The locus of interference in the Simon effect: An ERP study

Biological Psychology

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 147-162

  Valle Inclan F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF A CORUÑA   (Spain)

Author keywords

ERP; Event related potentials; LRP; P300; S R compatibility; Simon effect

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; DICHOTIC LISTENING; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; REACTIVE INHIBITION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; BRAIN ASYMMETRY; ELECTRODE; EVOKED RESPONSE; EYE FIXATION; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DICHOTIC LISTENING TESTS; DOMINANCE, CEREBRAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; REACTIVE INHIBITION; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 0029939705     PISSN: 03010511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0301-0511(95)05181-3     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Coles, M.G.H. (1989). Modern mind-brain reading: psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition. Psychophysiology, 26, 251-269.
2. Coles, M.G.H., Gratton, G., & Donchin, E. (1988). Detecting early communication: using measures of movement-related potentials to illuminate human information processing. Biological Psychology, 26, 69-89.
3. Craft, J.L., & Simon, J.R. (1970). Processing symbolic information from a visual display: interference from an irrelevant directional cue. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 415-420.
4. De Jong, R., Liang, C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731-750.
5. De Jong, R., Wierda, M., Mulder, G., & Mulder, L.J.M. (1988). The use of partial information in response preparation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 682-692.
6. Donchin, E., & Coles, M.G.H. (1988). Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 355-372.
7. Gunther, T.C., Wijers, A.A., Jackson, J.L., & Mulder, G. (1994). Visual spatial attention to stimuli presented on the vertical and horizontal meridian: an ERP study. Psychophysiology, 31, 140-153.
8. Hasbroucq, T., & Guiard, Y. (1991). Stimulus-response compatibility and the Simon effect: toward a conceptual clarification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 246-266.
9. Hedge, A., & Marsh, N.W.A. (1975). The effects of irrelevant spatial correspondences on two-choice response-time. Acta Psychologica, 39, 427-439.
10. Hommel, B. (1994). Spontaneous decay of response-code activation. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 56, 261-268.
11. Hommel, B. (1995). Stimulus-response compatibility and the Simon effect: toward an empirical clarification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 764-775.
12. Jeffreys, D.A., & Axford, J.G. (1972a). Source locations of pattern-specific components of human visual evoked potentials. I. Components of striate cortical origin. Experimental Brain Research, 16, 1-21.
13. Jeffreys, D.A., & Axford, J.G. (1972b). Source locations of pattern-specific components of human visual evoked potentials. II. Components of extrastriate cortical origin. Experimental Brain Research, 16, 22-40.
14. Kornblum, S. (1992). Dimensional overlap and dimensional relevance in stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus compatibility. In G.E. Stelmach, & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior II (pp. 743-774). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
15. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility. A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
16. Kornblum, S., & Lee, J. (1995). Stimulus-response compatibility with relevant and irrelevant stimulus dimensions that do and do not overlap with the response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 855-875.
17. Lu, C.H., & Proctor, R.W. (1994). Processing of an irrelevant location dimension as a function of the relevant stimulus dimension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 286-298.
18. Luck, S.J., & Hillyard, S.A. (1994). Spatial filtering during visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1000-1014.
19. Magliero, A., Bashore, T.R., Coles, M.G.H., & Donchin, E. (1984). On the dependence of P300 latency on stimulus evaluation processes. Psychophysiology, 21, 171-186.
20. McCarthy, G., & Donchin, E. (1981). A metric for thought: a comparison of P300 latency and reaction time. Science, 211, 77-80.
21. O'Leary, M.J., & Barber, P.J. (1993). Interference effects in the Stroop and Simon paradigms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 830-844.
22. Osman, A., Bashore, T.R., Coles, M.G.H., Donchin, E., & Meyer, D. E. (1992). On the transmission of partial information: inferences from movement-related brain potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 217-232.
23. Ragot, R. (1984). Perceptual and motor space representation: An event related potential study. Psychophysiology, 21, 159-170.
24. Ragot, R. (1990). Cerebral evoked potentials: early indexes of compatibility effects. In R.W. Proctor, & T.G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: an integrated perspective (pp. 225-239). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
25. Ragot, R., & Fiori, N. (1994). Mental processing during reactions toward and away from stimulus: an ERP study of auditory congruence and S-R compatibility. Psychophysiology, 31, 439-446.
26. Ragot, R., & Renault, B. (1981). P300 as a function of S-R compatibility and motor programming. Biological Psychology, 13, 289-294.
27. Ragot, R., Renault, B., & Rémond, A. (1980). Hemispheric involvement during a bimanual RT task: P300 and motor potential. In H.H. Kornhuber, & L. Deecke (Eds.), Motivation, motor and sensory processes of the brain: electrical potentials, behaviour and clinical use (pp. 736-741). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
28. Renault, B., Fiori, N., & Giami, S. (1989). Latencies of event related potentials as a tool for studying motor processing organization. In B. Renault, M. Kutas, M.G.H. Coles, & A.W.K. Gaillard (Eds.), Event related potentials investigations of cognition (pp. 217-230). Amsterdam: North Holland.
29. Ritter, W., Simson, R., & Vaughan, H.G. (1983). Event-related potential correlates of two stages of information processing in physical and semantic discrimination tasks. Psychophysiology, 20, 168-179.
30. Rugg, M.D., Lines, C.R., & Milner, D. (1984). Visual evoked potentials to lateralized visual stimuli and the measurement of interhemispheric transmission time. Neuropsychologia, 22, 215-225.
31. Schneider, W. (1990). MEL user's guide: computer techniques for real time experimentation. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools.
32. Simon, J.R. (1990). The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. In R.W. Proctor, & T.G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: an integrated perspective, (pp. 31-88). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
33. Simon, J.R., & Acosta, E., Jr. (1982). Effect of irrelevant information on the processing of relevant information. Perception & Psychophysics, 31, 383-388.
34. Simon, J.R., Acosta, E., Jr., Mewaldt, S.P., & Speidel, C.R. (1976). The effect of an irrelevant directional cue choice reactions time: duration of the phenomenon and its relation to stages of processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 19, 16-22.
35. Simon, J.R., & Craft, J.L. (1970). Effects of an irrelevant auditory stimulus on visual choice reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 86, 272-274.
36. Simon, J.R., & Rudell, A.P. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 300-304.
37. Smid, H.G.O.M., Mulder, G., & Mulder, L.J.M. (1987). The continuous flow model revisited: perceptual and motor aspects. In R. Johnson, Jr., J.W. Rohrbaugh, & R. Parasuraman (Eds.), Current trends in event-related potential research: electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology (Supp., 40, pp. 270-278). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
38. Smid, H.G.O.M., Mulder, G., & Mulder, L.J.M. (1990). Selective response activation can begin before stimulus recognition is complete: a psychophysiological and error analysis of continuous flow. Acta Psychologica, 74, 169-201.
39. Smulders, F. (1993). The selectivity of age effects on information processing. Doctoral dissertation. University of Amsterdam.
40. Sommer, W., Leuthold, H., & Hermanutz, M. (1993). Covert effects of alcohol revealed by event-related potentials. Perception and Psychophysics, 54, 127-135.
41. Stoffels, E.J., van der Molen, M.W., & Keuss, P.J.G. (1989). An additive factors analysis of the effect(s) of location cues associated with auditory stimulation on stages of information processing. Acta Psychologica, 70, 161-197.
42. Valle-Inclán, F., Lamas, J., Mahía, J., & Espinosa, P. (1993). ERP evidence for parallel perceptual and motor processing of spatial location (abstract). Psychophysiology, 30 (Suppl. 1), S66.
43. Valle-Inclán, F., Redondo, M., Lamas, J., & Rumbo, T. (1995). Loci of interference in the Simon effect and its reversal studied with ERPs (abstract). Psychophysiology, 32 (Suppl. 1), S79.
44. Wijers, A.A., Mulder, G., Okita, T., & Mulder, L.J.M. (1989). Event-related potentials during memory search and selective attention to letter size and conjunctions of letter size and colour. Psychophysiology, 26, 529-547.