Viewpoint costs occur during consolidation: Evidence from the attentional blink

Cognition

Volumn 104, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 47-58

  Dux, Paul E ^a   Harris, Irina M ^b  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Attentional blink; Object recognition

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COGNITION; COLOR; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; NORMAL HUMAN; ORIENTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; SEMANTICS;

ATTENTION; BLINKING; HUMANS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 34247205277     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.05.004     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bülthoff H.H., and Edelman S. Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 89 (1992) 60-64
2. Chun M.M. Types and tokens in visual processing: a double dissociation between the attentional blink and repetition blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 23 (1997) 738-755
3. Chun M.M., and Potter M.C. A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21 (1995) 109-127
4. Corballis M.C. Recognition of disoriented shapes. Psychological Review 95 (1988) 115-123
5. Duncan J. The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli. Psychological Review 87 (1980) 272-300
6. Dux P.E., and Coltheart V. The meaning of the mask matters: evidence of conceptual interference in the attentional blink. Psychological Science 16 (2005) 775-779
7. Forster K.I., and Forster J.C. DMDX: a windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 35 (2003) 116-124
8. Grandison T.D., Ghirardelli T.G., and Egeth H.E. Beyond similarity: masking of the target is sufficient to cause the attentional blink. Perception & Psychophysics 59 (1997) 266-274
9. Harris I.M., and Dux P.E. Orientation-invariant object recognition: evidence from repetition blindness. Cognition 95 (2005) 73-93
10. Harris I.M., and Dux P.E. Turning objects on their head: the influence of the stored axis on object individuation. Perception & Psychophysics 67 (2005) 1010-1015
11. Harris I.M., Harris J.A., and Caine D. Object orientation agnosia: a failure to find the axis?. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 13 (2001) 800-812
12. Hayward W.G. After the viewpoint debate: where next in object recognition?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (2003) 425-427
13. Jolicoeur P. The time to name disoriented natural objects. Memory and Cognition 13 (1985) 289-303
14. Jolicoeur P. On the role of mental rotation and feature extraction in the identification of disoriented objects: a dual-system theory. Mind and Language 5 (1990) 387-410
15. Jolicoeur P. Concurrent response-selection demands modulate the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25 (1999) 1097-1113
16. Kanwisher N. Repetition blindness: type recognition without token individuation. Cognition 27 (1987) 117-143
17. Leek E.C., and Johnston S.J. A polarity effect in misoriented object recognition: the role of polar features in the computation of orientation-invariant shape representation. Visual Cognition 13 (2006) 573-600
18. Luck S.J., Vogel E.K., and Shapiro K.L. Word meanings can be accessed but not reported during the attentional blink. Nature 383 (1996) 616-618
19. Maki W.S., Frigen K., and Paulson K. Associative priming by targets and distractors during rapid serial visual presentation: does word meaning survive the attentional blink?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 23 (1997) 1014-1034
20. Marois R., Yi D.-J., and Chun M.M. The neural fate of consciously perceived and missed events in the attentional blink. Neuron 41 (2004) 465-472
21. McLaughlin E.N., Shore D.I., and Klein R.M. The attentional blink is immune to masking-induced data limits. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 54 A (2001) 169-196
22. McMullen P.A., and Farah M.J. Viewer-centered and object-centered representations in the recognition of naturalistic line drawings. Psychological Science 2 (1991) 275-277
23. Neisser U. Cognitive psychology (1967), Springer, Appleton-Century-Crofts
24. Olson I.R., Chun M.M., and Anderson A.K. Effects of phonological length on the attentional blink for words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 27 (2001) 1116-1123
25. Potter M.C. Meaning in visual search. Science 187 (1975) 965-966
26. Raymond J.E., Shapiro K.L., and Arnell K.M. Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 18 (1992) 849-860
27. Shapiro K.L., Arnell K.M., and Raymond J.E. The attentional blink. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1 (1997) 291-296
28. Shapiro K.L., Driver J., Ward R., and Sorensen R.E. Priming from the attentional blink: a failure to extract visual tokens but not visual types. Psychological Science 8 (1997) 95-100
29. Snodgrass J.G., and Vanderwart M. A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 6 (1980) 174-215
30. Tarr M.J., and Pinker S. Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition. Cognitive Psychology 21 (1989) 233-282
31. Tarr M.J., and Pinker S. When does human object recognition use a viewer-centered reference frame?. Psychological Science 1 (1990) 253-256
32. Treisman A., and Gelade G. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology 12 (1980) 97-136
33. Vogel E.K., Luck S.J., and Shapiro K.L. Electrophysiological evidence for a postperceptual locus of suppression during the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24 (1998) 1656-1674