On the fate of distractor stimuli in rapid serial visual presentation

Cognition

Volumn 99, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 355-382

  Dux, Paul E ^a   Coltheart, Veronika ^a   Harris, Irina M ^a  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Attentional Blink; Distractor Inhibition; Distractor Repetition Effect; Masking; Rapid Serial Visual Presentation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLINKING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTRACTIBILITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STANDARDIZATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; BLINKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33645843652     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.04.002     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Awh E., Serences J., Laurey P., Dhaliwal H., van der Jagt T., and Dassonville P. Evidence against a central bottleneck during the attentional blink: Multiple channels for configural and featural processing. Cognitive Psychology 48 (2004) 95-126
2. Bavelier D. Repetition blindness between visually different items: The case of pictures and words. Cognition 51 (1994) 199-236
3. Bjork E.L., and Murray J.T. On the nature of input channels in visual processing. Psychological Review 84 (1977) 472-484
4. Botella J., Barriopedro M.I., and Suero M. A model of the formation of illusory conjunctions in the time domain. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 27 (2001) 1452-1467
5. Botella J., and Eriksen C.W. Pattern changes in rapid serial visual presentation tasks without strategic shifts. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 29 (1991) 105-108
6. Broadbent D.E., and Broadbent M.H.P. From detection to identification: Response to multiple targets in rapid serial visual presentation. Perception and Psychophysics 42 (1987) 105-113
7. Chun M.M. Temporal binding errors are redistributed by the attentional blink. Perception and Psychophysics 59 (1997) 1191-1199
8. Chun M.M. Types and tokens in visual processing: A double dissociation between the attentional blink and repetition blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 23 (1997) 738-755
9. Chun M.M., and Potter M.C. A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21 (1995) 109-127
10. Chun M.M., and Potter M.C. The attentional blink and task switching within and across modalities. In: Shapiro K. (Ed). The limits of attention: Temporal constraints in human information processing (2001), Oxford University Press, Oxford 20-35
11. Coltheart M., Rastle K., Perry C., Langdon R., and Ziegler J. DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review 108 (2001) 204-256
12. Di Lollo V., Kawahara J., Ghorashi S.M.S., and Enns J.T. The attentional blink: Resource depletion or temporary loss of control. Psychological Research 69 (2005) 179-190
13. Duncan J. Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113 (1984) 501-517
14. Duncan J., Ward R., and Shapiro K.L. Direct measurement of attentional dwell time in human vision. Nature 369 (1994) 313-315
15. Dux, P.E., & Harris, I.M. (2004). Object orientation and the attentional blink: Tests of a two-stage model of object recognition. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Visual Sciences Society, Sarasota.
16. Egeth H.E., and Santee J.L. Conceptual and perceptual components of interletter inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 7 (1981) 506-517
17. Estes W.K. Interactions of signal and background variables in visual processing. Perception and Psychophysics 12 (1972) 278-286
18. Forster K.I., and Forster J.C. DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 35 (2003) 116-124
19. Giesbrecht B., Bischof W.F., and Kingstone A. Visual masking during the attentional blink: Tests of the object substitution hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 29 (2003) 238-255
20. Giesbrecht B., Bischof W.F., and Kingstone A. Seeing the light: Adapting luminance reveals low-level visual processes in the attentional blink. Brain and Cognition 55 (2004) 307-309
21. Giesbrecht B., and Di Lollo V. Beyond the attentional blink: Visual masking by object substitution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24 (1998) 1454-1456
22. Grandison T.D., Ghirardelli T.G., and Egeth H.E. Beyond similarity: Masking of the target is sufficient to cause the attentional blink. Perception and Psychophysics 59 (1997) 266-274
23. Isaak M.I., Shapiro K.L., and Martin J. The attentional blink reflects retrieval competition among multiple rapid serial visual presentation items: Tests of an interference model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26 (1999) 1774-1792
24. 1 decisions. Memory and Cognition 26 (1998) 1014-1032
25. Jolicoeur P. Concurrent response-selection demands modulate the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25 (1999) 1097-1113
26. Kanwisher N. Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation. Cognition 27 (1987) 117-143
27. Kanwisher N. Repetition blindness and illusory conjunctions: Errors in binding visual types with visual tokens. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 17 (1991) 404-421
28. Loach D., and Mari-Beffa P. Post-target inhibition: A temporal binding mechanism?. Visual Cognition 10 (2003) 513-526
29. Luck S.J., Vogel E.K., and Shapiro K.L. Word meanings can be accessed but not reported during the attentional blink. Nature 383 (1996) 616-618
30. Luo C., and Caramazza A. Temporal and spatial repetition blindness: Effects of presentation mode and repetition lag on the perception of repeated items. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 22 (1996) 95-113
31. Mack A., and Rock I. Inattentional blindness: Perception without attention (1998), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
32. Maki W.S., Bussard G., Lopez K., and Digby B. Sources of interference in the attentional blink: Target-distractor similarity revisited. Perception and Psychophysics 65 (2003) 188-201
33. Maki W.S., Frigen K., and Paulson K. Associative priming by targets and distractors during rapid serial visual presentation: Does word meaning survive the attentional blink?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 23 (1997) 1014-1034
34. Maki W.S., and Padmanabhan G. Transient suppression of processing during rapid serial visual presentation: Acquired distinctiveness of probes modulates the attentional blink. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 1 (1994) 499-504
35. McClelland J.L., and Rumelhart D.E. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review 88 (1981) 375-407
36. McLaughlin E.N., Shore D.I., and Klein R.M. The attentional blink is immune to masking-induced data limits. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 54A (2001) 169-196
37. Olson I.R., Chun M.M., and Anderson A.K. Effects of phonological length on the attentional blink for words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 27 (2001) 1116-1123
38. Potter M.C., Chun M.M., Banks B.S., and Muckenhoupt M. Two attentional deficits in serial target search: The visual attentional blink and an amodal task-switch deficit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24 (1998) 979-992
39. Potter M.C., and Levy E.I. Recognition memory for a rapid sequence of pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (1969) 10-15
40. Potter M.C., Staub A., and O'Connor D.H. The time course of competition for attention: Attention is initially labile. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 28 (2002) 1149-1162
41. Raymond J.E., Shapiro K.L., and Arnell K.M. Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 18 (1992) 849-860
42. Seiffert A., and Di Lollo V. Low-level masking in the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 23 (1997) 1061-1073
43. Shapiro K.L., Arnell K.M., and Raymond J.E. The attentional blink. Trends in Cognitive Science 1 (1997) 291-296
44. Shapiro K.L., Driver J., Ward R., and Sorensen R.E. Priming from the attentional blink: A failure to extract visual tokens but not visual types. Psychological Science 8 (1997) 95-100
45. Shapiro K.L., Raymond J.E., and Arnell K.M. Attention to visual pattern information produces the attentional blink in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20 (1994) 357-371
46. Snodgrass J.G., and Vanderwart M. A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 6 (1980) 174-215
47. Tipper S.P. The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology (1985) 571-590
48. Treisman A.M., and Gelade G. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology 12 (1980) 97-136
49. Visser T.A.W., Bischof W.F., and Di Lollo V. Rapid serial visual distraction: Task-irrelevant items can produce an attentional blink. Perception and Psychophysics 66 (2005) 1418-1432
50. Vogel E.K., Luck S.J., and Shapiro K.L. Electrophysiological evidence for a postperceptual locus of suppression during the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24 (1998) 1656-1674
51. Ward R., Duncan J., and Shapiro K. The slow time-course of visual attention. Cognitive Psychology 30 (1996) 79-109
52. Weichselgartner E., and Sperling G. Dynamics of automatic and controlled visual attention. Science 238 (1987) 778-780