Copy number alterations among mammalian enzymes cluster in the metabolic network

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 1111-1121

  Bekaert, Michaël ^a   Conant, Gavin C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

comparative genomic; gene dosage; gene duplication; mammals; metabolic networks and pathways; milk

Indexed keywords

ENZYME; MAMMALIAN ENZYME; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CATTLE; COPY NUMBER ALTERATION; EVOLUTION; GENE DOSAGE; GENETIC DRIFT; GENOMICS; HUMAN; LACTATION; MAMMAL; METABOLISM; MILK PRODUCTION; NONHUMAN;

ANIMALS; CATTLE; GENE DOSAGE; HUMANS; MAMMALS; MEMBRANE TRANSPORT PROTEINS; METABOLIC NETWORKS AND PATHWAYS; MILK;

BOS; MAMMALIA;

EID: 78751469014     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msq296     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:3389-3402.
2. Bada JL, Lazcano A. 2002. Origin of life. Some like it hot, but not the first biomolecules. Science 296:1982-1983.
3. Bastian M, Heymann S, Jacomy M. 2009. Gephi: an Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks. International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.
4. Bergthorsson U, Andersson DI, Roth JR. 2007. Ohno's dilemma: evolution of new genes under continuous selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 104:17004-17009.
5. Birchler JA, Veitia RA. 2007. The gene balance hypothesis: from classical genetics to modern genomics. Plant Cell. 19:395-402.
6. Blank LM, Lehmbeck F, Sauer U. 2005. Metabolic-flux and network analysis of fourteen hemiascomycetous yeasts. FEMS Yeast Res. 5:545-558.
7. Brandes U. 2001. A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality. J Math Sociol. 25:163-177.
8. Brown CJ, Todd KM, Rosenzweig RF. 1998. Multiple duplications of yeast hexose transport genes in response to selection in a glucose-limited environment. Mol Biol Evol. 15:931-942.
9. Caetano-Anollés G, Kim HS, Mittenthal JE. 2007. The origin of modern metabolic networks inferred from phylogenomic analysis of protein architecture. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 104:9358-9363.
10. Coleman TF, More JJ. 1983. Estimation of sparse Jacobian matrices and graph coloring blems. SIAM J Num Anal. 20:187-209.
11. Conant GC. 2009. Neutral evolution on mammalian protein surfaces. Trends Genet. 25:377-381.
12. Conant GC, Wagner A. 2002. GenomeHistory: a software tool and its application to fully sequenced genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:3378-3386.
13. Conant GC, Wolfe KH. 2007. Increased glycolytic flux as an outcome of whole-genome duplication in yeast. Mol Syst Biol. 3:129.
14. Conant GC, Wolfe KH. 2008. Turning a hobby into a job: how duplicated genes find new functions. Nat Rev Genet. 9:938-950.
15. De Oliveira Dal'Molin CG, Quek LE, Palfreyman RW, Brumbley SM, Nielsen LK. 2010. AraGEM, a genome-scale reconstruction of the primary metabolic network in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 152:579-589.
16. Duarte NC, Becker SA, Jamshidi N, Thiele I, Mo ML, Vo TD, Srivas R, Palsson BO. 2007. Global reconstruction of the human metabolic network based on genomic and bibliomic data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 104:1777-1782.
17. Duarte NC, Herrgard MJ, Ø B, Palsson . 2004. Reconstruction and validation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae iND750, a fully compartmentalized genome-scale metabolic model. Genome Res. 14:1298-1309.
18. Edger PP, Pires JC. 2009. Gene and genome duplications: the impact of dosage-sensitivity on the fate of nuclear genes. Chromosome Res. 17:699-717.
19. Flicek P, Aken BL, Ballester B, et al. 57 co-authors. 2010. Ensembl's 10th year. Nucleic Acids Res. 38:D557-D562.
20. Francino MP. 2005. An adaptive radiation model for the origin of new gene functions. Nat Genet. 37:573-577.
21. Freeling M, Thomas BC. 2006. Gene-balanced duplications, like tetraploidy, provide predictable drive to increase morphological complexity. Genome Res. 16:805-814.
22. Fruchterman TMJ, Reingold EM. 1991. Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Software: Pract Exp. 21:1129-1164.
23. Gonzalez E, Kulkarni H, Bolivar H, et al. (21 co-authors). 2005. The influence of CCL3L1 gene-containing segmental duplications on HIV-1/AIDS susceptibility. Science 307:1434-1440.
24. Grisart B, Coppieters W, Farnir F, et al. (13 co-authors). 2002. Positional candidate cloning of a QTL in dairy cattle: identification of a missense mutation in the bovine DGAT1 gene with major effect on milk yield and composition. Genome Res. 12:222-231.
25. Hammon HM, Bellmann O, Voigt J, Schneider F, Kuhn C. 2007. Glucose-dependent insulin response and milk production in heifers within a segregating resource family population. J Dairy Sci. 90:3247-3254.
26. Huss M, Holme P. 2007. Currency and commodity metabolites: their identification and relation to the modularity of metabolic networks. IET Syst Biol. 1:280-285.
27. Ingvartsen KL, Friggens NC. 2005. To what extent do variabilities in hormones, metabolites and energy intake explain variability in milk yield? Domest Anim Endocrinol. 29:294-304.
28. Jensen RG. 1995. Handbook of milk composition. San Diego (CA): Academic Press.
29. Jeong H, Tombor B, Albert R, Oltvai ZN, Barabási A-L. 2000. The large-scale organization of metabolic networks. Nature 407:651-654.
30. Kanehisa M, Goto S, Furumichi M, Tanabe M, Hirakawa M. 2010. KEGG for representation and analysis of molecular networks involving diseases and drugs. Nucleic Acids Res. 38:D355-D360.
31. Kondrashov FA, Kondrashov AS. 2006. Role of selection in fixation of gene duplications. J Theor Biol. 239:141-151.
32. Lemay DG, Lynn DJ, Martin WF, et al. (19 co-authors). 2009. The bovine lactation genome: insights into the evolution of mammalian milk. Genome Biol. 10:R43.
33. Le Novere N, Bornstein B, Broicher A, et al. (12 co-authors). 2006. BioModels database: a free, centralized database of curated, published, quantitative kinetic models of biochemical and cellular systems. Nucleic Acids Res. 34:D689-D691.
34. Lynch M, Conery JS. 2003. The origins of genome complexity. Science 302:1401-1404.
35. Ma H, Sorokin A, Mazein A, Selkov A, Selkov E, Demin O, Goryanin I. 2007. The Edinburgh human metabolic network reconstruction and its functional analysis. Mol Syst Biol. 3:135.
36. Morowitz HJ, Kostelnik JD, Yang J, Cody GD. 2000. The origin of intermediary metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 97:7704-7708.
37. Murphy WJ, Pringle TH, Crider TA, Springer MS, Miller W. 2007. Using genomic data to unravel the root of the placental mammal phylogeny. Genome Res. 17:413-421.
38. Murphy WJ, Stanyon R, O'Brien SJ. 2001. Evolution of mammalian genome organization inferred from comparative gene mapping. Genome Biol. 2:REVIEWS0005.
39. Nair S, Miller B, Barends M, Jaidee A, Patel J, Mayxay M, Newton P, Nosten F, Ferdig MT, Anderson TJ. 2008. Adaptive copy number evolution in malaria parasites. PLoS Genet. 4:e1000243.
40. Nakajima K-I, Nakamura M, Ishisaki A, Kozakai T. 2009. Synergistic effect of dexamethasone and prolactin on VEGF expression in bovine mammary epithelial cells via p44/p42 MAP kinase (vascular endothelial growth factor, mitogen-activated protein kinase). Australas J Anim Sci. 22:788-795.
41. Newman ME. 2006. Modularity and community structure in networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 103:8577-8582.
42. Ohno S. 1970. Evolution by gene duplication. New York: Springer.
43. Opsahl T, Agneessens F, Skvoretz J. 2010. Node centrality in weighted networks: generalizing degree and shortest paths. Soc Netw. 32:245-251.
44. Papp B, Pál C, Hurst LD. 2003. Dosage sensitivity and the evolution of gene families in yeast. Nature 424:194-197.
45. Papp B, Pál C, Hurst LD. 2004. Metabolic network analysis of the causes and evolution of enzyme dispensability in yeast. Nature 429:661-664.
46. Payer B, Lee JT. 2008. X chromosome dosage compensation: how mammals keep the balance. Annu Rev Genet. 42:733-772.
47. Perry GH, Dominy NJ, Claw KG, et al. (13 co-authors). 2007. Diet and the evolution of human amylase gene copy number variation. Nat Genet. 39:1256-1260.
48. Prasad AB, Allard MW, Green ED. 2008. Confirming the phylogeny of mammals by use of large comparative sequence data sets. Mol Biol Evol. 25:1795-1808.
49. Raymond J, Segre D. 2006. The effect of oxygen on biochemical networks and the evolution of complex life. Science 311:1764-1767.
50. Roth JR, Andersson DI. 2004. Adaptive mutation: how growth under selection stimulates Lac(\+) reversion by increasing target copy number. J Bacteriol. 186:4855-4860.
51. Sabidussi G. 1966. The centrality index of a graph. Psychometrika 31:581-603.
52. Selvarasu S, Karimi IA, Ghim GH, Lee DY. 2010. Genome-scale modeling and in silico analysis of mouse cell metabolic network. Mol Biosyst. 6:152-161.
53. Sheikh K, Forster J, Nielsen LK. 2005. Modeling hybridoma cell metabolism using a generic genome-scale metabolic model of Mus musculus. Biotechnol Prog. 21:112-121.
54. Smith E, Morowitz HJ. 2004. Universality in intermediary metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 101:13168-13173.
55. Spitsberg VL. 2005. Invited review: bovine milk fat globule membrane as a potential nutraceutical. J Dairy Sci. 88:2289-2294.
56. Steinke D, Hoegg S, Brinkmann H, Meyer A. 2006. Three rounds (1R/ 2R/3R) of genome duplications and the evolution of the glycolytic pathway in vertebrates. BMC Biol. 4:16.
57. Stranger BE, Forrest MS, Dunning M, et al. (17 co-authors). 2007. Relative impact of nucleotide and copy number variation on gene expression phenotypes. Science 315:848-853.
58. Vitkup D, Kharchenko P, Wagner A. 2006. Influence of metabolic network structure and function on enzyme evolution. Genome Biol. 7:R39.