More on lexical bias: How efficient can a "lexical editor" be?

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 60, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 291-307

  Nozari, Nazbanou ^a   Dell, Gary S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Feedback; Lexical bias; Self monitoring; Speech errors

Indexed keywords

EID: 60349083570     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2008.09.006     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Baars B.J., Motley M.T., and MacKay D.G. Output editing for lexical status in artificially elicited slips of the tongue. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 14 (1975) 382-391
2. Berg, T. (1983). Monitoring via feedback in language production: Evidence from cut-offs. Unpublished manuscript.
3. Blackmer E.R., and Mitton J.L. Theories of monitoring and the timing of repairs in spontaneous speech. Cognition 39 (1991) 173-194
4. Bock J.K. Toward a cognitive psychology of syntax: Information processing contributions to sentence formulation. Psychological Review 89 (1982) l-47
5. Bock J.K. Language production: Methods and methodologies. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 3 (1996) 395-421
6. Del Viso S., Igoa J.M., and García-Albea J.E. Autonomy of phonological encoding: Evidence from slips of the tongue in Spanish. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 20 (1991) 161-185
7. Dell G.S. Representation of serial order in speech: Evidence from the repeated phoneme eVect in speech errors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 10 (1984) 222-233
8. Dell G.S. A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review 93 (1986) 283-321
9. Dell G.S. The retrieval of phonological forms in production: Test of predictions from a connectionist model. Journal of Memory and Language 27 (1988) 124-142
10. Dell G.S. Effects of frequency and vocabulary type on phonological speech errors. Language and Cognitive Processes 5 (1990) 313-349
11. Dell G.S., Martin N., and Schwartz M.F. A case-series test of the interactive two-step model of lexical access: Predicting word repetition from picture naming. Journal of Memory and Language 56 (2007) 490-520
12. Dell G.S., and Reich P.A. Stages in sentence production: An analysis of speech error data. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 20 (1981) 611-629
13. Ferreira V., and Pashler H. Central bottleneck inXuences on the processing stages of word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 28 (2002) 1187-1199
14. Foss D., and Swinney D. On the psychological reality of the phoneme: Perception, identification, and consciousness. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 12 (1973) 246-257
15. Garrett M.F. The analysis of sentence production. In: Bower G.H. (Ed). The psychology of learning and motivation Vol. 9 (1975), Academic Press, New York
16. Gordon J.K., and Baum S.R. Rhyme priming in aphasia: The role of phonology in lexical access. Brain and Language 47 (1994) 661-683
17. Harley T.A. A critique of top-down independent levels models of speech production: Evidence from non-plan-internal speech errors. Cognitive Science 8 (1984) 191-219
18. Hartsuiker R.J. Are speech error patterns affected by a monitoring bias?. Language and Cognitive Processes 21 (2006) 856-891
19. Hartsuiker R.J., Anton-Mendez I., Roelstraete B., and Costa A. Spoonish Spanerisms: A lexical bias effect in Spanish. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 32 (2006) 949-953
20. Hartsuiker R.J., Corley M., and Martensen H. The lexical bias effect is modulated by context, but the standard monitoring account doesn't fly: Related reply to Baars, Motley, and MacKay (1975). Journal of Memory and Language 52 (2005) 58-70
21. Hartsuiker R.J., and Kolk H.H.J. A computational test of the perceptual loop theory. Cognitive Psychology 24 (2001) 113-157
22. Humphreys, K. R. (2002). Lexical bias in speech errors. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
23. Laver J.D.M. Monitoring systems in the neurolinguistic control of speech production. In: Fromkin V.A. (Ed). Errors in linguistic performance (1980), Academic Press, New York
24. Levelt W.J.M. Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition 14 (1983) 41-104
25. Levelt W.J.M. Speaking: From intention to articulation (1989), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
26. Levelt W.J.M., Roelofs A., and Meyer A.S. A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1999) 1-75
27. Logan G.D., and Cowan W.B. On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A theory of an act of control. Psychological Review 91 (1984) 295-327
28. MacKay D.G. Problems with Popper: The initial goal is to develop viable theories, not disconfirm them. Consciousness and Cognition 1 (1992) 231-240
29. Martin N., Gagnon D.A., Schwartz M.F., Dell G.S., and Saffran E.M. Phonological facilitation of semantic errors in normal and aphasic speakers. Language and Cognitive Processes 11 (1996) 257-282
30. Meyer A.S. The time course of phonological encoding in language production: Phonological encoding inside a syllable. Journal of Memory and Language 30 (1991) 69-89
31. Motley M.T., and Baars B.J. Semantic bias effects on the outcomes of verbal slips. Cognition 4 (1976) 177-187
32. Motley M.T., Camden C.T., and Baars B.J. Covert formulation and editing of anomalies in speech production: Evidence from experimentally elicited slips of the tongue. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 21 (1982) 578-594
33. Nooteboom, S. G. (2004). Self-monitoring of inner speech and overt speech. In: J. Slifka, S. Manuel, & M. Matthies (Eds.), From sound to sense: 50+ years of discoveries in speech communication. Proceedings of a symposium held at MIT, 11/06/2004-13/06/2006 (pp. C-187-C-190). URL: http://www.rle.mit.edu/soundtosense/.
34. Nooteboom S.G. Listening to oneself: Monitoring speech production. In: Hartsuiker R.J., Bastiaanse R., Postma A., and Wijnen F. (Eds). Phonological encoding and monitoring in normal and pathological speech (2005), Psychology Press, Hove, England 167-186
35. Nooteboom S.G., and Quené H. Self-monitoring and feedback: A new attempt to find the main cause of lexical bias in phonological speech errors. Journal of Memory and Language 58 (2008) 837-861
36. Oppenheim G.M., and Dell G.S. Inner speech slips exhibit lexical bias, but not the phonemic similarity effect. Cognition 106 (2008) 528-537
37. Postma A. Detection of errors during speech production: A review of speech monitoring models. Cognition 77 (2000) 97-131
38. Postma A., and Kolk H.H.J. Speech errors, disfluencies, and self-repairs in stutterers in two accuracy conditions. Journal of Fluency Disorders 15 (1990) 291-303
39. Postma A., and Kolk H.H.J. The effects of noise masking and required accuracy on speech errors, disfluencies, and selfrepairs. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 35 (1992) 537-544
40. Postma A., and Kolk H.H.J. The covert repair hypothesis: Prearticulatory repair processes in normal and stuttered disfluencies. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 36 (1993) 472-487
41. Postma A., Kolk H.H.J., and Povel D.J. On the relation among speech errors, disfluencies, and self-repairs. Language and Speech 33 (1990) 19-29
42. Ratcliff R. A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review 85 (1978) 59-108
43. Ratcliff R., Gomez P., and McKoon G. A diffusion model account of the lexical decision task. Psychological Review 111 (2004) 159-182
44. Roelofs A. Error biases in spoken word planning and monitoring by aphasic and nonaphasic speakers: Comment on Rapp and Goldrick (2000). Psychological Review 111 (2004) 561-572
45. Shattuck-Hufnagel S. The role of word onset consonants in speech production planning: New evidence from speech error patterns. In: Keller E., and Gopnik M. (Eds). Motor and sensory processes of language (1987), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 17-51
46. Slevc L.R., and Ferreira V.S. Halting in single word production: A test of the perceptual loop theory of speech monitoring. Journal of Memory and Language 54 (2006) 515-540
47. Stemberger, J. P. (1984). Lexical bias in errors in language production: Interactive components, editors, and perceptual biases. Unpublished manuscript, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh.
48. Wagenmakers E.J., Van Der Maas H.L.J., and Grasman R.P.P.P. An EZ-diffusion model for response time and accuracy. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 14 (2007) 3-22
49. Wheeldon L.R., and Levelt W.J.M. Monitoring the time course of phonological encoding. Journal of Memory and Language 34 (1995) 311-334