A deficit in contralesional object representation associated with attentional limitations after parietal damage

Cognitive Neuropsychology

Volumn 23, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 1104-1129

  Vernier, Marie Pierre ^a   Humphreys, Glyn W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTENTION DISTURBANCE; BRAIN DAMAGE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; EYE FIXATION; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMAN; LEFT HEMISPHERE; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PARIETAL LOBE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 33750182159     PISSN: 02643294     EISSN: 14640627     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02643290600668798     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Bartolomeo, P. (1998) L'héminégligence spatiale de la perception à l'action Revue de Neuropsychologie, 8, pp. 83-99.
2. Bartram, D. (1976) Levels of coding in picture-picture comparison tasks Memory and Cognition, 4, pp. 593-602.
3. Baylis, G. and Driver, J. and Rafal, R. (1993) Visual extinction and stimulus repetition Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, pp. 453-466.
4. Berti, A. and Rizzolatti, G. (1992) Visual processing without awareness: Evidence from unilateral neglect Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 4, pp. 345-351.
5. Biederman, I. (1987) Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding Psychological Review, 94, pp. 115-147.
6. Biederman, I. and Bar, M. (1999) One-shot viewpoint invariance in matching novel objects Vision Research, 39, pp. 2885-2899.
7. Biederman, I. and Cooper, E. (1991) Evidence for complete translational and reflectional invariance in visual object priming Perception, 20, pp. 585-593.
8. Biederman, I. and Cooper, E. (1992) Size invariance in human shape recognition Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, pp. 121-133.
9. Biederman, I. and Gehardstein, P. (1993) Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, pp. 1162-1182.
10. Bisiach, E. and Capitani, E. and Luzzatti, C. and Perani, D. (1981) Brain and conscious representation of outside reality Neuropsychologia, 19, pp. 543-551.
11. Bülthoff, H. and Edelman, S. (1992) Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 89, pp. 60-64.
12. Burgund, E. and Marsolek, C. (2000) Viewpoint-invariant and viewpoint-dependent object recognition in dissociable neural subsystems Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7, pp. 480-489.
13. Cohen, A. and Ivry, R. (1991) Density effects in conjunction search: Evidence for a coarse location mechanism of feature integration Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, pp. 891-901.
14. Cohen, A. and Ivry, R. and Rafal, R. and Kohn, C. (1995) Activating response codes by stimuli in the neglected visual field Neuropsychology, 9, pp. 165-173.
15. Cohen, A. and Rafal, R. (1991) Attention and feature integration: Illusory conjunctions in a patient with a parietal lobe lesion Psychological Science, 2, pp. 106-110.
16. Corbetta, M. and Miezin, F. and Shulman, G. and Petersen, S. (1993) A PET study of visuospatial attention The Journal of Neuroscience, 13, pp. 1202-1226.
17. Coull, J. and Nobre, A. (1998) Where and when to pay attention: The neural systems for directing attention to spatial locations and to time intervals as revealed by both PET and fMRI The Journal of Neuroscience, 18, pp. 7426-7435.
18. Duncan, J. and Humphreys, G. and Ward, R. (1997) Competitive brain activity in visual attention Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 7, pp. 255-261.
19. Edelman, S. and Bülthoff, H. (1992) Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of three dimensional objects Vision Research, 32, pp. 2385-2400.
20. Ellis, R. and Allport, D. and Humphreys, G. and Collis, J. (1989) Varieties of object constancy Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, pp. 775-796.
21. Fiser, J. and Biederman, I. (1995) Size invariance in visual object priming of gray-scale images Perception, 24, pp. 741-748.
22. Forti, S. and Humphreys, G. (2004) Visuo-motor cueing through tool use in unilateral neglect Journal of General Psychology, 131, pp. 379-410.
23. Friedman-Hill, S. and Robertson, L. and Treisman, A. (1995) Parietal contributions to visual feature binding: Evidence from a patient with bilateral lesions Science, 269, pp. 853-855.
24. Gado, M. and Hanaway, J. and Frank, R. (1979) Functional anatomy of the cerebral cortex by computed tomography Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 3, pp. 1-19.
25. Gilchrist, I. and Humphreys, G. and Riddoch, M. (1996) Grouping and extinction: Evidence for low-level modulation of selection Cognitive Neuropsychology, 13, pp. 1223-1256.
26. Halligan, P. and Marshall, J. (1994) Toward a principled explanation of unilateral neglect Cognitive Neuropsychology, 11, pp. 167-206.
27. Heilman, K. and Valenstein, E. (1979) Mechanisms underlying hemispatial neglect Annals of Neurology, 5, pp. 166-170.
28. Heinke, D. and Humphreys, G. (2003) Attention, spatial representation, and visual neglect: Simulating emergent attention and spatial memory in the selective attention for identification model (SAIM) Psychological Review, 110, pp. 29-87.
29. Hinton, G. and Parsons, L.(1981) Frames of reference and mental imagery. In Attention and performance IX. (pp. 261-277). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
30. Hulleman, J. and Humphreys, G. (2006) Maximising the power of comparing single cases against control samples: An argument, a program for making comparisons and a worked example from the Pyramids & Palm Trees test. Manuscript submitted for publication
31. Hummel, J. and Biederman, I. (1992) Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition Psychological Review, 99, pp. 480-517.
32. Hummel, J. and Stankiewicz, B. (1996) Categorical relations in shape perception Spatial Vision, 10, pp. 201-236.
33. Hummel, J. and Stankiewicz, B. (1998) Two roles for attention in shape perception: A structural description model of visual scrutiny Visual Cognition, 5, pp. 49-79.
34. Humphrey, G. and Khan, S. (1992) Recognizing novel views of three dimensional objects. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, pp. 170-190.
35. Humphreys, G. (2003) Conscious visual representations built from multiple binding processes: Evidence from neuropsychology Progress in Brain Research, 142, pp. 243-255.
36. Humphreys, G. and Cinel, C. and Wolfe, J. and Olson, A. and Klempen, N. (2000) Fractionating the binding process: Neuropsychological evidence distinguishing binding of form from binding of surface features Vision Research, 40, pp. 1569-1596.
37. Humphreys, G. and Forde, E. (1998) Disordered action schema and action disorganisation syndrome Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15, pp. 771-812.
38. Humphreys, G. and Heinke, D. (1998) Spatial representation and selection in the brain: Neuropsychological and computational constraints Visual Cognition, 5, pp. 9-47.
39. Humphreys, G. and Riddoch, M. (1984) Routes to object constancy: Implications from neurological impairments of object constancy Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36A, pp. 385-415.
40. Humphreys, G. and Riddoch, M. (2001) Detection by action: Evidence for affordances in search in neglect Nature Neuroscience, 4, pp. 84-88.
41. Humphreys, G. and Riddoch, M. (2003) A case series analysis of category-specific deficits of living things: The HIT account Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, pp. 263-306.
42. Karnath, H. (1988) Deficits of attention in acute and recovered visual hemi-neglect Neuropsychologia, 26, pp. 27-43.
43. Karnath, H. and Ferber, S. and Himmelbach, M. (2001) Spatial awareness is a function of the temporal not the posterior parietal lobe Nature, 411, pp. 950-953.
44. Kinsbourne, M. (1970) The cerebral basis of lateral asymmetries in attention Acta Psychologia, 33, pp. 193-201.
45. Lawson, R. and Humphreys, G. (1996) View specificity in object processing: Evidence from picture matching Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, pp. 395-416.
46. Lawson, R. and Humphreys, G. (1998) View-specific effects of depth rotation and foreshortening on the initial recognition and priming of familiar objects Perception and Psychophysics, 60, pp. 1052-1066.
47. Marr, D.(1982) Vision. New York: Freeman and Co.
48. Marr, D. and Nishihara, H. (1978) Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three dimensional shapes Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 200, pp. 269-294.
49. Mattingley, J. and Davis, G. and Driver, J. (1997) Preattentive filling-in of visual surfaces in parietal extinction Science, 275, pp. 671-674.
50. McGlinchey-Berroth, R. and Milberg, W. and Verfaellie, M. and Alexander, M. and Kilduff, P. (1993) Semantic processing in the neglected visual field: Evidence from a lexical decision task Cognitive Neuropsychology, 10, pp. 79-108.
51. McKenna, P. and Warrington, E.(1983) Graded naming test: Object picture book. Cambridge: Cambridge Cognition.
52. Milner, A. and Goodale, M.(1995) The visual brain in action. London: Academic Press.
53. Mort, D. and Malhotra, P. and Mannan, S. and Rorden, C. and Pambakian, A. and Kennard, C. (2003) The anatomy of visual neglect Brain, 126, pp. 1986-1997.
54. Mozer, M. and Behrmann, M. (1990) On the interaction of selective attention and lexical knowledge: A connectionist account Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2, pp. 96-123.
55. Mycroft, R. and Mitchell, D. and Kay, J. (2002) An evaluation of statistical procedures for comparing an individual's performance with that of a group of controls Cognitive Neuropsychology, 19, pp. 291-300.
56. Nobre, A. and Sebestyen, G. and Gitelman, D. and Mesulam, M. and Frackowiak, R. and Frith, C. (1997) Functional localisation of the system for visuospatial attention using positron emission topography Brain, 120, pp. 515-533.
57. Pardo, J. and Fox, P. and Raichle, M. (1991) Localisation of a human system for sustained attention by positron emission tomography Nature, 349, pp. 61-64.
58. Pinker, S. (1984) Visual cognition: An introduction Cognition, 18, pp. 1-63.
59. Poggio, T. and Edelman, S. (1990) A network that learns to recognise three dimensional objects Nature, 343, pp. 263-266.
60. Pollmann, S. and Weidner, R. and Humphreys, G. and Olivers, C. and Muller, K. and Lohmann, G. (2003) Separating distractor rejection and target detection in posterior parietal cortex - an event-related fMRI study of visual marking Neuroimage, 18, pp. 310-323.
61. Posner, M. (1994) Local and distributed processes in attentional orienting Behavioral and Brain Science, 17, pp. 78-79.
62. Posner, M. and Walker, J. and Friedrich, F. and Rafal, R. (1984) Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention The Journal of Neuroscience, 4, pp. 1863-1874.
63. Posner, M. and Walker, J. and Friedrich, F. and Rafal, R. (1987) How do the parietal lobes direct covert attention? Neuropsychologia, 25, pp. 135-145.
64. Riddoch, M. and Humphreys, G. (1983) The effect of cueing on unilateral neglect Neuropsychologia, 21, pp. 589-599.
65. Riddoch, M. and Humphreys, G. and Jacobson, S. and Pluck, G. and Bateman, A. and Edwards, M. (2004) Impaired orientation discrimination and localization following parietal damage: On the interplay between dorsal and ventral processes in visual perception Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21, pp. 597-624.
66. Shalev, L. and Humphreys, G. (2000) Biased attentional shifts associated with damage to the right parietal lobe Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, pp. 339-365.
67. Shalev, L. and Humphreys, G. (2002) Implicit location encoding via stored representations of familiar objects: Neuropsychological evidence Cognitive Neuropsychology, 19, pp. 721-744.
68. Stankiewicz, B. and Hummel, J. and Cooper, E. (1998) The role of attention in priming for left-right reflections of object images: Evidence for a dual representation of object shape Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, pp. 732-744.
69. Tarr, M. (1995) Rotating objects to recognise them: A case study of the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three dimensional objects Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2, pp. 55-82.
70. Tarr, M. and Bülthoff, H. (1998) Image-based object recognition in man, monkey and machine Cognition, 67, pp. 1-20.
71. Tarr, M. and Pinker, S. (1989) Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition Cognitive Psychology, 21, pp. 233-282.
72. Thorpe, S. (1995) La reconnaissance visuelle: De la retine au cortex temporal inferotemporal Revue de Neuropsychologie, 5, pp. 389-410.
73. Treisman, A. (1988) Feature and objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, pp. 201-237.
74. Treisman, A. (1998) Feature binding, attention, and object perception Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 353, pp. 1295-1306.
75. Treisman, A. and Gelade, G. (1980) A feature integration theory of attention Cognitive Psychology, 12, pp. 97-136.
76. Ullman, S. (1989) Aligning pictorial descriptions: An approach to object recognition Cognition, 32, pp. 193-254.
77. Ungerleider, L. and Mishkin, M.(1982) Two cortical visual systems. In Analysis of visual behavior. (pp. 549-586). Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
78. Ward, R. and Goodrich, S. and Driver, J. (1994) Grouping reduces visual extinction: Neuropsychological evidence for weight-linkage in visual selection Visual Cognition, 1, pp. 101-129.
79. Warrington, E. (1982) Neuropsychological studies of object recognition Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences, 298, pp. 15-33.
80. Warrington, E. and James, M. (1986) Visual object recognition in patients with right-hemisphere lesions: Axes or features? Perception, 15, pp. 355-366.
81. Young, A. and Hellawell, D. and Welch, J. (1992) Neglect and visual recognition Brain, 112, pp. 51-71.