Four case studies, six years later: Developing system thinking skills in junior high school and sustaining them over time

Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Volumn 47, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 1253-1280

  Ben Zvi Assaraf, Orit ^a   Orion, Nir ^b  

^a BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

^b WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

Author keywords

earth sciences; environmental education; system approach; system thinking

Indexed keywords

CONCEPT MAPS; ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION; HYDRO-SYSTEM; JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS; LEARNING EXPERIENCES; LEARNING PATTERNS; LEARNING PROGRAMS; MATERIAL-BASED; MENTAL MODEL; METACOGNITIVES; REPERTORY GRIDS; RESEARCH TOOLS; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEWS; SYSTEM APPROACH; SYSTEM MODELS; SYSTEM THINKING; THINKING SKILLS; WATER CYCLE;

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; CURRICULA; EARTH SCIENCES; STUDENTS;

EDUCATION COMPUTING;

EID: 78649699948     PISSN: 00224308     EISSN: 10982736     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tea.20383     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Azevedo, R., Moos, D.C., Greene, J.A., Winters, F.I., &, Cromley, J.C., (2008). Why is externally-regulated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia? Educational Technology Research and Development, 56, 45-72.
2. Bencze, L., Bowen, G.M., &, Alsop, S., (2006). Teachers' tendencies to promote student-led science projects: Associations with their views about science. Science Education, 90, 400-419.
3. Ben-Zvi Assaraf, O., &, Orion, N., (2005). Development of system thinking skills in the context of earth systems education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 518-560.
4. Ben-Zvi Assaraf, O., &, Orion, N., (2009). A design-based research of an earth systems-based environmental curriculum. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 5, 197-214.
5. Ben-Zvi Assaraf, O., &, Orion, N., (in press). How Can Elementary School Students Deal with Complex Systems? Journal of Research in Science Teaching.
6. Bezzi, A., (1999). What is this thing called geoscience? Epistemological dimensions elicited with the repertory grid and their implications for scientific literacy. Science Education, 83, 675-700.
7. Booth Sweeny, L., (2000). Bathtub dynamics: Initial results of a systems thinking inventory. Web mail: http://web.mit.edu/jsterman/www/bathtub.pdf.
8. Booth-Sweeney, L., &, Sterman, J.D., (2007). Thinking about systems: Student and teacher conceptions of natural and social systems. System Dynamics Review, 23, 285-312.
9. Chi, M., (2005). Commonsense conceptions of emergent processes: Why some misconceptions are robust. Journal of Learning Sciences, 14, 161-199.
10. Coffield, F.J., Moseley, D.V., Hall, E., &, Ecclestone, K., (2004) Learning styles for post 16 learners: What do we know? Technical report, Learning and Skills Research Centre/University of Newcastle upon Tyne, London.
11. Dove, J.E., Everett, L.A., &, Preece, P.F.W., (1999). Exploring a hydrological concept through children's drawing. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 485-497.
12. Duncan, R.G., &, Reiser, B.J., (2007). Reasoning across ontologically distinct levels: Students' understandings of molecular genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 938-959.
13. Evagorou, M., Korfiatis, K., Nicolaou, C., &, Constantinou, C., (2009). An investigation of the potential of interactive simulations for developing system thinking skills in elementary school: A case study with fifth-graders and sixth-graders. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 655-674.
14. Felder, R.M., &, Silverman, L.K., (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78, 674-681.
15. Frank, M., (2000). Engineering systems thinking and systems thinking. Systems Engineering, 3, 63-168.
16. Goldstone, R.L., &, Wilensky, U., (2008). Promoting transfer by grounding complex systems principles. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17, 465-516.
17. Hawk, T.F., &, Shah, A.J., (2007). Using learning style instruments to enhance student learning. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 5, 1-19.
18. Hmelo-Silver, C., &, Azevedo, R., (2006). Understanding complex systems: Some core challenges. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 53-61.
19. Hmelo-Silver, C.E., Holton, D.L., &, Kolodner, J.L., (2000). Designing learning about complex systems. The Journal of the Learning Science, 9, 247-298.
20. Hmelo-Silver, C.E., Marathe, S., &, Liu, L., (2007). Fish swim, rocks sit, and lungs breathe: Expert-novice understanding of complex systems. The Journal of the Learning Science, 16, 307-331.
21. Hmelo-Silver, C.E., &, Pfeffer, M.G., (2004). Comparing expert and novice understanding of a complex system from the perspective of structures, behaviors, and functions. Cognitive Science, 28, 127-138.
22. Jacobson, M.J., &, Wilensky, U., (2006). Complex systems in education: Scientific and educational importance and implications for the learning sciences. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 11-34.
23. Kali, Y., Orion, N., &, Eylon, B., (2003). The effect of knowledge integration activities on students' perception of the earth's crust as a cyclic system. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 545-565.
24. Kelly, G., (1955). The psychology of personal constructs (Vol. I.). New York: W.W. Norton and Co., Inc.
25. Kim, D.H., (1999) Introduction to system thinking. In System Thinking Tools and Applications. Pegasus Communications, Inc.
26. Knipples, M.C.P.J., (2002). Coping with the abstract and complex nature of genetics in biology education: The yo-yo teaching and learning strategy (thesis). Universiteit Utrecht: Netherlands.
27. Latta, G.F., &, Swigger, K., (1992). Validation of the repertory grid for use in modeling knowledge. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43, 115-129.
28. LeCompte, M., &, Goetz, J., (1982). Problems of reliability and validity in ethnographic research. Review of Educational Research, 52, 31-60.
29. Lesh, R., (2006). Modeling students modeling abilities: The teaching and learning of complex systems in education. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15 (1), 45-52.
30. Liu, L., &, Hmelo-Silver, C.E., (2009). Promoting complex systems learning through the use of conceptual representations in hypermedia. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 1024-1040.
31. Mandinach, E.B., (1989). Model-building and the use of computer simulation of dynamic systems. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5, 221-243.
32. Martin, B.L., Mintzes, J.J., &, Clavijo, I.E., (2000). Restructuring knowledge in biology: Cognitive processes and metacognitive reflections. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 303-323.
33. Mason, C.L., (1992). Concept mapping: A tool to develop reflective science instruction. Science Education, 76, 51-63.
34. Méheut, M., &, Psillos, D., (2004). Teaching-learning sequences. Aims and tools for science education. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 515-535.
35. Nicholls, G., (2005). New lecturers' constructions of learning, teaching and research in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 30 (5), 611-625.
36. Novak, J., &, Gowin, D.B., (1984). Learning how to learn New York: Cambridge University Press.
37. Orion, N., (2002). An earth systems curriculum development model. In, Mayer V.J., (Ed.), Global science literacy (pp. 159-168). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
38. Orion, N., &, Ault, C., (2007). Learning earth sciences. In, S. Abell, &, N. Lederman, (Eds.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 653-688). USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
39. Osborn, J., &, Collins, J., (2001). Pupils' views of the role and value of the science curriculum: A Focus-Group Study. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 441-467.
40. Osborne, J.F., Ratcliffe, M., Collins, S., Millar, R., &, Duschl, R., (2003). What 'ideas-about-science' should be taught in school science? A Delphi Study of the 'Expert' Community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 692-720.
41. Ossimitz, G., (2000) Teaching system dynamics and systems thinking in Austria and Germany. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Bergen, Norway.
42. Özmen, H., Demirciolu, G., &, Coll, R.K., (2009). A comparative study of the effects of a concept mapping enhanced laboratory experience on Turkish high school students' understanding of acid-base chemistry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7, 1-24.
43. Penner, D., (2000). Explaining systems: Investigating middle school students' understanding of emergent phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 784-806.
44. Reiss, M., &, Tunnicliffe, S., (2001). Students' understandings of human organs and organ systems. Research in Science Education, 31, 383-399.
45. Rennie, L., &, Jarvis, T., (1995). Children's choice of drawings to communicate their ideas about technology. Research in Science Education, 25, 239-252.
46. Riess, W., &, Mischo, C., (2009). Promoting systems thinking through biology lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 1-21.
47. Roth, W.M., (1994). Students views of collaborative concept mapping: An emancipator research project. Science Education, 78, 1-34.
48. Schlesinger, W.H., (1991). Biogeochemistry: An analysis of global change. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
49. She, H.C., &, Liao, Y.W., (in press). Bridging scientific reasoning and conceptual change through adaptive web-based learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching.
50. Sungur, S., &, Tekkaya, C., (2003). Students' achievement in human circulatory system unit: The effect of reasoning ability and gender. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12, 59-64.
51. Tran, L., (2009). Children and adults' understanding of ocean and climate sciences. Paper prepared for the Committee for the Review of the NOAA Education Program. Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/bose/NOAA-Education- Review-Homepage.html.
52. Verhoeff, R.P., Waarlo, A.J., &, Boersma, K.T., (2008). Systems modeling and the development of coherent understanding of cell biology. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 543-568.
53. White, R., &, Gunstone, R., (1992). Probing understanding. London: Palmer Press.
54. Wilensky, U., &, Reisman, K., (2006). Thinking like a wolf, a sheep or a firefly: Learning biology through constructing and testing computational theories - An embodied modeling approach. Cognition and Instruction, 24, 171-209.
55. Wilensky, U., &, Resnick, M., (1999). Thinking in levels: A dynamic systems approach to making sense of the world. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8, 3-19.
56. Wu, H.K., (2010). Modelling a complex system: Using novice-expert analysis for developing an effective technology-enhanced learning environment. International Journal of Science Education, 32 (2), 195-219.
57. Yoon, S., (2008). Using memes and memetic processes to explain social and conceptual influences on student understanding about complex socio-scientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 900-921.