Differential dynamics of spatial and non-spatial stimulus-response compatibility effects: A dual task LRP study

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 136, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 42-51

  Lehle, Carola ^a   Cohen, Asher ^b   Sangals, Jörg ^a   Sommer, Werner ^a   Stürmer, Birgit ^a  

^a HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

2300 Human Experimental Psychology; 2323 Visual Perception; 2330 Motor Processes; 2340 Cognitive Processes; 2346 Attention; Cognitive control; Conflict; Dual task performance; Electroencephalography; Simon effect

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

ADULT; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 78650809428     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.09.013     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Ansorge U., Wühr P. A response-discrimination account of the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2004, 30:365-377.
2. Coles M.G.H. Modern mind-brain reading: Psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1989, 26:251-269.
3. Craft J.L., Simon J.R. Processing symbolic information from a visual display: Interference from an irrelevant directional cue. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1970, 83(3):415-420.
4. Daubenspeck J.A., Lim L.M., Akay M. Global field power helps separate respiratory-related evoked potentials from EMG. Journal of Applied Physiology 2000, 88:282-290.
5. De Jong R., Liang C.C., Lauber E. Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1994, 20:731-750.
6. De Jong R., Wierda M., Mulder G., Mulder L.J.M. Use of partial stimulus information in response procession. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1988, 14:682-692.
7. Fitts P.M., Seeger C. S-R compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1953, 46:199-210.
8. Gratton G., Coles M.G.H., Sirevaag E.J., Eriksen C.W., Donchin E. Pre- and poststimulus activation of response channels: A psychophysiological analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1988, 14:331-344.
9. Hommel B. Inverting the Simon effect by intention. Determinants direction extent effects irrelevant spatial information. Psychological Research 1993, 55:270-279.
10. Hommel B. Interactions between stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response compatibility. Psychological Research 1997, 59:248-260.
11. Hommel B. Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24(5):1368-1384.
12. Hübner R., Lehle C. Strategies of flanker coprocessing in single and dual tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33(1):103-123.
13. Kornblum S., Hasbroucq T., Osman A. Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility - a model and taxonomy. Psychological Review 1990, 97(2):253-270.
14. Lehle C., Hübner R. Strategic capacity sharing between two tasks: Evidence from tasks with the same and with different task sets. Psychological Research 2009, 73(5):707-726.
15. Lehmann D., Skrandies W. Reference-free identification of components of checkerboard-evoked multichannel potential fields. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1980, 48(6):609-621.
16. Lien M.C., Proctor R.W. Multiple spatial correspondence effects on dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2000, 26(4):1260-1280.
17. Lu C.H., Proctor R.W. The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1995, 2:174-207.
18. Magen H., Cohen A. Action-based and vision-based selection of input: Two sources of control. Psychological Research 2002, 66:247-259.
19. Magen H., Cohen A. Location specifity in response selection processes for visual stimuli. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2005, 12(3):541-548.
20. Masaki H., Wild-Wall N., Sangals J., Sommer W. The functional locus of the lateralized readiness potential. Psychophysiology 2004, 41:220-230.
21. McCann R.S., Johnston J.C. Locus of the single-channel bottleneck in dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1992, 18:471-484.
22. Melara R.D., Wang H., Vu K.P.L., Proctor R.W. Attentional origins of the Simon Effect: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Brain Research 2008, 1215:147-159.
23. Miller J., Alderton M. Backward response-level crosstalk in the psychological refractory period paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32(1):149-165.
24. Miller J., Hackley S.A. Electrophysiological evidence for temporal overlap among contingent mental processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1992, 121:195-209.
25. Miller J., Patterson T., Ulrich R. Jackknife-based method for measuring LRP onset latency difference. Psychophysiology 1998, 35:99-155.
26. Milner A.D., Goodale M.A. The visual brain in action 1995, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
27. Mishkin M., Ungerleider L.G., Macko K.A. Object vision and spatial vision: Two cortical pathways. Trends in Neurosciences 1983, 6(10):414-417.
28. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9(1):97-113.
29. Osman A., Moore C.M. The locus of dual-task interference: Psychological refractory effects in movement-related brain potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1993, 19:1292-1312.
30. Pashler H. Shifting visual attention and selecting motor responses: Distinct attentional mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1991, 17(4):1023-1040.
31. Pashler H., Johnston J.C. Chronometric evidence for central postponement in temporally overlapping tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 1989, 41(1-A):19-45.
32. Riehle A., Kornblum S., Requin J. Neuronal correlates of sensorimotor association in stimulus-response compatibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1997, 23(6):1708-1726.
33. Romaiguere P., Hasbroucq T., Possamai C.-A., Seal J. Intensity to force manipulation: A new effect of stimulus-response compatibility revealed by analysis of response time and electromyographic activity of a prime mover. Cognitive Brain Research 1993, 1:197-201.
34. Schubert T., Fischer R., Stelzel C. Response activation in overlapping tasks and the response-selection bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2008, 34(2):376-397.
35. Schweikert R. Critical-path scheduling of mental processes in dual task. Science 1980, 209:704-706.
36. Simon J.R. The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective 1990, 31-86. North-Holland, Oxford. R.W. Proctor, T.G. Reeve (Eds.).
37. Snyder L.H., Batista A.P., Andersen R.A. Intention-related activity in the posterior parietal cortex: A review. Vision Research 2000, 40:1433-1441.
38. Stürmer B., Leuthold H., Soetens E., Schröter H., Sommer W. Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2002, 28:1345-1363.
39. Valle-Inclan F. The locus of interference in the Simon effect: An ERP study. Biological Psychology 1996, 43:147-162.
40. Valle-Inclan F., Redondo M. On the automaticity of ipsilateral response activation in the Simon effect. Psychophysiology 1998, 35:366-371.
41. Wascher E., Schatz U., Kuder T., Verleger R. Validity and boundary conditions of automatic response activation in the Simon task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2001, 27(3):731-751.
42. Watter S., Logan G.D. Parallel response selection in dual-task situations. Perception & Psychophysics 2006, 68(2):254-277.
43. Welford A.T. The 'psychological refractory period' and the timing of high-speed performance: a review and a theory. British Journal of Psychology 1952, 43:2-19.
44. Wühr P., Ansorge U. A Simon effect in memory retrieval: Evidence for the response-discrimination account. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2007, 14:984-988.
45. Wühr, P., & Biebl, R. (in press). The role of working memory in spatial s-r correspondence effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. http://doi:10.1037/a0020563.
46. Wühr P., Biebl R., Ansorge U. The impact of stimulus and response variability on S-R correspondence effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2008, 34:533-545.