A Simon effect in memory retrieval: Evidence for the response- discrimination account

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 984-988

  Wühr, Peter ^a   Ansorge, Ulrich ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^b BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 37349109333     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194132     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. ANSORGE, U., & WÜHR, P. (2004). A response-discrimination account of the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 30, 365-377.
2. COLES, M. G. (1989). Modern mind-brain reading: Psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition. Psychophysiology, 26, 251-269.
3. DE HOUWER, J. (2004). Spatial Simon effects with nonspatial responses. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 49-53.
4. DE HOUWER, J., BECKERS, T., VANDOORPE, S., & CUSTERS, R. (2005). Further evidence for the role of mode-independent short-term associations in spatial Simon effects. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 659-666.
5. EIMER, M., HOMMEL, B., & PRINZ, W. (1995). S-R compatibility and response selection. Acta Psychologica, 90, 301-313.
6. HOMMEL, B. (1993). Inverting the Simon effect by intention: Determinants of direction and extent of effects of irrelevant spatial information. Psychological Research, 55, 270-279.
7. HOMMEL, B. (1994). Spontaneous decay of response-code activation. Psychological Research, 56, 261-268.
8. HOMMEL, B. (1997). Toward an action-concept model of stimulus-response compatibility. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.), Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 281-320). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
9. HOMMEL, B. (2002). Responding to object files: Automatic integration of spatial information revealed by stimulus-response compatibility effects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 567-580.
10. HOMMEL, B., MÜSSELER, J., ASCHERSLEBEN, G., & PRINZ, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 24, 849-937.
11. KORNBLUM, S., HASBROUCQ, T., & OSMAN, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility. A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
12. LU, C. H., & PROCTOR, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 174-207.
13. SIMON, J. R., & RUDELL, A. P (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 300-304.
14. TLAUKA, M., & MCKENNA, F. P. (1998). Mental imagery yields stimulus-response compatibility. Acta Psychologica, 98, 67-79.
15. VALLE-INCLÁN, F., & REDONDO, M. (1998). On the automaticity of ipsilateral response activation in the Simon effect. Psychophysiology, 35, 366-371.
16. WÜHR, P. (2006). The Simon effect in vocal responses. Acta Psychologica, 90, 301-313.
17. WÜHR, P., & ANSORGE, U. (2005). Exploring trial-by-trial modulations of the Simon effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 705-731.
18. ZHANG, H., ZHANG, J., & KORNBLUM, S. (1999). A parallel distributed processing model of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response compatibility. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 386-432.