Priming From Distractors in Rapid Serial Visual Presentation Is Modulated by Image Properties and Attention

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1595-1608

  Harris, Irina M ^a   Benito, Claire T ^a   Dux, Paul E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Attentional blink; Distractor inhibition; Distractor processing; Object orientation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; ATTENTIONAL BLINK; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); LEARNING; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; REACTION TIME;

ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; ATTENTIONAL BLINK; CUES; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REACTION TIME; SERIAL LEARNING;

EID: 78650156408     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0019218     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Arnell K.M., Killman K.V., Fijavz D. Blinded by emotion: Target misses follow attention capture by arousing distractors in RSVP. Emotion 2007, 7:465-477.
2. Bowman H., Wyble B. The Simultaneous Type, Serial Token model of temporal attention and working memory. Psychological Review 2007, 114:38-70.
3. Chua F.K., Goh J., Hon N. Nature of codes extracted during the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2001, 27:1229-1242.
4. Chun M.M. Types and tokens in visual processing: A double dissociation between the attentional blink and repetition blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1997, 23:738-755.
5. Chun M.M., Potter M.C. A two-stage model for multiple target detection in RSVP. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1995, 21:109-127.
6. Di Lollo V., Kawahara J., Ghorashi S.M.S., Enns J.T. The attentional blink: Resource depletion or temporary loss of control?. Psychological Research 2005, 69:191-200.
7. Drew T., Shapiro K.L. Representational masking and the attentional blink. Visual Cognition 2006, 13:513-528.
8. Dux P.E., Asplund C.L., Marois R. An attentional blink for sequentially presented targets: Evidence in favor of resource depletion accounts. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2008, 15:809-813.
9. Dux P.E., Asplund C.L., Marois R. Both exogenous and endogenous target salience manipulations support resource depletion accounts of the attentional blink: A reply to Olivers, Spalek, Kawahara & Di Lollo (2009). Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2009, 16:219-224.
10. Dux P.E., Coltheart V. The meaning of the mask matters: Evidence of conceptual interference in the attentional blink. Psychological Science 2005, 16:775-779.
11. Dux P.E., Coltheart V., Harris I.M. On the fate of distractor stimuli in rapid serial visual presentation. Cognition 2006, 99:355-382.
12. Dux P.E., Harris I.M. On the failure of distractor inhibition in the attentional blink. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2007, 14:723-728.
13. Dux P.E., Harris I.M. Viewpoint costs arise during consolidation: Evidence from the attentional blink. Cognition 2007, 104:47-58.
14. Dux P.E., Marois R. Distractor inhibition predicts individual differences in the Attentional Blink. PLoS ONE 2008, 3:e3330.
15. Dux P.E., Marois R. How humans search for targets through time: A review of data and theory from the attentional blink. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics 2009, 71:1683-1700.
16. Evans K.K., Treisman A. Perception of objects in natural scenes: Is it really attention free?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31:1476-1492.
17. Folk C.L., Remington R.W., Johnston J.C. Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1992, 18:1030-1044.
18. Forster K.I., Forster J.C. DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 2003, 35:116-124.
19. Forti S., Humphreys G.W. The representation of unseen objects in visual neglect: Effects of view and object identity. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2007, 24:661-680.
20. Guyonneau R., Kirchner H., Thorpe S.J. Animals roll around the clock: The rotation invariance of ultrarapid visual processing. Journal of Vision 2006, 6:1008-1017.
21. Harris I.M., Dux P.E., Benito C.T., Leek E.C. Orientation sensitivity at different stages of object processing: Evidence from repetition priming and naming. PLoS ONE 2008, 3:e2256.
22. Isaak M.I., Shapiro K.L., Martin J. The attentional blink reflects retrieval competition among multiple rapid serial visual presentation items: Tests of an interference model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1999, 25:1774-1792.
23. Johnston J.C., McCann R.S., Remington R.W. Chronometric evidence for two types of attention. Psychological Science 1995, 6:365-369.
24. Jolicoeur P. The time to name disoriented natural objects. Memory and Cognition 1985, 13:289-303.
25. Jolicoeur P., Dell'Acqua R. The demonstration of short-term consolidation. Cognitive Psychology 1998, 32:138-202.
26. Keil A., Ihssen N. Identification facilitation for emotionally arousing verbs during the attentional blink. Emotion 2004, 4:25-35.
27. Livesey E.J., Harris I.M., Harris J.A. Attentional changes during implicit learning: Signal validity protects a target stimulus from the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2009, 35:408-422.
28. Loftus G.R., Masson M.E.J. Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 1994, 1:476-490.
29. Luck S.J., Vogel E.K., Shapiro K.L. Word meaning can be accessed but not reported during the attentional blink. Nature 1996, 383:616-618.
30. Maki W.S., Frigen K., Paulson K. Associative priming by targets and distractors during rapid serial visual presentation: Does word meaning survive the attentional blink?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1997, 23:1014-1034.
31. Maki W.S., Padmanabhan G. Transient suppression of processing during rapid serial visual presentation: Acquired distinctiveness of probes modulates the attentional blink. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 1994, 1:499-504.
32. Marr D. Visual information: The structure and creation of visual representations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London-Series B: Biological Sciences 1980, 290:199-218.
33. Martens S., Wolters G., van Raamsdonk M. Blinks of the mind: Memory effects of attentional processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2002, 28:1275-1287.
34. Most S.B., Chun M.M., Widders D.M., Zald D.H. Attentional rubbernecking: Cognitive control and personality in emotion-induced blindness. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2005, 12:654-661.
35. Most S.B., Junge J.A. Don't look back: Retroactive, dynamic costs and benefits of emotional capture. Visual Cognition 2008, 16:262-278.
36. Murray J.E. Negative priming by rotated objects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 1995, 2:534-537.
37. Nieuwenstein M.R., Potter M.C. Temporal limits of selection and memory encoding: A comparison of whole versus partial report in rapid serial visual presentation. Psychological Science 2006, 17:471-475.
38. Nieuwenstein M.R., Potter M.C., Theeuwes J. Unmasking the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2009, 35:159-169.
39. Olivers C.N.L., Meeter M. A boost and bounce theory of temporal attention. Psychological Review 2008, 115:836-863.
40. Olivers C.N.L., Van der Stigchel S., Hulleman J. Spreading the sparing: Against a limited-capacity account of the attentional blink. Psychological Research 2007, 71:126-139.
41. Olivers C.N.L., Watson D.G. Input control processes in rapid serial visual presentations: Target selection and distractor inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32:1083-1092.
42. Pesciarelli F., Kutas M., Dell'Acqua R., Peressotti F., Job R., Urbach T.P. Semantic and repetition priming within the attentional blink: An event-related brain potential (ERP) investigation study. Biological Psychology 2007, 76:21-30.
43. Potter M.C. Meaning in visual search. Science 1975, 189:965-966.
44. Potter M.C. Short-term conceptual memory for pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 1976, 2:509-522.
45. Potter M.C., Chun M.M., Banks B.S., Muckenhoupt M. Two attentional deficits in serial target search: The visual attentional blink and an amodal task-switch deficit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1998, 24:979-992.
46. Raymond J.E., O'Brien J.L. Selective visual attention and motivation: The consequences of value learning in an attentional blink task. Psychological Science 2009, 20:981-988.
47. Raymond J.E., Shapiro K.L., Arnell K.M. Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1992, 18:849-860.
48. Rogers T.T., Lambon Ralph M.A., Garrard P., Bozeat S., McClelland J.L., Hodges J.R., et al. Structure and deterioration of semantic memory: A neuropsychological and computational investigation. Psychological Review 2004, 111:205-235.
49. Seifert A., Di Lollo V. Low-level masking in the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1997, 23:1061-1073.
50. Shapiro K.L., Caldwell J.I., Sorensen R.E. Personal names and the attentional blink: A visual " cocktail party" effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1997, 23:504-514.
51. Shapiro K.L., Driver J., Ward R., Sorensen R.E. Priming from the attentional blink: A failure to extract visual tokens but not visual types. Psychological Science 1997, 8:95-100.
52. Shapiro K.L., Raymond J.E., Arnell K.M. Attention to visual pattern information produces the attentional blink in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1994, 20:357-371.
53. Snodgrass J.G., Vanderwart M. A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 1980, 6:174-215.
54. Stankiewicz B.J., Hummel J.E., Cooper E.E. The role of attention in priming for left-right reflections of object images: Evidence for a dual representation of object shape. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24:732-744.
55. Taatgen N.A., Juvina I., Schipper M., Borst J.P., Martens S. Too much control can hurt: A threaded cognition model of the attentional blink. Cognitive Psychology 2009, 59:1-29.
56. Thorpe S., Fize D., Marlot C. Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature 1996, 381:520-522.
57. Tipper S.P. The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A 1985, 37:571-590.
58. Ullman S., Bart E. Recognition invariance obtained by extended and invariant features. Neural Networks 2004, 17:833-848.
59. Ullman S., Vidal-Naquet M., Sali E. Visual features of intermediate complexity and their use in classification. Nature Neuroscience 2002, 5:682-687.
60. VanRullen R., Thorpe S. The time course of visual processing: From early perception to decision-making. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2001, 13:454-461.
61. Vernier M.-P., Humphreys G.W. A deficit in contralesional object representation associated with attentional limitations after parietal damage. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2006, 23:1104-1129.
62. Visser T.A.W., Bischof W.F., Di Lollo V. Attentional switching in spatial and nonspatial domains: Evidence from the attentional blink. Psychological Bulletin 1999, 125:458-469.
63. Wyble B., Bowman H., Nieuwenstein M.R. The attentional blink provides episodic distinctiveness: Sparing at a cost. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2009, 35:787-807.