Distractor inhibition predicts individual differences in the attentional blink

PLoS ONE

Volumn 3, Issue 10, 2008, Pages

  Dux, Paul E ^a   Marois, René ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTRACTIBILITY; EYELID REFLEX; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MENTAL CONCENTRATION; NORMAL HUMAN; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; ATTENTIONAL BLINK; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ATTENTIONAL BLINK; HUMANS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 53749100173     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003330     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Watson DG, Humphreys GW (1997) Visual marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects. Psychological Review 104: 90-122.
2. Bundesen C, Habekost T, Kyllingsbæk S (2005) A neural theory of visual attention: Bridging cognition and neurophysiology. Psychological Review 112: 291-328.
3. Desimone R, Duncan J (1995) Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience 18: 193-222.
4. Raymond JE, Shapiro KL, Arnell KM (1992) Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 18: 849-860.
5. Chun MM, Potter MC (1995) A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21: 109-127.
6. Di Lollo V, Kawahara J, Ghorashi SMS, Enns JT (2005) The attentional blink: Resource depletion or a temporary loss of control. Psychological Research 69: 191-200.
7. Olivers CNL, van der Stigchel S, Hulleman J (2007) Spreading the sparing: against a limited-capacity account of the attentional blink. Psychological Research 71: 126-139.
8. Dux PE, Coltheart V (2005) The meaning of the mask matters: Evidence of conceptual interference in the attentional blink. Psychological Science 16: 775-779.
9. Martens S, Munneke J, Smid H, Johnson A (2006) Quick minds don't blink: Electrophysiological correlates of individual differences in attentional selection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18: 1423-1438.
10. Dux PE, Coltheart V, Harris IM (2006) On the fate of distractor stimuli in rapid serial visual presentation. Cognition 99: 355-382.
11. Olivers CNL, Watson DG (2006) Input Control Processes in Rapid Serial Visual Presentations: Target Selection and Distractor Inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 32: 1083-1093.
12. Maki WS, Padmanabhan G (1994) Transient suppression of processing during rapid serial visual presentation: Acquired distinctiveness of probes modulates the attentional blink. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1: 499-504.
13. Dux PE, Harris IM (2007) On the failure of distractor inhibition in the attentional blink. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 14: 723-728.
14. Tipper SP (2001) Does negative priming reflect inhibitory mechanisms? A review and integration of conflicting views. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 54A: 321-343.
15. Pelli DG (1997) The videotoolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision 10: 437-442.
16. Brainard DH (1997) The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision 10: 433-436.
17. Maki WS, Frigen K, Paulson K (1997) Associative priming by targets and distractors during rapid serial visual presentation: Does word meaning survive the attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 23: 1014-1034.
18. Nigg JT (2000) On inhibition/disinhibition in developmental psychopathology: Views from cognitive and personality psychology and a working inhibition taxonomy. Psychological Bulletin 126: 220-246.