Lineage-specific variation in intensity of natural selection in mammals

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 383-398

  Toll Riera, MacArena ^a,b   Laurie, Steve ^a   Albá, M Mar ^a,b,c  

^a INST MUNIC D INVESTIGACIO MEDICA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

^c INSTITUCIÓ CATALANA DE RECERCA I ESTUDIS AVANÇATS ICREA   (Spain)

Author keywords

evolutionary rate acceleration; mammals; natural selection; positive selection

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COW; DOG; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HUMAN; HUMAN VERSUS ANIMAL COMPARISON; MACACA; MAMMAL; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NATURAL SELECTION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; ORTHOLOGY; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; SPECIES DIVERSITY; SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION; UBIQUITINATION;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ANIMALS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; F-BOX PROTEINS; GENETIC VARIATION; HUMANS; MAMMALS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; RECEPTORS, G-PROTEIN-COUPLED; RECEPTORS, N-METHYL-D-ASPARTATE; RECEPTORS, ODORANT; SELECTION, GENETIC; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

CANIS FAMILIARIS; MAMMALIA; RATTUS;

EID: 78650453703     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msq206     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Alba MM, Castresana J. 2005. Inverse relationship between evolutionary rate and age of mammalian genes. Mol Biol Evol. 22:598-606.
2. Alba MM, Castresana J. 2007. On homology searches by protein Blast and the characterization of the age of genes. BMC Evol Biol. 7:53.
3. Arbiza L, Dopazo J, Dopazo H. 2006. Positive selection, relaxation, and acceleration in the evolution of the human and chimp genome. PLoS Comput Biol. 2:e38.
4. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, et al. (20 co-authors). 2000. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet. 25:25-29.
5. Ayala FJ. 2000. Neutralism and selectionism: the molecular clock. Gene 261:27-33.
6. Baba ML, Goodman M, Berger-Cohn J, Demaille JG, Matsuda G. 1984. The early adaptive evolution of calmodulin. Mol Biol Evol. 1:442-455.
7. Bakewell MA, Shi P, Zhang J. 2007. More genes underwent positive selection in chimpanzee evolution than in human evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 104:7489-7494.
8. Bedford T, Hartl DL. 2008. Overdispersion of the molecular clock: temporal variation of gene-specific substitution rates in Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol. 25:1631-1638.
9. Bedford T, Wapinski I, Hartl DL. 2008. Overdispersion of the molecular clock varies between yeast, Drosophila and mammals. Genetics 179:977-984.
10. Buck L, Axel R. 1991. A novel multigene family may encode odorant receptors: a molecular basis for odor recognition. Cell 65:175-187.
11. Cardozo T, Pagano M. 2004. The SCF ubiquitin ligase: insights into a molecular machine. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 5:739-751.
12. Clark AG, Glanowski S, Nielsen R, et al. (17 co-authors). 2003. Inferring nonneutral evolution from human-chimp-mouse orthologous gene trios. Science 302:1960-1963.
13. Conte C, Ebeling M, Marcuz A, Nef P, Andres-Barquin PJ. 2003. Evolutionary relationships of the Tas2r receptor gene families in mouse and human. Physiol Genomics. 14:73-82.
14. Cruz F, Vila C, Webster MT. 2008. The legacy of domestication: accumulation of deleterious mutations in the dog genome. Mol Biol Evol. 25:2331-2336.
15. Czelusniak J, Goodman M, Hewett-Emmett D, Weiss ML, Venta PJ, Tashian RE. 1982. Phylogenetic origins and adaptive evolution of avian and mammalian haemoglobin genes. Nature 298:297-300.
16. DePristo MA, Weinreich DM, Hartl DL. 2005. Missense meanderings in sequence space: a biophysical view of protein evolution. Nat Rev Genet. 6:678-687.
17. Doolittle RF, Feng DF, Johnson MS, McClure MA. 1986. Relationships of human protein sequences to those of other organisms. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 51(Pt 1):447-455.
18. Farre D, Alba MM. 2009. Heterogeneous patterns of gene expression diversification in mammalian gene duplicates. Mol Biol Evol. 27:325-335.
19. Fischer A, Gilad Y, Man O, Paabo S. 2005. Evolution of bitter taste receptors in humans and apes. Mol Biol Evol. 22:432-436.
20. Flicek P, Aken BL, Beal K, et al. (59 co-authors). 2008. Ensembl 2008. Nucleic Acids Res. 36:D707-D714.
21. Gibbs RA, Rogersj J, Katze MG, et al. (176 co-authors). 2007. Evolutionary and biomedical insights from the rhesus macaque genome. Science 316:222-234.
22. Gilad Y, Bustamante CD, Lancet D, Paabo S. 2003. Natural selection on the olfactory receptor gene family in humans and chimpanzees. Am J Hum Genet. 73:489-501.
23. Gillespie JH. 1989. Lineage effects and the index of dispersion of molecular evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 6:636-647.
24. Go Y, Satta Y, Takenaka O, Takahata N. 2005. Lineage-specific loss of function of bitter taste receptor genes in humans and nonhuman primates. Genetics 170:313-326.
25. Gojobori J, Tang H, Akey JM, Wu CI. 2007. Adaptive evolution in humans revealed by the negative correlation between the polymorphism and fixation phases of evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 104:3907-3912.
26. Gong Y, Lippa CF, Zhu J, Lin Q, Rosso AL. 2009. Disruption of glutamate receptors at Shank-postsynaptic platform in Alzheimer's disease. Brain Res. 1292:191-198.
27. Goodman M, Moore GW, Matsuda G. 1975. Darwinian evolution in the genealogy of haemoglobin. Nature 253:603-608.
28. Goto H, Watanabe K, Araragi N, et al. (12 co-authors). 2009. The identification and functional implications of human-specific "fixed" amino acid substitutions in the glutamate receptor family. BMC Evol Biol. 9:224.
29. Hoekstra HE, Hirschmann RJ, Bundey RA, Insel PA, Crossland JP. 2006. A single amino acid mutation contributes to adaptive beach mouse color pattern. Science 313:101-104.
30. Hughes AL. 2007. Looking for Darwin in all the wrong places: the misguided quest for positive selection at the nucleotide sequence level. Heredity 99:364-373.
31. Jin J, Cardozo T, Lovering RC, Elledge SJ, Pagano M, Harper JW. 2004. Systematic analysis and nomenclature of mammalian F-box proteins. Genes Dev. 18:2573-2580.
32. Jordan IK, Kondrashov FA, Rogozin IB, Tatusov RL, Wolf RL, Koonin EV. 2001. Constant relative rate of protein evolution and detection of functional diversification among bacterial, archaeal and eukaryotic proteins. Genome Biol. 2:RESEARCH0053
33. Kawahara Y, Imanishi T. 2007. A genome-wide survey of changes in protein evolutionary rates across four closely related species of Saccharomyces sensu stricto group. BMC Evol Biol. 7:9.
34. Kim UK, Jorgenson E, Coon H, Leppert M, Risch N, Drayna D. 2003. Positional cloning of the human quantitative trait locus underlying taste sensitivity to phenylthiocarbamide. Science 299:1221-1225.
35. Kimura M, Ota T. 1974. On some principles governing molecular evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 71:2848-2852.
36. Kinnamon SC, Cummings TA. 1992. Chemosensory transduction mechanisms in taste. Annu Rev Physiol. 54:715-731.
37. Kosiol C, Vinar T, da Fonseca RR, Hubisz MJ, Bustamante CD, Nielsen R, Siepel A. 2008. Patterns of positive selection in six Mammalian genomes. PLoS Genet. 4:e1000144.
38. Lindemann B. 1996. Chemoreception: tasting the sweet and the bitter. Curr Biol. 6:1234-1237.
39. Loytynoja A, Goldman N. 2008. Phylogeny-aware gap placement prevents errors in sequence alignment and evolutionary analysis. Science 320:1632-1635.
40. Mallick S, Gnerre S, Muller P, Reich D. 2009. The difficulty of avoiding false positives in genome scans for natural selection. Genome Res. 19:922-933.
41. Malnic B, Godfrey PA, Buck LB. 2004. The human olfactory receptor gene family. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 101:2584-2589. (Pubitemid 38269354)
42. Margoliash E. 1963. Primary structure and evolution of cytochrome c. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 50:672-679.
43. Mombaerts P. 1999. Seven-transmembrane proteins as odorant and chemosensory receptors. Science 286:707-711.
44. Nielsen R, Bustamante C, Clark AG, et al. (13 co-authors). 2005. A scan for positively selected genes in the genomes of humans and chimpanzees. PLoS Biol. 3:e170.
45. Nozawa M, Suzuki Y, Nei M. 2009. Reliabilities of identifying positive selection by the branch-site and the site-prediction methods. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 106:6700-6705.
46. Ohno S. 1970. Evolution by gene duplication. New York: Springer-Verlag.
47. Ohta T. 1973. Slightly deleterious mutant substitutions in evolution. Nature 246:96-98.
48. Ohta T, Ina Y. 1995. Variation in synonymous substitution rates among mammalian genes and the correlation between synonymous and nonsynonymous divergences. J Mol Evol. 41:717-720.
49. 2007. R: a languange and environment for statistical computing. Vienna (Austria): R Fundation for Statistical Computing.
50. Riedel G, Platt B, Micheau J. 2003. Glutamate receptor function in learning and memory. Behav Brain Res. 140:1-47.
51. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572-1574.
52. Safran M, Chalifa-Caspi V, Shmueli O, et al. (16 co-authors). 2003. Human gene-centric databases at the Weizmann Institute of Science: GeneCards, UDB, CroW 21 and HORDE. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:142-146.
53. Scannell DR, Wolfe KH. 2008. A burst of protein sequence evolution and a prolonged period of asymmetric evolution follow gene duplication in yeast. Genome Res. 18:137-147.
54. Schneider A, Souvorov A, Sabath N, Landan G, Gonnet GH, Graur D. 2009. Estimates of positive darwinian selection are inflated by errors in sequencing, annotation and alignment. Genome Biol Evol. 1:114-118.
55. Seo TK, Kishino H, Thorne JL. 2004. Estimating absolute rates of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitution in order to characterize natural selection and date species divergences. Mol Biol Evol. 21:1201-1213.
56. Shapiro BJ, Alm EJ. 2008. Comparing patterns of natural selection across species using selective signatures. PLoS Genet. 4:e23.
57. Shi P, Zhang J, Yang H, Zhang YP. 2003. Adaptive diversification of bitter taste receptor genes in mammalian evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 20:805-814.
58. Skaar JR, D'Angiolella V, Pagan JK, Pagano M. 2009. SnapShot: F Box Proteins II. Cell 137:1358.1358.e1351.
59. Storey JD, Tibshirani R. 2003. Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 100:9440-9445.
60. Toll-Riera M, Bosch N, Bellora N, Castelo R, Armengol L, Estivill X, Alba MM. 2009. Origin of primate orphan genes: a comparative genomics approach. Mol Biol Evol. 26:603-612.
61. Vilella AJ, Severin J, Ureta-Vidal A, Heng L, Durbin R, Birney E. 2009. EnsemblCompara GeneTrees: complete, duplication-aware phylogenetic trees in vertebrates. Genome Res. 19:327-335.
62. Waterston R, Lindblad-Toh HK, Birney E, et al. (222 co-authors). 2002. Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature 420:520-562.
63. Yampolsky LY, Kondrashov FA, Kondrashov AS. 2005. Distribution of the strength of selection against amino acid replacements in human proteins. Hum Mol Genet. 14:3191-3201.
64. Yang Z. 2007. PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol Biol Evol. 24:1586-1591.
65. Yang Z, Nielsen R. 2002. Codon-substitution models for detecting molecular adaptation at individual sites along specific lineages. Mol Biol Evol. 19:908-917.
66. Zhang J. 2003. Evolution of the human ASPM gene, a major determinant of brain size. Genetics 165:2063-2070.
67. Zhang J, Nielsen R, Yang Z. 2005. Evaluation of an improved branch-site likelihood method for detecting positive selection at the molecular level. Mol Biol Evol. 22:2472-2479.
68. Zhao H, Ivic L, Otaki JM, Hashimoto M, Mikoshiba K, Firestein S. 1998. Functional expression of a mammalian odorant receptor. Science 279:237-242.
69. Zuckerkandl E, Pauling L. 1962. Molecular diseases, evolution and genic heterogeneity. In: Kasha M, Pullman B, editors. Horizons in biochemistry. New York: Academic Press. p. 189-225.