HCI & sustainable food culture: A design framework for engagement

NordiCHI 2010: Extending Boundaries - Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 112-127

  Choi, Jaz Hee Jeong ^a   Blevis, Eli ^b  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Design; Food; HCI; Sustainability; Transdisciplinarity; Urban informatics

Indexed keywords

FOOD; HCI; INFORMATICS; SUSTAINABILITY; TRANSDISCIPLINARITY;

DESIGN; INFORMATION SCIENCE; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; POPULATION STATISTICS; RURAL AREAS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; URBAN PLANNING;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 78650092900     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1868914.1868931     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Bateman, S., Gutwin, C., Osgood, N., and McCalla, G. 2009. Interactive usability instrumentation. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering interactive Computing Systems, 45-54.
2. Castillo, J. C., Hartson, H. R., and Hix, D. 1998. Remote usability evaluation: can users report their own critical incidents?. In CHI 98 Conference Summary on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 253-254.
3. Coolican, H., Research Methods and Statistics in Psychology, 3rd ed. Hodder & Stoughton, 1999.
4. Frøkjær, E., Hertzum, M., and Hornbæk, K. (2000). Measuring usability: are effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction really correlated? In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI Letters, 2(1), 345-352.
5. Frøkjær, E. & Hornbæk, K. Cooperative Usability Testing: Complementing Usability Tests With User-Supported Interpretation Sessions, Proc. CHI '05 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, ACM Press (2005), 1383-1386.
6. Følstad, A. Work-Domaine Experts As Evaluators: Usability Inspection of Domain-Specific Work-Support Systems, IJHCI, 22, 3 (2007), 217-245.
7. Grossman, T., Fitzmaurice, G., and Attar, R. 2009. A survey of software learnability: metrics, methodologies and guidelines. In Proceedings of the 27th international Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 649-658.
8. Hartson, H. R., Castillo, J. C., Kelso, J., and Neale, W. C. 1996. Remote evaluation: the network as an extension of the usability laboratory. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 228-235.
9. Hartson, H. R. and Castillo, J. C. 1998. Remote evaluation for post-deployment usability improvement. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual interfaces (L'Aquila, Italy, May 24 - 27, 1998). T. Catarci, M. F. Costabile, G. Santucci, and L. Taranfino, Eds. AVI '98. ACM, New York, NY, 22-29.
10. Hornbæk, K. 2006. Current practice in measuring usability: Challenges to usability studies and research. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 64, 2 (Feb. 2006), 79-102.
11. Hornbæk, K. and Frøkjær, E. (2005). Comparing usability problems and redesign proposals as input to practical systems development. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Portland, Oregon, USA, April 02 - 07, 2005). CHI '05. ACM, New York, NY, 391-400.
12. Hornbæk, K. and Frøkjær, E. (2008). Making use of business goals in usability evaluation: an experiment with novice evaluators. In Proceeding of the Twenty-Sixth Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 903-912.
13. Hornbæk, K. and Frøkjær, E. (2008). Comparison of techniques for matching of usability problem descriptions. Interact. Comput. 20, 6 (Dec. 2008), 505-514.
14. Howarth, J., Smith-Jackson, T., and Hartson, R. 2009. Supporting novice usability practitioners with usability engineering tools. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 67, 6 (Jun. 2009), 533-549.
15. ISO 9241-11. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) - Part 11: Guidance on usability. International Organization for Standardization, 1998.
16. Ivory, M. Y. and Hearst, M. A. 2001. The state of the art in automating usability evaluation of user interfaces. ACM Comput. Surv. 33, 4 (Dec. 2001), 470-516.
17. Jacobsen, N. E., Hertzum, M., & John, B. E. (1998b). The Evaluator Effect in Usability Tests. Conference Summary of CHI'98 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 255-256.
18. James, W. 1890. Principles of Psychology. Henry Holt & Co., (Chapter XV, The Perception of Time)
19. Kim, J. H., Gunn, D. V., Schuh, E., Phillips, B., Pagulayan, R. J., and Wixon, D. 2008. Tracking real-time user experience (TRUE): a comprehensive instrumentation solution for complex systems. In Proceeding of the 26th Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 443-452.
20. Kjeldskov, J., Skov, M. and Stage, J. Instant Data Analysis. In Proc. Nordichi 2004 (2004), 233-240.
21. Lewis, J. Sample size for usability studies: Additional considerations. Human Factors, 36 (1994), 368-378.
22. Nørgaard, M. & Hornbæk, K. What Do Usability Evaluators Do in Practice?: an Explorative Study of Think-Aloud Testing, Proc. of the 6th conference on Designing Interactive systems, ACM (2006), 209-218.
23. Nørgaard, M. & Hornbæk, K. Working together to Improve Usability: Exploring Challenges and Successful Practices. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, 6(1) (2010), 33-53.
24. Preece, J. et al. Human-Computer Interaction, Addison-Wesley, 1999.
25. Spool, J. and Shroeder, W. Testing web sites: five users is nowhere near enough. In Proc. CHI 2001 (2001), 285-286.
26. th.
27. th ed. Sage Publications Inc., 2009.