QTL for the species-specific male and female genital morphologies in Ohomopterus ground beetles

Molecular Ecology

Volumn 19, Issue 23, 2010, Pages 5231-5239

  Sasabe, Masataka ^a   Takami, Yasuoki ^b   Sota, Teiji ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b KOBE UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Carabus; genetic linkage map; hybridization; QTL; sexual selection; speciation

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

AMPLIFIED FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BEETLE; CHROMOSOME MAP; DNA SEQUENCE; FEMALE; GENETICS; GENITAL SYSTEM; GENOTYPE; HISTOLOGY; MALE; PHENOTYPE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

AMPLIFIED FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM ANALYSIS; ANIMALS; BEETLES; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; FEMALE; GENITALIA; GENOTYPE; MALE; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; PHENOTYPE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

ANIMALIA; CARABIDAE; CARABUS IWAWAKIANUS; CARABUS MAIYASANUS; COLEOPTERA; OHOMOPTERUS;

EID: 78649610260     PISSN: 09621083     EISSN: 1365294X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04883.x     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Arnqvist G, (1998) Comparative evidence for the evolution of genitalia by sexual selection. Nature, 393, 784-786.
2. Arnqvist G, Danielsson I, (1999) Copulatory courtship, genital morphology and male fertilization success in water striders. Evolution, 53, 147-156. (Pubitemid 29300666)
3. Arnqvist G, Rowe L, (2002a) Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects. Nature, 415, 787-789.
4. Arnqvist G, Rowe L, (2002b) Correlated evolution of male and female morphologies in water striders. Evolution, 56, 936-947.
5. Arnqvist G, Rowe L, (2005) Sexual Conflict. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
6. Arnqvist G, Thornhill R, (1998) Evolution of animal genitalia: patterns of phenotypic and genotypic variation and condition dependence of genital and non-genital morphology in water strider (Heteroptera: Gerridae: Insecta). Genetics Research, 71, 193-212.
7. Beavis WD, (1998) QTL analysis: power, precision, and accuracy. In: Molecular Dessection of Complex Traits (ed, Paterson AH,), pp. 145-162. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
8. Beeman RW, Brown SJ, (1999) RAPD-based genetic linkage maps of Tribolium castaneum. Genetics, 153, 333-338.
9. Bier K, Müller W, (1969) DNA-Messungen bei Insekten und eine Hypothese über retardierte Evolution und besonderen DNA-Reichtum in Tierreich. Biologisches Zentralblatt, 88, 425-449.
10. Brennan PLR, Prum RO, McCracken KG, Sorenson MD, Wilson RE, Birkhead TR, (2007) Coevolution of male and female genital morphology in waterfowl. PLoS ONE, 5, e118.
11. Brennan PLR, Clark CJ, Prum RO, (2010) Explosive eversion and functional morphology of the duck penis supports sexual conflict in waterfowl genitalia. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 277, 1309-1314.
12. Churchill GA, Doerge RW, (1994) Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics, 138, 963-971.
13. Danielsson I, Askenmo C, (1999) Male genital traits and mating interval affect male fertilization success in the water strider Gerris lacustris. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 46, 149-156.
14. Eberhard WG, (1985) Sexual Selection and Animal Genitalia. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
15. Erickson DL, Fenster CB, Stenoien HK, Price D, (2004) Quantitative trait locus analyses and the study of evolutionary process. Molecular Ecology, 13, 2505-2522.
16. Gavrilets S, (2000) Rapid evolution of reproductive isolation driven by sexual conflict. Nature, 403, 886-889.
17. Glenn TC, Schable NA, (2005) Isolating microsatellite DNA loci. Methods in Enzymology, 395, 202-222.
18. Hayashi TI, Vose M, Gavrilets S, (2007) Genetic differentiation by sexual conflict. Evolution, 61, 516-529.
19. Hosken DJ, Stockley P, (2004) Sexual selection and genital evolution. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 19, 87-93.
20. House CM, Simmons LW, (2003) Genital morphology and fertilization success in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus: an example of sexually selected male genitalia. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 270, 447-455.
21. House CM, Simmons LW, (2005) The evolution of male genitalia: patterns of genetic variation and covariation in the genital sclerites of the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 18, 1281-1292.
22. Ishikawa R, (1987) On the function of the copulatory organs of Ohomopterus (Coleoptera, Carabidae, genus Carabus). Kontyu, 55, 202-206.
23. Kosambi DD, (1944) The estimation of map distance from recombination values. Annals of Eugenics, 12, 172-175.
24. Kronforst MR, Young LG, Kapan DD, McNeely C, O'Nell RJ, Gilbert LE, (2006) Linkage of butterfly mate preference and wing color preference cue at the genomic location of wingless. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA, 103, 6575-6580.
25. Lander E, Kruglyak L, (1995) Genetic dissection of complex traits: guidelines for interpreting and reporting linkage results. Nature Genetics, 11, 241-247.
26. Lander ES, Green P, Abrahamson J, et al. (1987) MAPMAKER: an interactive computer package for constructing primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations. Genomics, 1, 174-181.
27. Liu J, Mercer JM, Stam LF, Gibson GC, Zeng Z-B, Laurie CC, (1996) Genetic analysis of a morphological shape difference in the male genitalia of Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana. Genetics, 142, 1129-1145.
28. Marcillac F, Grosjean Y, Ferveur J-F, (2005) A single mutation alters production and discrimination of Drosophila sex pheromones. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 272, 303-309.
29. Morrow EH, Arnqvist G, (2003) Costly traumatic insemination and a female counter-adaptation in bed bugs. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 270, 2377-2381.
30. Orr HA, (1998) Testing natural selection vs. genetic drift in phenotypic evolution using quantitative trait locus data. Genetics, 149, 2099-2104.
31. Orr HA, (2001) The genetics of species differences. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 16, 343-350.
32. Rieseberg LH, Widmer A, Arntz AM, Burke JM, (2002) Directional selection is the primary cause of phenotypic diversification. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA, 99, 12242-12245.
33. Rönn J, Katvala M, Arnqvist G, (2007) Coevolution between harmful male genitalia and female resistance in seed beetles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA, 104, 10921-10925.
34. De La Rúa P, Serrano J, Hewitt GM, Galian J, (1996) Physical mapping of rDNA genes in the ground beetle Carabus and related genera (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 34, 95-101.
35. Sasabe M, Takami Y, Sota T, (2007) The genetic basis of inter-specific differences in genital morphology of closely related carabid beetles. Heredity, 98, 385-391.
36. Shaw KL, Lesnick SC, (2009) Genomic linkage of male song and female acoustic preference QTL underlying a rapid species radiation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA, 106, 9737-9742.
37. Simmons LW, House CM, Hunt J, Garcia-Gonzalez F, (2009) Evolutionary response to sexual selection in male genital morphology. Current Biology, 19, 1442-1446.
38. Slate J, (2005) Quantitative trait locus mapping in natural populations: caveats and future directions. Molecular Ecology, 14, 363-379.
39. Sota T, Ishikawa R, (2004) Phylogeny and life-history evolution in Carabus (subtribe Carabina: Coleoptera, Carabidae) based on sequences of two nuclear genes. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 81, 135-149.
40. Sota T, Kubota K, (1998) Genital lock-and-key as a selective agent against hybridization. Evolution, 52, 1507-1513.
41. Sota T, Nagata N, (2008) Diversification in a fluctuating island setting: rapid radiation of Ohomopterus ground beetles in the Japanese Islands. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 363, 3377-3390.
42. Sota T, Tanabe T, (2010) Multiple speciation events in an arthropod with divergent evolution in sexual morphology. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 277, 689-696.
43. Sota T, Vogler AP, (2003) Reconstructing species phylogeny of the carabid beetles Ohomopterus using multiple nuclear DNA sequences: heterogeneous information content and the performance of simultaneous analyses. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 26, 139-154.
44. Takami Y, (2003) Experimental analysis of the effect of genital morphology on insemination success in the ground beetle Carabus insulicola (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Ethology Ecology and Evolution, 15, 51-61.
45. Takami Y, (2007) Spermatophore displacement and male fertilization success in the ground beetle Carabus insulicola. Behavioral Ecology, 18, 628-634.
46. Takami Y, Katada S, (2001) Microsatellite DNA markers for the ground beetle Carabus insulicola. Molelular Ecology Notes, 1, 128-130.
47. Takami Y, Sota T, (2007) Rapid diversification of male genitalia and mating strategies in Ohomopterus ground beetles. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 20, 1385-1395.
48. Tanabe T, Sota T, (2008) Complex copulatory behavior and the proximate effect of genital and body size differences on mechanical reproductive isolation in the millipede genus Parafontaria. The American Naturalist, 171, 692-699.
49. True JR, Liu J, Stam LF, Zeng Z-B, Laurie CC, (1997) Quantitative genetic analysis of divergence in male secondary sexual traits between Drosophila simulans and Drosophila mauritiana. Evolution, 51, 816-832.
50. Voorrips RE, (2002) MapChart: Software for the graphical presentation of linkage maps and QTLs. Journal of Heredity, 93, 77-78.
51. Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, et al. (1995) AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Research, 23, 4407-4414.
52. Wang S, Basten CJ, Zeng ZB, (2007) Windows QTL Cartographer 2.5. Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
53. Wenninger EJ, Averill AL, (2006) Influence of body and genital morphology on relative male fertilization success in oriental beetle. Behavioral Ecology, 17, 656-663.
54. Zeng Z-B, (1994) Precision mapping of quantitative trait loci. Genetics, 136, 1457-1468.
55. Zeng Z-B, Liu J, Stam LF, Kao CH, Mercer JM, Laurie CC, (2000) Genetic architecture of morphological shape difference between two Drosophila species. Genetics, 154, 299-310.