Fast and efficient dynamic nested effects models

Bioinformatics

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 238-244

  Fröhlich, Holger ^a   Praveen, Paurush ^a   Tresch, Achim ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; METABOLISM; MOUSE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; MICE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 78651456319     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq631     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Aho,A. et al. (1972) The transitive reduction of a directed graph. SIAM J. Comput., 1, 131-137.
2. Alon,U. (2006) Introduction into Systems Biology: Design Principles of Biological Circuits. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.
3. Anchang,B. et al. (2009) Modeling the temporal interplay of molecular signaling and gene expression by using dynamic nested effects models. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 6447-6452.
4. Battle,A. et al. (2010) Automated identification of pathways from quantitative genetic interaction data. Mol. Syst. Biol., 6, 1-13.
5. Bilodeau,S. et al. (2009) Setdb1 contributes to repression of genes encoding developmental regulators and maintenance of es cell state esrrb activates oct4 transcription and sustains self-renewal and pluripotency in embryonic stem cells. Genes Dev., 23, 2484-2482.
6. Dorai-Raj,S. (2009) binom: Binomial Confidence Intervals For Several Parameterizations. R package version 1.0-5.
7. Driessche,N.V. et al. (2005) Epistasis analysis with global transcriptional phenotypes. Nat. Genet., 37, 471-477.
8. Fire,A. et al. (1998) Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in caenorhabditis elegans. Nature, 391, 806-811.
9. Fröhlich,H. et al. (2007) Large scale statistical inference of signaling pathways from RNAi and microarray data. BMC Bioinformatics, 8, 1-15.
10. Fröhlich,H. et al. (2008) Estimating large scale signaling networks through nested effect models with intervention effects from microarray data. Bioinformatics, 24, 2650-2656.
11. Fröhlich,H. et al. (2009) Nested effects models for learning signaling networks from perturbation data. Biometrical J., 2, 304-323.
12. Gat-Viks,I. et al. (2006) A probabilistic methodology for integrating knowledge and experiments on biological networks. J. Comput. Biol., 13, 165-181.
13. Ghahramani,Z. (1997) Learning dynamic Bayesian networks. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., 1387, 168-197.
14. Hubbell,E. et al. (2002) Robust estimators for expression analysis. Bioinformatics, 18, 1585-1592.
15. Ivanova,N. et al. (2006) Dissecting self-renewal in stem cells with RNA interference. Nature, 442, 533-538.
16. Kanabar,P.N. et al. (2009) Inferring disease-related pathways using a probabilistic epistasis model. Pac. Symp. Biocomput., 491, 480-491.
17. Klamt,S. et al. (2010) TRANSWESD: inferring cellular networks with transitive reduction. Bioinformatics, 26, 2160-2168.
18. Maathuis,M.H. et al. (2010) Predicting causal effects in large-scale systems from observational data. Nat. Methods, 7, 247-248.
19. Maathuis,M. et al. (2009) Estimating high-dimensional intervention effects from observational data. Ann. Stat., 37, 3133-3164.
20. Markowetz,F. et al. (2005) Non-transcriptional pathway features reconstructed from secondary effects of RNA interference. Bioinformatics, 21, 4026-4032.
21. Markowetz,F. et al. (2007) Nested effects models for high-dimensional phenotyping screens. Bioinformatics, 23, i305-i312.
22. Nelander,S. et al. (2008) Models from experiments: combinatorial drug perturbations of cancer cells. Mol. Syst. Biol., 4, 216.
23. Pearl,J. (2000) Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
24. Pe'er,D. et al. (2001) Inferring subnetworks from perturbed expression profiles. Bioinformatics, 17 (Suppl. 1), S215-S224.
25. Rogers,S. and Girolami,M. (2005) A Bayesian regression approach to the inference of regulatory networks from gene expression data. Bioinformatics, 21, 3131-3137.
26. Rung,J. et al. (2002) Building and analysing genome-wide gene disruption networks. Bioinformatics, 18 (Suppl. 2), S202-S210.
27. Sachs,K. et al. (2005) Causal protein-signaling networks derived from multiparameter single-cell data. Science, 308, 523-529.
28. Tresch,A. et al. (2007) Discrimination of direct and indirect interactions in a network of regulatory effects. J. Comput. Biol., 14, 1217-1228.
29. Tresch,A. and Markowetz,F. (2008) Structure learning in nested effects models. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol., 7.
30. Vaske,C.J. et al. (2009) A factor graph nested effects model to identify networks from genetic perturbations. PLoS Comput. Biol., 5, e1000274.
31. Wagner,A. (2001) How to reconstruct a large genetic network from n gene perturbations in fewer than n 2 easy steps. Bioinformatics, 17, 1183-1197.
32. Zeller,C. et al. (2009) A bayesian network view on nested effects models. EURASIP J. Bioinformatics Syst. Biol., 2009, 8.