A model of procedural and distributive fairness

Theory and Decision

Volumn 70, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 111-128

  Krawczyk, Michal Wiktor ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Distributive justice; Intentions; Procedural justice; Ultimatum game

Indexed keywords

DECISION THEORY;

DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE; EUROPEAN COUNTRIES; INTENTIONS; PROCEDURAL JUSTICE; SEQUENTIAL BARGAINING GAME; SOCIAL MOBILITY; ULTIMATUM GAME;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS;

EID: 78650622386     PISSN: 00405833     EISSN: 15737187     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11238-009-9189-4     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. A. Alesina G. M. Angeletos 2005 Fairness and redistribution, U.S. versus Europe American Economics Review 95 4 960 980 10.1257/0002828054825655 (Pubitemid 43015655)
2. A. Alesina R. Di Tella R. MacCulloch 2004 Inequality and happiness: Are Europeans and Americans different? Journal of Public Economics 88 2009 2042 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2003.07.006 (Pubitemid 38548919)
3. L. Babcock G. Loewenstein 1997 Explaining bargaining impasse: The role of self-serving bias Journal of Economic Perspectives 11 1 109 126
4. Battigalli, P., & Dufwenberg, M. (2006). Dynamic psychological games. Econometrica (under revision).
5. S. Blount 1995 When social outcomes aren't fair: The effect of casual attributions on preferences Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 63 131 144 10.1006/obhd.1995.1068
6. G. E. Bolton J. Brandts A. Ockenfels 2005 Fair procedures: Evidence from games involving lotteries Economic Journal 115 506 1054 1076 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2005.01032.x (Pubitemid 41703131)
7. G. E. Bolton A. Ockenfels 2000 ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity and competition American Economic Review 90 1 166 193 10.1257/aer.90.1.166
8. G. E. Bolton A. Ockenfels 2006 Inequality aversion, efficiency, and maximin preferences in simple distribution experiments: Comment American Economic Review 96 5 1906 1911 10.1257/aer.96.5.1906
9. R. Bosman F. van Winden 2002 Emotional hazard in a power-to-take game Economic Journal 112 1 147 169 10.1111/1468-0297.0j677 (Pubitemid 34089067)
10. J. Brockner B. M. Wiesenfeld 1996 An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: Interactive effects of outcomes and procedures Psychological Bulletin 120 2 189 208 10.1037/0033-2909.120.2.189
11. G. Charness 2004 Attribution and reciprocity in an experimental labor market Journal of Labor Economics 22 3 665 688 10.1086/383111 (Pubitemid 39374765)
12. Charness, G., & Levine, D. I. (2005). Intention and stochastic outcomes: An experimental study, Working paper.
13. G. Charness M. Rabin 2002 Understanding social preferences with simple tests Quarterly journal of economics 117 3 817 869 10.1162/003355302760193904
14. J. C. Cox C. A. Deck 2005 On the nature of reciprocal motives Economic Inquiry 43 3 623 635 10.1093/ei/cbi043 (Pubitemid 41389556)
15. R. Cropanzano C.A. Prehar P.Y. Chen 2002 Using social exchange theory to distinguish procedural from interactional justice Group and Organization Management 27 324 351 10.1177/1059601102027003002 (Pubitemid 36668511)
16. M. Dufwenberg G. Kirchsteiger 2004 A theory of sequential reciprocity Games and Economic Behavior 47 268 298 10.1016/j.geb.2003.06.003 (Pubitemid 38516195)
17. Falk, A., Fehr, E., Fischbacher, U. (2000). Testing theories of fairness-intentions matter. Working Paper, University of Zurich.
18. E. Fehr S. Gächter 2000 Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity Journal of Economic Perspectives 14 3 159 181 10.1257/jep.14.3.159
19. E. Fehr K. Schmidt 1999 A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation Quarterly Journal of Economics 114 817 868 10.1162/003355399556151
20. Folger R. (1986) Rethinking equity theory: A referent cognitions model. In: Bierhoff H. W., Cohen R. L., Greenberg J. (eds) Justice in social relations. Plenum Press, New York, pp 145-162
21. Folger R. (1986) A referent cognitions theory of relative deprivation. In: Olson J. M., Herman C. P., Zanna M. P. (eds) Relative deprivation and social comparison. Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers, London
22. J. Geanakoplos J. D. Pearce E. Stachetti 1989 Psychological games and sequential rationality Games and Economic Behavior 1 60 79 10.1016/0899-8256(89) 90005-5
23. E. Hoffman M. L. Spitzer 1985 Entitlements, rights, and fairness: An experimental examination of subjects' concepts of distributive justice Journal of Legal Studies 14 2 259 297 10.1086/467773
24. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). The simulation heuristic. In Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (p. 201). Cambridge University Press.
25. E. Karni T. Salmon B. Sopher 2001 Individual sense of fairness: An experimental study Experimental Economics 11 2 174 189 10.1007/s10683-007-9165-1
26. Kramer, R. M., Shah, P. P., & Woerner, S. (1995). When ultimatums fail: Social identity and moralistic aggression in coercive bargaining. In R. M. Kramer, D. M. Messick (Eds.), Negotiation as a social process (285-308). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27. Y. Kroll L. Davidovitz 2003 Inequality aversion vs risk aversion Economica 70 19 29 10.1111/1468-0335.t01-1-00269 (Pubitemid 36209986)
28. P.J. Krehbiel R. Cropanzano 2000 Procedural justice, outcome favorability and emotion Social Justice Research 13 339 360 10.1023/A:1007670909889 (Pubitemid 33285032)
29. Lind E. A., Tyler T. R. (1988) The social psychology of procedural justice. Plenum Press, New York
30. G. F. Loewenstein E. U. Weber C. K. Hsee N. Welch 2001 Risk as feelings Psychological Bulletin 127 2 267 286 10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.267
31. M. Rabin 1993 Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics American Economic Review 83 5 1281 1302
32. Rawls J. (1971) Theory of justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
33. Reuben, E. & van Winden, F. (2005). Negative reciprocity and the interaction of emotions and fairness norms. Discussion Paper 05-014/1. Tinbergen Institute.
34. Sanfey, A. G., Rilling, J. K., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2003). The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game. Science 13, 300(5626) 1673-1675.
35. P. Schmitt 2004 On perceptions of fairness: The role of valuations, outside options, and information in ultimatum bargaining games Experimental Economics 7 49 73 10.1023/A:1026210021955 (Pubitemid 39072855)
36. Sebald, A. (2007). Procedural concerns in psychological games. ECORE Discussion Paper 2007/62, Brussels.
37. R. Selten A. Ockenfels 1998 An experimental solidarity game Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 34 517 539 10.1016/S0167-2681(97)00107-8
38. A. K. Sen 1979 Personal utilities and public judgement Economic Journal 89 537 558 10.2307/2231867
39. J. Sonnegard 1996 Determination of first movers in sequential bargaining games: An experimental study Journal of Economic Psychology 17 359 386 10.1016/0167-4870(96)00014-1 (Pubitemid 126169187)
40. H. R Strotz 1955 Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization Review of Economic Studies 23 3 165 180 10.2307/2295722
41. Thibaut J., Walker L. (1975) Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
42. J. Thibaut L. Walker 1978 A theory of procedure California Law Review 66 541 566 10.2307/3480099
43. Trautmann, S. (2006). A procedural extension of the Fehr-Schmidt model of inequality aversion, M.Phil Thesis, Tinbergen Institute.
44. H. M. Weiss K. Suckow R. Cropanzano 1999 Effects of justice conditions on discrete emotions Journal of Applied Psychology 84 786 794 10.1037/0021-9010. 84.5.786