Rapid diversification of male genitalia and mating strategies in Ohomopterus ground beetles

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 1385-1395

  Takami, Y ^a   Sota, T ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Carabus; Comparative analysis; Independent contrast; Sexual selection; Sperm competition

Indexed keywords

BEETLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COPULATION; EVOLUTION; MALE; REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; SEXUAL SELECTION; SPERM COMPETITION;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BEETLE; COPULATION; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; MALE; MALE GENITAL SYSTEM; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; BEETLES; COPULATION; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENITALIA, MALE; MALE;

CARABIDAE; COLEOPTERA; OHOMOPTERUS;

EID: 34249950652     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01338.x     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Ackerly, D.D. 2000. Taxon sampling, correlated evolution, and independent contrasts. Evolution 54 : 1480 1492.
2. Alcock, J. 1994. Postinsemination associations between males and females in insects: the mate-guarding hypothesis. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 39 : 1 21.
3. Alexander, R.D., Marshall, D.C. Cooley, J.R. 1997. Evolutionary perspectives on insect mating. In : The Evolution of Mating Systems in Insects and Arachnids (J. C. Choe B. J. Crespi, eds pp. 3 31. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
4. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
5. Arnqvist, G. 1989. Sexual selection in water strider: the function, nature of selection and heritability of a male grasping apparatus. Oikos 56 : 344 350.
6. Arnqvist, G. 1998. Comparative evidence for the evolution of genitalia by sexual selection. Nature 393 : 784 786.
7. Arnqvist, G. Rowe, L. 1995. Sexual conflict and arms races between the sexes: a morphological adaptation for control of mating in a female insect. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 261 : 123 127.
8. Arnqvist, G. Rowe, L. 2002a. Correlated evolution of male and female morphologies in water striders. Evolution 56 : 936 947.
9. Arnqvist, G. Rowe, L. 2002b. Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects. Nature 415 : 787 789.
10. Arnqvist, G. Rowe, L. 2005. Sexual Conflict. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
11. Bertin, A. Fairbairn, D.J. 2005. One tool, many uses: precopulatory sexual selection on genital morphology in Aquarius remigis. J. Evol. Biol. 18 : 949 961.
12. Birkhead, T.R. Møller, A.P. 1998. Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
13. Birkhead, T.R. Pizzari, T. 2002. Postcopulatory sexual selection. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3 : 262 273.
14. Blomberg, S.P., Garland, T. Ives, A.R. 2003. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57 : 717 745.
15. Córdoba-Aguilar, A. 2002. Sensory trap as the mechanism of sexual selection in an damselfly genitalic trait (Insects: Calopterygidae). Am. Nat. 160 : 504 601.
16. Dickinson, J.L. 1997. Multiple mating, sperm competition, and cryptic female choice in the leaf beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). In : The Evolution of Mating Systems in Insects and Arachnids (J. C. Choe B. J. Crespi, eds pp. 164 183. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
17. Eberhard, W.G. 1985. Sexual Selection and Animal Genitalia. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
18. Eberhard, W.G. 1996. Female Control: Sexual Selection by Cryptic Female Choice. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
19. Eberhard, W.G. 2004. Rapid divergent evolution of sexual morphology: comparative tests of antagonistic coevolution and traditional female choice. Evolution 58 : 1947 1970.
20. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125 : 1 15.
21. Gage, M.J.G., Parker, G.A., Nylin, S. Wiklund, C. 2002. Sexual selection and speciation in mammals, butterflies and spiders, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269 : 2309 2316.
22. Garland, T., Harvey, P.H. Ives, A.R. 1992. Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Syst. Biol. 41 : 18 32.
23. Gomendio, M., Martin-Coello, J., Crespo, C., Magaña, C. Roldan, E.R.S. 2006. Sperm competition enhances functional capacity of mammalian spermatozoa. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103 : 15113 15117.
24. Harvey, P.H. Pagel, M.D. 1991. The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
25. Hosken, D.J. Stockley, P. 2004. Sexual selection and genital evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19 : 87 93.
26. Hosken, D.J., Jones, K.E., Chipperfield, K. Dixson, A. 2001. Is the bat os penis sexually selected Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 50 : 450 460.
27. Ishikawa, R. 1987. On the function of copulatory organs of Ohomopterus (Coleoptera, Carabidae, genus Carabus). Kontyû (Tokyo) 55 : 202 206.
28. Ishikawa, R. 1991. The Evolution of Carabus: Divergence and Isolating Mechanisms. Yasaka Shobo, Tokyo (in Japanese).
29. Ishikawa, R. Kubota, K. 1994. Geographical races of Carabus maiyasanus Bates and C. arrowianus (Breuning) in Honshu, Japan: a tentative revision (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Bull. Biogeogr. Soc. Jpn 49 : 105 128.
30. Klingenberg, C.P. 1996. Multivariate allometry. In : Advances in Morphometrics (L. F. Marcus, M. Corti, A. Loy, G. J. P. Naylor D. E. Slice, eds pp. 23 49. Plenum, New York.
31. Larivière, S. Ferguson, S.H. 2002. On the evolution of the mammalian baculum: vaginal friction, prolonged intromission or induced ovulation Mamm. Rev. 32 : 283 294.
32. Laurin, M. 2004. The evolution of body size, Cope's rule and the origin of Amniotes. Syst. Biol. 53 : 594 622.
33. Maddison, W.P. Maddison, D.R. 2004. Mesquite: A modular System for Evolutionary Analysis, version 1.05. http://mesquiteproject.org.
34. Maddison, W.P. Slatkin, M. 1991. Null models for the number of evolutionary steps in a character on a phylogenetic tree. Evolution 45 : 1184 1197.
35. Martins, E.P. Garland, T. 1991. Phylogenetic analyses of the correlated evolution of continuous characters: a simulation study. Evolution 45 : 534 557.
36. Midford, P.E., Garland, T. Maddison, W.P. 2003. PDAP Package. http://mesquiteproject.org/pdap_mesquite.
37. Parker, G.A. 1970. Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biol. Rev. 45 : 525 567.
38. Parker, G.A. 1974. Courtship persistence and female-guarding as male time investment strategies. Behaviour 48 : 157 184.
39. Parker, G.A. 1984. Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating strategies. In : Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems (R. L. Smith, ed pp. 2 60. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
40. Posada, D. Crandall, K.A. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14 : 817 818.
41. Rodríguez, V., Windsor, D.M. Eberhard, W.G. 2004. Tortoise beetle genitalia and demonstrations of a sexually selected advantage for flagellum length in Chelymorpha alternans (Chrysomelidae, Cassidini, Stolaini). In : New Developments in the Biology of Chrysomelidae (P. Jolivet, J. A. Santiago-Blay M. Schmitt, eds pp. 739 748. Academic Publishing bv, The Hague.
42. Rowe, L. Arnqvist, G. 2002. Sexually antagonistic coevolution in a mating system: combining experimental and comparative approaches to address evolutionary processes. Evolution 56 : 754 767.
43. SAS Institute Inc. 2004. JMP version 5, release 5.1.2. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
44. Shuster, S.M. Wade, M.J. 2003. Mating Systems and Strategies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
45. Simmons, L.W. 2001. Sperm Competition and Its Evolutionary Consequences in the Insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
46. Sota, T. 1985. Activity patterns, diets and interspecific interactions of coexisting spring and autumn breeding carabids: Carabus yaconinus and Leptocarabus kumagaii (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Ecol. Entomol. 10 : 315 324.
47. Sota, T. 2002. Radiation and reticulation: extensive introgressive hybridization in the carabid beetles Ohomopterus inferred from mitochondrial gene genealogy. Popul. Ecol. 44 : 145 156.
48. Sota, T. Ishikawa, R. 2004. Phylogeny and life-history evolution in Carabus (subtribe Carabina: Coleoptera, Carabidae) based on sequences of two nuclear genes. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 81 : 135 149.
49. Sota, T. Vogler, A.P. 2001. Incongruence of mitochondrial and nuclear gene trees in the carabid beetles Ohomopterus. Syst. Biol. 50 : 39 59.
50. Sota, T. Vogler, A.P. 2003. Reconstructing species phylogeny of the carabid beetles Ohomopterus using multiple nuclear DNA sequences: heterogeneous information content and the performance of simultaneous analysis. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 26 : 139 154.
51. Stockley, P. 2002. Sperm competition risk and male genital anatomy: comparative evidence for reduced duration of female sexual receptivity in primates with penile spines. Evol. Ecol. 16 : 123 137.
52. Su, Z.H., Tominaga, O., Ohama, T., Kajiwara, E., Ishikawa, R., Okada, T.S., Nakamura, K. Osawa, S. 1996. Parallel evolution in radiation of Ohomopterus ground beetles inferred from mitochondrial ND5 sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 43 : 662 674.
53. Swofford, D.L. 2002. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis using Parsimony (*and Other Methods), Version 4.10b. Sinauer Associations, Sunderland.
54. Takami, Y. 2000a. Phylogeny of the subgenus Ohomopterus (Coleoptera, Carabidae, genus Carabus): a morphological aspect. Tokyo Metropol. Univ. Bull. Nat. Hist. 4 : 1 32.
55. Takami, Y. 2000b. Evolution of genitalia and speciation in Carabus (Coleoptera: Carabidae) with special reference to the subgenus Ohomopterus. PhD thesis, in Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo.
56. Takami, Y. 2002. Mating behavior, insemination and sperm transfer in the ground beetle Carabus insulicola. Zool. Sci. 19 : 1067 1073.
57. Takami, Y. 2003. Experimental analysis of the effect of genital morphology on insemination success in the ground beetle Carabus insulicola (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 15 : 51 61.
58. Takami, Y. 2007. Spermatophore displacement and male fertilization success in the ground beetle Carabus insulicola. Behav. Ecol. in press.
59. Waage, J.K. 1979. Dual function of the damselfly penis: sperm removal and transfer. Science 203 : 916 918.
60. Waage, J.K. 1986. Evidence for widespread sperm displacement ability among Zygoptera (Odonata) and the means for predicting its presence. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 28 : 285 300.
61. Yamamura, N. 1986. An evolutionary stable strategy (ESS) model of postcopulatory guarding in insects. Theor. Popul. Biol. 29 : 438 455.
62. Yamamura, N. Tsuji, N. 1989. Post-copulatory guarding strategy in a finite mating period. Theor. Popul. Biol. 35 : 36 50.