for classification and labellling of chemicals. Toxicology in Vitro 9, 871-929.
7. Bartnik F. G., Kästner W., Künstler K. and Sterzel W. (1988) Bewertung der lokalen Verträglichkeit von Tensiden mittels in vitro Methoden. Seifen-Öle-Fette-Wachse 114, 41-47.
8. Chambers W. A., Green S., Gupta K. C., Hills R. N., Huntley K., Hurley P. M., Lambert L. A., Lee C. C., Lee J. K., Liu P. T., Lowther D. K., Roberts C. D., Seabaugh V. M., Springer J. A. and Wilcox N. L. (1993) Scoring for eye irritation test. Food and Chemical Toxicology 31, 111-115.
9. Colquhoun D. (1971) Lectures on Biostatistics. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
10. Gettings S. D., Bagley D. M., Demetrulias J. L., Dipasquale L. C., Hintze K. L., Rozen M. G., Teal J. J., Weise S. L., Chudkowski M., Marenus K. D., Pape W. J. W., Roddy M. T., Schnetzinger R., Silber P. M., Glaza S. M. and Kurtz P. J. (1991) The CTFA Evaluation of Alternatives Program: An evaluation of in vitro alternatives to the Draize primary eye irritation test. (Phase I) Hydroalcoholic formulations; (Part 2) Data analysis and biological significance. In Vitro Toxicology 4, 247-288.
11. Gettings S. D., Bagley D. M., Chudkowski M., Demetrulias J. L., Dipasquale L. C., Galli C. L., Gay R., Hintze K. L., Janus J., Marenus K. D., Muscatiello M. J., Pape W. J. W., Renskers K. J., Roddy M. T. and Schnetzinger R. (1992) The CTFA Evaluation of Alternatives Program: Development of potential alternatives to the Draize eye test. (Phase II) Review of materials and methods. ATLA 20, 164-171.
12. Gettings S. D., Dipasquale L. C., Bagley D. M., Casterton P. L., Chudkowski M., Curren R. D., Demetrulias J. L., Feder P. I., Galli C. L., Gay R., Glaza S. M., Hintze K. L., Janus J., Kurtz P. J., Lordo R. A., Marenus K. D., Moral J., Muscatiello M., Pape W. J. W., Renskers K. J., Roddy M. T. and Rozen M. G. (1994a) The CTFA Evaluation of Alternatives Program: An evaluation of in vitro alternatives to the Draize primary eye irritation test. (Phase II) Oil/water emulsions. Food and Chemical Toxicology 32, 943-976.
13. Gettings S. D., Hintze K. L., Bagley D. M., Casterton P. L., Chudkowski M., Curren R. D., Demetrulias J. L., Dipasquale L. C., Earl L. K., Feder P. I., Galli C. L., Gay R., Glaza S. M., Gordon V. C., Janus J., Kurtz P. J., Lordo R. A., Marenus K. D., Moral J., Pape W. J. W., Renskers K. J., Rheins L. A., Roddy M. T., Rozen M. G., Tedeschi J. P. and Zyracki J. (1994b) The CTFA Evaluation of Alternatives Program. (Phase III) Surfactant-based formulations. World Congress on Alternatives and Animal Use in the Life Sciences, Baltimore, MD, USA, Nov. 14-19, 1993. In Vitro Toxicology 7, 166.
14. Grimm H. and Recknagel R. D. (1985) Grundkurs Biostatistik. 1st Ed. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena, Germany.
15. IRAG (1993) Guidelines for the evaluation of eye irritation alternative tests: Criteria for data submissions. Working Group 6. Draft Report. Interagency Regulatory Alternatives Group, Washington, DC.
16. Kalweit S., Besoke R., Gerner I. and Spielmann H. (1990) A national validation project of alternative methods to the Draize rabbit eye test. Toxicology in Vitro 4, 702-706.
17. Kong B., Viau C., Rizvi P. and De Salva S. (1987) The development and evaluation of the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay. In Alternative Methods in Toxicology. Vol. 5. In Vitro Toxicology, Approaches to Validation. p. 163. Edited by A. M. Golberg. Mary Ann Liebert, New York.
18. Leighton J., Nassauer J. and Tchao R. (1985) The chick embryo in toxicology: an alternative to the rabbit eye. Food and Chemical Toxicology 23, 293-298.
19. Lozán L. (1992) Angewandte Statistik für Naturwissenschaftler. Pareys Studientexte; Nr. 74, Berlin, Hamburg.
20. Luepke N. P. (1985) Hen's egg chorioallantoic membrane test for irritation potential. Food and Chemical Toxicology 23, 287-291.
21. Luepke N. P. and Kemper F. H. (1986) HET-CAM: an alternative to the Draize eye test. Food and Chemical Toxicology 24, 495-496.
22. OECD (1981) Guidelines for testing of chemicals. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris.
23. OECD (1994) Guidelines for testing of chemicals. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris.
24. Spielmann H., Gerner I., Kalweit S., Moog R., Wirnsberger T., Krauser K., Kreiling R., Kreuzer H., Luepke N. P., Miltenburger H. G., Müller N., Mürmann P., Pape W., Siegemund B., Spengler J., Steiling W. and Wiebel F. (1991) Interlaboratory assessment of alternatives to the Draize eye irritation test in Germany. Toxicology in Vitro 5, 539-542.
25. Spielmann H., Kalweit S., Liebsch M., Wirnsberger T., Gerner I., Bertram-Neis E., Krauser K., Kreiling R., Miltenburger H. G., Pape W. and Steiling W. (1993) Validation study of alternatives to the Draize eye irritation test in Germany: cytotoxicity testing and HET-CAM test with 136 industrial chemicals. Toxicology in Vitro 7, 505-510.
26. Spielmann H., Liebsch M., Moldenhauer F. H. G., Holzhütter H. G. and de Silva O. (1995) Modern biostatistical methods for assessing in vitro/in vivo correlation in a validation trial on in vitro alternatives to the Draize eye test. Toxicology in Vitro 9, 549-556.
27. Sterzel W., Bartnik F. G., Matthies W., Kästner W. and Künstler K. (1990) Comparison of two in vitro and two in vivo methods for the measurement of irritancy. Toxicology in Vitro 4, 698-701.
28. Weber E. (1986) Grundriss der biologischen Statistik: Anwendung d. math. Statistik in Forschung, Lehre u. Praxis. 9th Ed. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart.
29. Weil C. S. and Scala R. A. (1971) Study of intra-and interlaboratory variability in the results of rabbit eye and skin irritation tests. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 19, 276-360.