Influence of metabolic network structure and function on enzyme evolution

Genome Biology

Volumn 7, Issue 5, 2006, Pages

  Vitkup, Dennis ^a   Kharchenko, Peter ^b   Wagner, Andreas ^c  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENZYME;

ARTICLE; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; ENZYME ANALYSIS; ENZYME MECHANISM; GENE DELETION; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENE MUTATION; GENOME ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; OPEN READING FRAME; PROTEIN INTERACTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; YEAST; AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; ENZYMOLOGY; GENETICS; METABOLISM; POINT MUTATION;

AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ENZYMES; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE DUPLICATION; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POINT MUTATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 33745107471     PISSN: 1474760X     EISSN: 1474760X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/gb-2006-7-5-r39     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Jeong H, Mason SP, Barabasi AL, Oltvai ZN: Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature 2001, 411:41-42.
2. Hirsh AE, Fraser HB: Protein dispensability and rate of evolution. Nature 2001, 411:1046-1049.
3. Pal C, Papp B, Hurst LD: Highly expressed genes in yeast evolve slowly. Genetics 2001, 158:927-931.
4. Fraser HB, Hirsh AE, Steinmetz LM, Scharfe C, Feldman MW: Evolutionary rate in the protein interaction network. Science 2002, 296:750-752.
5. Jordan IK, Wolf DM, Koonin EV: No simple dependence between protein evolution rate and the number of protein-protein interactions: only the most prolific interactors tend to evolve slowly. BMC Evol Biol 2003, 3:1-12.
6. Hahn MW, Conant GC, Wagner A: Molecular evolution in large genetic networks: does connectivity equal constraint? J Mol Evol 2004, 58:203-211.
7. Mering C, Krause R, Snel B, Cornell M, Oliver SG, Fields S, Bork P: Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein-protein interactions. Nature 2002, 417:399-403.
8. Spinzak E, Sattah S, Margalit H: How reliable are experimental protein-protein interaction data? J Mol Biol 2003, 327:919-923.
9. Karp PD, Paley S, Romero P: The Pathway Tools software. Bioinformatics 2002, 18:5225-5232.
10. Forster J, Famili I, Fu P, Palsson BO, Nielsen J: Genome-scale reconstruction of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolic network. Genome Res 2003, 13:244-253.
11. Edwards JS, Palsson BO: The Escherichia coil MG1655 in silico, metabolic genotype: its definition, characteristics, and capabilities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000, 97:5528-5533.
12. Kharchenko P, Vitkup D, Church GM: Filling gaps in a metabolic network using expression information. Bioinformatics 2004, 20:1178-1185.
13. Li W-H: Molecular Evolution Sunderland: Sinauer Associates; 1997.
14. Kellis M, Patterson N, Endrizzi M, Birren B, Lander ES: Sequencing and comparison of yeast species to identify genes and regulatory elements. Nature 2003, 423:241-254.
15. Yang Z, Nielsen R: Estimating synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution rates under realistic evolutionary models. Mol Biol Evol 2000, 17:32-43.
16. Holstege FC, Jennings EG, Wyrick JJ, Lee TI, Hengartner CJ, Green MR, Golub TR, Lander ES, Young RA: Dissecting the regulatory circuitry of a eukaryotic genome. Cell 1998, 95:717-728.
17. Varma A, Boesch BW, Palsson BO: Biochemical production capabilites of Escherichia coli. Biotech Bioeng 1993, 42:59-73.
18. Edwards JS, Ibarra RU, Palsson BO: In silico predictions of Escherichia coli metabolic capabilites are consistent with experimental data. Nat Biotechnol 2001, 19:125-130.
19. Segre D, Vitkup D, Church GM: Analysis of optimality in natural and perturbed metabolic networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002, 99:15112-12117.
20. Foster J, Famili I, Palsson BO, Nielsen J: Large-scale evaluation of in-silico, gene deletions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. OMICS 2003, 7:193-202.
21. Strathern JN, Jones EW, Broach JR: The Molecular Biology of the Yeast Saccharomyces. In Metabolism and Gene Expression Cold Spring Harbor Press, NY; 1982.
22. Papp B, Pal C, Hurst LD: Metabolic network analysis of the causes and evolution of the enzyme dispensability in yeast. Nature 2004, 429:661-664.
23. Giaever G, Chu AM, Ni L, Connelly C, Riles L, Veronneau S, Dow S, Lucau-Danila A, Anderson K, Andre B, et al.: Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 2002, 418:387-391.
24. Steinmetz LM, Scharfe C, Deutschbauer AM, Mokranjac D, Herman ZS, Jones T, Chu AM, Giaever G, Prokisch H, Oefner PJ, Davis RW: Systematic screen for human disease genes in yeast. Nat Genet 2002, 31:400-404.
25. Dwight SS, Balakrishnan R, Christie KR, Costanzo MC, Dolinski K, Engel SR, Feierboch B, Fisk DG, Hirchman J, Hong EL, et al.: Sacchoromyces genome database: underlying principles and organisation. Brief Bioinform 2004, 5:9-22.
26. Mahadevan R, Palsson BO: Properties of metabolic networks: structure versus function. Biophys J 2005, 88:L07-L09.
27. Gu Z, Steinmetz LM, Gu X, Scharfe C, Davis RW, Li WH: Role of duplicate genes in genetic robustness against null mutations. Nature 2003, 421:63-66.
28. Wagner A: Robustness against mutations in genetics networks of yeast. Nat Genet 2000, 24:355-361.
29. Edwards JS, Palsson BO: Robustness analysis of the Esherichia coli metabolic network. Biotechnol Prog 2000, 16:927-939.
30. Kuepfer L Sauer U, Blank LM: Metabolic functions of duplicate genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genome Res 2005, 15:1421-1430.
31. McAlister-Henn L, Small WC: Molecular genetics of yeast TCA cycle isozymes. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol 1997, 57:317-339.
32. Wagner A: Inferring lifestyle from gene expression patterns. Mol Biol Evol 2000, 17:1985-1987.
33. Makhorin A: GNU Linear Programming Kit Boston: Free Software Foundation; 2001.
34. Conant GC, Wagner A: GenomeHistory: a software tool and its application to fully sequenced genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2002, 30:3378-3386.
35. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ: Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acid Res 1997, 25:3389-3402.
36. Needleman SB, Wunsch CD: A general method applicable to the search for similarities for amino acid sequences of two proteins. J Mol Biol 1970, 48:443-453.
37. Muse SV, Gaut BS: A likelihood approach for comparing synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitution rates, with application to the chloroplast genome. Mol Biol Evol 1994, 11:715-724.
38. Goldman N, Yang Z: A codon-based model of nucleotide substitution for protein-coding DNA sequences. Mol Biol Evol 1994, 11:725-736.