Comparative evidence for the correlated evolution of polyploidy and self-compatibility in solanaceae

Evolution

Volumn 65, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 139-155

  Robertson, Kelly ^a   Goldberg, Emma E ^a   Igić, Boris ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Angiosperms; Breeding systems; Comparative methods; Polyploidy; Self incompatibility; Statistical phylogenetics

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORRELATION; DICOTYLEDON; ENZYME ACTIVITY; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENOME; PHYLOGENETICS; POLLEN; POLYPLOIDY; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; SELF INCOMPATIBILITY;

ANGIOSPERM; ARTICLE; ASEXUAL REPRODUCTION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVOLUTION; GENETIC DATABASE; GENETICS; PHYLOGENY; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT GENOME; POLYPLOIDY;

BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; DATABASES, GENETIC; GENOME, PLANT; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; POLYPLOIDY; REPRODUCTION, ASEXUAL; SOLANACEAE;

MAGNOLIOPHYTA; SOLANACEAE;

EID: 78650968520     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01099.x     Document Type: Article

References (145)

1. Acosta, M. C., A. del V. Ordonez, A. A. Cocucci, and E. A. Moscone 2006. Chromosome reports in South American Nicotianeae (Solanaceae) with particular reference to Nierembergia. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 93:634-646.
2. Ando, T., S. Iida, H. Kokubun, Y. Ueda, and E. Marchesi 1998. Distribution of infraspecific taxa of Petunia axillaris (Solanaceae) in Uruguay as revealed by discriminant analyses. Acta Phytotaxon Geobot. 45:95-109.
3. Ando, T., H. Kokubun, H. Watanabe, N. Tanaka, T. Yukawa, G. Hashimoto, E. Marchesi, E. Suarez, and I. L. Basualdo 2005. Phylogenetic analysis of Petunia sensu Jussieu (Solanaceae) using chloroplast DNA RFLP. Ann. Bot. 96:289-297.
4. Badr, A., S. F. Khalifa, Aboel-Atta, and Abou-El-Enain 1997. Chromosome criteria and taxonomic relationships in the Solanaceae. Cytologia 62:103-113.
5. Barker, M. S., N. C. Kane, M. Matvienko, A. Kozik, R. W. Michelmore, S. J. Knapp, and L. H. Riesberg 2008. Multiple paleopolyploidizations during the evolution of the Compositae reveal parallel patterns of duplicate gene retention after millions of years. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25:2445-2455.
6. Barringer, B. C. 2007. Polyploidy and self-fertilization in flowering plants. Am. J. Bot. 94:1527-1533.
7. Bawa, K. S. 1974. Breeding systems of tree species of a lowland tropical community. Evolution 28:85-92.
8. Blanc, G., and K. H. Wolfe 2004. Widespread paleopolyploidy in model plant species inferred from age distributions of duplicate genes. Plant Cell 16:1667-1678.
9. Blanc, G., A. Barakat, R. Guyot, R. Cooke, and M. Delseny 2000. Extensive duplication and reshuffling in the Arabidopsis genome. Plant Cell 12:1093-1101.
10. Blanc, G., K. Hokamp, and K. H. Wolfe 2003. A recent polyploidy superimposed on older large-scale duplications in the Arabidopsis genome. Genome Res. 13:137-144.
11. Bohs, L. 2000. Insights into the Witheringia solanacea (Solanaceae) complex in Costa Rica. I. Breeding systems and crossing studies. Biotropica 32:70-79.
12. Bohs, L. 2007. Phylogeny of the Cyphomandra clade of the genus Solanum (Solanaceae) based on ITS sequence data. Taxon 56:1012-1026.
13. Bonierbale, M., R. Plaisted, and S. Tanksley 1988. RFLP maps based on a common set of clones reveal modes of chromosomal evolution in potato and tomato. Genetics 120:1095-1103.
14. Bowers, J. E., B. A. Chapman, J. Rong, and A. H. Paterson 2003. Unravelling angiosperm genome evolution by phylogenetic analysis of chromosomal duplication events. Nature 422:433-438.
15. Brewbaker, J. L. 1953. Oppositional allelism in diploid and autotetraploid Trifolium hybridum l. Genetics 38:444-455.
16. Brewbaker, J. L. 1954. Incompatibility in an autotetraploid Trifolium repens. I. Competition and self-compatibility. Genetics 39:307-316.
17. Brewbaker, J. L. 1958. Self-compatibility in tetraploid strains of Trifolium hybridum. Hereditas 44:547-553.
18. Brewbaker, J. L. 1959. Biology of the angiosperm pollen grain. Indian J. Genet. Plant Breeding 19:121-133.
19. Brunet, J., and A. Liston 2001. Technical comment on polyploidy and gender dimorphism. Science 291:1441-1442.
20. Bull, J. J., and E. L. Charnov 1985. On irreversible evolution. Evolution 39:1149-1155.
21. Byrne, K. P., and G. Blanc 2006. Computational analyses of ancient polyploidy. Curr. Bioinform. 1:131-146.
22. Camadro, E., and S. J. Peloquin 1981. Cross-incompatibility between two sympatric polyploid Solanum species. Theor. Appl. Genet. 60:65-70.
23. Charlesworth, D. 1985. Distribution of dioecy and self-incompatibility in angiosperms. Pp. 237-268, in P. J. Greenwood, P. H. Harvey, and M. Slatkin, eds. Evolution: essays in honour of John Maynard Smith. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge .
24. Chawla, B., R. Bernatzky, W. Liang, and M. Marcotrigiano 1997. Breakdown of self-incompatibility in tetraploid Lycopersicon peruvianum: inheritance and expression of S-related proteins. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95:992-996.
25. Clarkson, J. J., S. Knapp, V. F. Garcia, R. G. Olmstead, A. R. Leitch, and M. W. Chase 2004. Phylogenetic relationships in Nicotiana (Solanaceae) inferred from multiple plastid DNA regions. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 33:75-90.
26. Correll, D. S. 1962. The potato and its wild relatives. Texas Research Foundation, Renner, Texas .
27. Crane, M. B., and D. Lewis 1942. Genetical studies in pears. III. Incompatibility and sterility. J. Genet. 43:31-42.
28. Darlington, C. D., and A. P. Wylie 1956. Chromosome atlas of flowering plants. G. Allen & Unwin, New York .
29. Dickinson, T. A., E. Lo, and N. Talent 2007. Polyploidy, reproductive biology, and Rosaceae: understanding evolution and making classifications. Plant Syst. Evol. 266:59-78.
30. Doganlar, S., A. Frary, C. M. Daunay, R. N. Lester, and S. D. Tanksley 2002. A comparative genetic linkage map of eggplant (Solanum melongena) and its implication to genome evolution in the Solanaceae. Genetics 161:1697-1711.
31. East, E., and A. Mangelsdorf 1925. A new interpretation of the heredity behaviour of self-sterile plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 11:166-171.
32. Entani, T., S. Takayama, M. Iwano, H. Shiba, F.-S. Che, and A. Isogai 1999. Relationship between polyploidy and pollen self-incompatibility phenotype in Petunia hybrida Vilm. Biosci. Biotechnol. Agrochem. 63:1882-1888.
33. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Ame. Nat. 125:1-15.
34. Gaiser, L. 1926. A list of chromosome numbers in angiosperms. Genetica 8:401-484.
35. Goldberg, E. E., and B. Igić 2008. On phylogenetic tests of irreversible evolution. Evolution 62:2727-2741.
36. Goldblatt, P. 1980. Polyploidy in angiosperms: monocotyledons. Plenum Press, New York .
37. Goldblatt, P., and D. E. Johnson 1979. Index to plant chromosome numbers (IPCN). Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis URL .
38. Golz, J. F., V. Su, A. E. Clarke, and E. Newbigin 1999. A molecular description of mutations affecting the pollen component of the Nicotiana alata S locus. Genetics 152:1123-1135.
39. Golz, J. F., H.-Y. Oh, V. Su, M. Kusaba, and E. Newbigin 2001. Genetic analysis of Nicotiana pollen-part mutants is consistent with the presence of the S-ribonuclease inhibitor at the S locus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:15372-15376.
40. Goodspeed, T. H. 1954. The genus Nicotiana, vol. 16. Chronica Botanica, An International Collection of Studies in the Method and History of Biology and Agriculture, Walthum, Mass .
41. Grafen, A. 1989. The phylogenetic regression. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 326:119-157.
42. Grant, C. 1956. The influence of breeding habit on the outcome of natural hybridization in plants. Am. Nat. 90:319-322.
43. Grant, V. 1963. The origin of adaptations. Columbia Univ. Press, New York .
44. Grant, V. 1971. Plant speciation. Columbia Univ. Press, New York and London .
45. Halverson, K., S. B. Heard, J. D. Nason, and J. O. S. III. 2008. Origins, distribution, and local co-occurence of polyploid cytotypes in Solidago altissima (Asteraceae). Am. J. Bot. 95:50-58.
46. Hauck, N. R., H. Yamane, R. Tao, and A. F. Iezzoni 2002. Self-compatibility and incompatibility in tetraploid sour cherry (Prunus cerasus L.). Sexual Plant Reproduction 15:39-46.
47. Hauck, N. R., H. Yamane, R. Tao, and A. F. Iezzoni 2006. Accumulation of nonfunctional S-haplotypes results in the breakdown of gametophytic self-incompatibility in tetraploid prunus. Genetics 172:1191-1198.
48. Hawkes, J. G., and J. P. Hjerting 1969. The Potatoes of Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, and Uruguay. A biosystematic study. Oxford Univ. Press, Great Britain .
49. Hermsen, J. G. T., and A. J. E. D. Boer 1971. The effect of colchicine treatment on Solanum acaule and S. bulbocastanum; a complete analysis of ploidy chimeras in S. bulbocastanum. Euphytica 20:171-180.
50. Hijmans, R. J., T. Gavrilenko, S. Stephenson, J. Bamberg, A. Salas, and D. M. Spooner 2007. Geographical and environmental range expansion through polyploidy in wild potatoes (Solanum section Petota). Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 16:485-495.
51. Hua, Z.-H., A. Fields, and T.-h. Kao 2008. Biochemical models for S-RNase-based self-incompatibility. Mol. Plant 1:575-585.
52. Huang, S.-X., H.-Q. Wu, Y.-R. Li, J. Wu, S.-J. Zhang, W. Heng, and S.-L. Zhang, 2008. Competitive interaction between two functional S-haplotypes confer self-compatibility on tetraploid Chines cherry (Prunus pseudocerasus Lindl. CV. Nanjing Chuisi). Plant Cell Reports 27:1075-1085.
53. Husband, B. C., B. Ozimec, S. L. Martin, and L. Pollock 2008. Mating consequences of polyploid evolution in flowering plants: Current trends and insights from synthetic polyploids. Int. J. Plant Sci. 169:195-206.
54. Igić, B., L. Bohs, and J. R. Kohn 2004. Historical inferences from the self-incompatibility locus. New Phytol. 161:97-105.
55. Igić, B., L. Bohs, and J. R. Kohn 2006. Ancient polymorphism reveals unidirectional breeding system shifts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103:1359-1363.
56. Igić, B., and J. R. Kohn 2001. Evolutionary relationships among self-incompatibility RNases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:13167-13171.
57. Igić, B., and J. R. Kohn 2006. The distribution of plant mating systems: Study bias against obligately outcrossing species. Evolution 60:1098-1103.
58. Igić, B., R. Lande, and J. R. Kohn 2008. Loss of self-incompatibility and its evolutionary consequences. Int J Plant Sci 169:93-104.
59. Ikeda, K., B. Igić, K. Ushijima, H. Yamane, N. R. Hauck, R. Nakano, H. Sassa, A. F. Iezzoni, J. R. Kohn, and R. Tao 2004. Primary structural features of the S haplotype-specific F-box protein, SFB in Prunus. Sexual Plant Reproduction 16:235-243.
60. Ioerger, T. R., A. G. Clark, and T.-H. Kao 1990. Polymorphism at the self-incompatibility locus in Solanaceae predates speciation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:9372-9735.
61. Kao, T. H., and T. Tsukamoto 2004. The molecular and genetic bases of S-RNase-based self-incompatibility. The Plant Cell 16:S72-S83.
62. Kass, R. E., and A. E. Raftery 1995. Bayes factors. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 90:773-795.
63. Kirch, H. H., H. Uhrig, F. Lottspeich, F. Salamini, and R. D. Thompson 1989. Characterization of proteins associated with self-incompatibility in Solanum tuberosum. Theor. Appl. Genet. 78:581-588.
64. Ku, H. M., T. Vision, J. Liu, and S. D. Tanksley 2000. Comparing sequenced segments of the tomato and Arabadopsis genomes: large-scale duplication followed by selective gene loss creates a network of synteny. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:9121-9126.
65. Kuroda, H., N. Takahashi, H. Shimada, M. Seki, K. Shinozaki, and M. Matsui, 2002. Classification and expression analysis of Arabidopsis F-box-containing protein genes. Plant Cell Physiol. 43:1073-85.
66. Levin, D. A. 1983. Polyploidy and the novelty of flowering plants. Am. Nat. 122:1-25.
67. Levin, R. A., and J. S. Miller 2005. Relationships within tribe Lycieae (Solanaceae): Paraphyly of Lycium and multiple origins of gender dimorphism. Am. J. Bot. 92:2044-2053.
68. Levin, R. A., N. R. Myers, and L. Bohs 2006. Phylogenetic relationships among the "spiny solanums" (Solanum subgenus Leptostemonum, Solanaceae). Am. J. Bot. 93:157-169.
69. Lewis, D. 1943. Physiology of incompatibility on plants. III. Autopolyploids. J. Genet. 45:171-185.
70. Lewis, D. 1947. Competition and dominance of incompatibility alleles in diploid pollen. Heredity 1:85-108.
71. Lewis, D. 1979. Sexual Incompatibility in Plants, The Institute of Biology's Studies in Biology, vol. 110. Edward Arnold Limited.
72. Lewis, W. H., and Y. Suda 1976. Diploids and polyploids from a single species population: temporal adaptations. J. Heredity 67:391-393.
73. Lin, C., L. A. Mueller, J. McCarthy, D. Crouzillat, and V. Petiard 2005. Coffee and tomato share common gene repertoires as revealed by deep squencing of seed and cherry transcripts. Theor. Appl. Genet. 112:114-130.
74. Livermore, J., and F. E. Johnstone 1940. The effect of chromosome doubling on the crossability of Solanum chacoense, Solanum jamesii and S. bulbocastanum with S. tuberosum. Am. Potato J. 17:170-173.
75. Livingstone, K., V. Lackney, J. Blauth, R. van Wijk, and M. Jahn 1999. Genome mapping in Capsicum and the evolution of genome structure in the Solanaceae. Genetics 152:1183-1202.
76. Lloyd, D. G. 1965. Evolution of self-compatibility and racial differentiation in Leavenworthia (Cruciferae). Contributions from the Gray Herbarium of Harvard University 195:3-134.
77. Lynch, M., and J. S. Conery 2000. The evolutionary fate and consequence of duplicate genes. Science 290:1151-1155.
78. Lynch, M., and J. S. Conery 2003. The evolutionary demography of duplicate genes. J. Struct. Funct. Genom. 3:35-44.
79. Mable, B. K. 2004. Polyploidy and self-compatibility: is there an association? New Phytologist 162:803-811.
80. Mace, E. S., C. G. Gebhardt, and R. N. Lester 1999. AFLP analysis of genetic relationships in the tribe Datureae (Solanaceae). Theor. Appl. Genetics Pp. 634-641.
81. Maddison, W. P. 2006. Confounding asymmetries in evolutionary diversification and character change. Evolution 60:1743-1746.
82. Maddison, W. P., P. E. Midford, and S. P. Otto 2007. Estimating a binary character's effect on speciation and extinction. Syst. Biol. 56:701-710.
83. Marks, G. E. 1965. Cytogenetic studies of tuberous Solanum species. III. Species relationships in some South and Central American species. New Phytol. 64:293-306.
84. Masterson, J. 1994. Stomatal size in fossil plants: evidence for polyploidy in majority of angiosperms. Science 264:421-424.
85. McClure, B. 2009. Darwin's foundation for investigating self-incompatibility and the progress toward a physiological model for S-RNase-based SI. J. Exp. Bot. 60:1069-1081.
86. Meyers, L. A., and D. A. Levin 2006. On the abundance of polyploids in flowering plants. Evolution 60:1198-1206.
87. Miller, J. S., R. A. Levin, and N. M. Feliciano 2008. A tale of two continents: Baker's rule and the maintenance of self-incompatibility in Lycium (Solanaceae). Evolution 62:1052-1065.
88. Miller, J. S., and D. L. Venable 2000. Polyploidy and the evolution of gender dimorphism in plants. Science 289:2335-2338.
89. Mione, T., R. C. Olmstead, R. K. Jansen, and G. J. Anderson 1994. Systematic implications of chloroplast DNA variation in Jaltomata and selected Physaloid genera (Solanaceae). Am. J. Bot. Pp. 912-918.
90. Montero-Castro, J. C., A. Delgado-Salinas, E. D. Luna, and L. E. Eguiarte, 2006. Phylogenetic analysis of Cestrum section Habrothamnus (Solanaceae) based on plastid and nuclear DNA sequences. Syst. Bot. 31:843-850.
91. de Nettancourt, D. 1977. Incompatibility in angiosperms. Springer-Verlag, Berlin .
92. de Nettancourt, D., U. Laneri, E. Capaccio, M. Westerhof, and R. Ecochard, 1974. Polyploidy and induced mutations in plant breeding, chap. Self-compatibility in a spontaneous tetraploid of Lycopersicon peruvianum Mill., Pp. 74-84. I.A.E.A., Vienna .
93. Newbigin, E., T. Paape, and J. R. Kohn 2008. RNase-based self-incompatibility: puzzled by pollen S. Plant Cell 20:2286-2292.
94. Nunes, M. D. S., R. A. M. Santos, S. M. Ferreira, J. Vieira, and C. P. Vieira, 2006. Variability patterns and positively selected sites at the gametophytic self-incompatibility pollen SFB gene in a wild self-incompatible Prunus spinosa (Rosaceae) population. New Phytol. 172:577-587.
95. Olmstead, R. G., and L. Bohs 2007. A summary of molecular systematic research in Solanaceae: 1982-2006. Acta Horticulturae 745:255-268.
96. Olmstead, R. G., L. Bohs, H. A. Migid, E. Santiago-Valentin, V. F. Garcia, and S. M. Collier 2008. A molecular phylogeny of the Solanaceae. Taxon Pp. 1159-1181.
97. Olmstead, R. G., and J. D. Palmer 1992. A chloroplast DNA phylogeny of the Solanaceae: subfamilial relationships and character evolution. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 79:346-360.
98. Olmstead, R. G., and J. A. Sweere 1994. Combining data in phylogenetic systematics: an empirical approach using three molecular data sets in the Solanaceae. Syst. Biol. 43:467-481.
99. Olmstead, R. G., J. A. Sweere, R. E. Spangler, L. Bohs, and J. D. Palmer 1999. Phylogeny and provisional classification of the Solanaceae DNA. Pp. 111-137, in M. Nee, D. E. Symon, R. N. Lester, and J. P. Jesop, eds. Solanaceae. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew .
100. Otto, S. P., and J. Whitton 2000. Polyploid incidence and evolution. Annu. Rev. Genet. 34:401-437.
101. Paape, T., B. Igic, S. D. Smith, R. Olmstead, L. Bohs, and J. R. Kohn 2008. A 15-million-year-old genetic bottleneck. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25:655-663.
102. Pagel, M. 1994. Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: a general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 255:37-45.
103. Pagel, M. 1999. The maximum likelihood approach to reconstructing ancestral character states of discrete characters on phylogenies. Syst. Biol. 48:612-622.
104. Pagel, M., and A. Meade 2006. Bayesian analysis of correlated evolution of discrete characters by reversible-jump Markov chain Monte Carlo. Am. Nat. 6:808-825.
105. Pandey, K. K. 1968. Colchicine induced changes in the self-incompatibility behavior of Nicotiana. Genetica 39:257-271.
106. Paterson, A. H., J. E. Bowers, M. D. Burow, X. Draye, C. G. Elsik, C. X. Jiang, C. S. Katsar, T. H. Lan, Y. R. Lin, R. Ming, and R. J. Wright 2000. Comparative genomics of plant chromosomes. Plant Cell 12:1523-1540.
107. Penas, M. L. L., F. E. Chiarini, G. Bernadello, and C. B. de Rojas 2006. Karyotypes of some species of Cestrum, Sessea, and Vestia (tribe Cestreae, Solanaceae). Caryologia 59:131-137.
108. Peralta, I. E., and D. M. Spooner 2001. Granule-bound starch synthase (GBSSI) gene phylogeny of wild tomatoes (Solanum l. section Lycopersicon[Mill.] Wettst. subsection Lycopersicon). Am. J. Bot. 88:1888-1902.
109. Perez, F., M. T. K. Arroyo, R. Medel, and M. A. Hershkovitz 2006. Ancestral reconstruction of flower morphology and pollination systems in Schizanthus (Solanaceae). Am. J. Bot. 93:1029-1038.
110. Prohens, J., G. J. Anderson, J. M. Blanca, J. Canizares, E. Zuriaga, and F. Nuez 2006. The implications of AFLP data for the systematics of the wild species of Solanum section Basarthrum. Syst. Bot. 31:208-216.
111. Pruski, K. 2007. Tissue culture propogation of Mongolian cherry (Prunus fruticosa L.) and Nanking cherry (Prunus tomentosa L.). Pp. 391-407, in S. J. Jain and H. Haggman, eds. Protocols for Micropropogation of Woody Trees and Fruits. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands .
112. Raftery, A. E. 1996. Hypothesis testing and model selection. Pp. 163-188, in W. R. Gilks, S. Richardson, and D. J. Spiegelhalter, eds. Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice. Chapman & Hall, London .
113. Ramsey, J., and D. W. Schemske 1998. Pathways, mechanisms, and rates of polyploid formation in flowering plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 29:467-501.
114. Ramsey, J., and D. W. Schemske 2002. Neopolyploidy in flowering plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33:589-639.
115. Rick, C. M. 1986. Reproductive isolation in the Lycopersicon peruvianum complex. Pp. 477-495, in W. G. D'Arcy, ed. Solanaceae, biology and systematics. Columbia Univ. Press, New York, New York, USA .
116. Rick, C. M., and S. D. Tanksley 1981. Genetic variation in Solanum pennellii: comparisons with two other sympatric tomato species. Plant Syst. Evol. 139:11-45.
117. Schlueter, J. A., P. Dixon, C. Granger, D. Grant, L. Clark, J. J. Doyle, and R. C. Schoenmaker 2004. Mining EST databases to resolve evolutionary events in major crop species. Genome 47:868-876.
118. Simillion, C., K. Vandepoele, M. C. E. V. Montagu, M. Zabeau, and Y. V. de Peer 2002. The hidden duplication past of Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:13627-13632.
119. Smith, S. A., J. M. Beaulieu, and M. J. Donoghue 2009. Mega-phylogeny approach for comparative biology: An alternative to supertree and supermatrix approaches. BMC Evol. Biol. 9:37-49.
120. Smith, S. D., and D. A. Baum 2006. Phylogenetics of the florally diverse Andean clade Iochrominae (Solanaceae). Am. J. Bot. 93:1140-1153.
121. Soltis, D. E., V. A. Albert, J. Leebens-Mack, C. D. Bell, A. H. Paterson, C. Zheng, D. Sankoff, C. W. DePamphilis, P. K. Wall, and P. S. Solits 2009. Polyploidy and angiosperm diversification. Am. J. Bot. 96:336-348.
122. Sonneveld, T., K. R. Tobutt, S. P. Vaughan, and T. P. Robbins 2005. Loss of pollen-S function in two self-compatible selections of Prunus avium is associated with deletion/mutation of an S haplotype-specific F-Box gene. The Plant Cell 17:37-51.
123. Spooner, D. M., G. J. Anderson, and R. K. Jansen 1993. Chloroplast DNA evidence for the interrelationships of tomatoes, potatoes, and pepinos (Solanaceae). Am. J. Bot. 80:676-688.
124. Spooner, D. M., D. S. Douches, and A. C. M. 1992. Allozyme variation within Solanum sect. Petota, ser. Etuberosa (Solanaceae). Am. J. Bot. 79:467-471.
125. Stebbins, G. L. 1938. Cytological characteristics associated with the different growth habits in the dicotyledons. Am. J. Bot. 25:189-198.
126. Stebbins, G. L. 1950. Variation and Evolution in Plants. Columbia Univ. Press, New York .
127. Stebbins, G. L. 1957. Self-fertilization and population variability in the higher plants. Am. Nat. 91.
128. Stebbins, G. L. 1971. Chromosomal Evolution in Higher Plants. Addison-Wesley, London, UK .
129. Stebbins, G. L. 1974. Flowering plants: evolution above the species level. Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Mass .
130. Stebbins, G. L. 1980. Polyploidy in plants: unsolved problems and prospects. Pp. 495-520, in W. H. Lewis, ed. Polyploidy: Biological Relevance. Plenum, New York .
131. Stone, J. L. 2002. Molecular mechanisms underlying the breakdown of gametophytic self-incompatibility. Q. Rev. Biol. 77:17-30.
132. Stout, A. B., and C. Chandler 1942. Hereditary transmission of induced tetraploidy and compatibility in fertilization. Science 96:257-258.
133. Tu, T.-Y., H. Sun, Z.-J. Gu, and J.-P. Yue 2005. Cytological studies on the Sino-Himalayan endemic Anisodus and four related genera from the tribe Hyoscyameae (Solanaceae) and their systematic and evolutionary implications. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 147:457-468.
134. Vieira, J., R. Santos, S. Ferreira, and C. Vieira 2008. Inferences on the number and frequency of S-pollen gene (SFB) specificities in the polyploid Prunus spinosa. Heredity 101:351-358.
135. Vision, T. J., D. G. Brown, and S. D. Tanksley 2000. The origins of genomic duplications in Arabidopsis. Science 290:2114-2117.
136. Walsh, B. M., and S. B. Hoot 2001. Phylogenetic relationships of Capsicum (Solanaceae) using DNA. Int. J. Plant Sci. 162:1409-1418.
137. Weese, T. L., and L. Bohs 2007. A three-gene phylogeny of the genus Solanum (Solanaceae). Syst. Bot. 32:445-463.
138. Welsh, K. J., and K. C. Sink 1981. Morphogenetic responses of Browallia leaf sections and callus. Ann. Bot. 48:583-590.
139. Wendel, J. F. 2000. Genome evolution in polyploids. Plant Mol. Biol. 42:225-249.
140. Whitson, M., and P. S. Manos 2005. Untangling Physalis (Solanaceae) from the Physaloids: A two-gene phylogeny of the Physalinae. Syst. Bot. 30:216-230.
141. Wikstrom, N., V. Savolainen, and M. W. Chase 2001. Evolution of the angiosperms: calibrating the family tree. Proc. Biol. Sci. 268:2211-2220.
142. Wolfe, K. H. 2001. Yesterday's polyploids and the mystery of diploidization. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2:333-341.
143. Wu, F., L. A. Mueller, D. Crouzillat, V. Petiard, and S. D. Tanksley 2006. Combining bioinformatics and phylogenetics to identify large sets of single-copy orthologous genes (COSII) for comparative, evolutionary and systematic studies: A test case in the euasterid plant clade. Genetics 174:1407-1420.
144. 2 test. J. R. Statis. Soc. 1:217-235.
145. Yeung, K., J. S. Miller, A. E. Savage, B. C. Husband, B. Igic, and J. R. Kohn, 2005. Association of ploidy and sexual system in L. californicum (Solanaceae). Evolution 59:2048-2055.