Complex copulatory behavior and the proximate effect of genital and body size differences on mechanical reproductive isolation in the millipede genus Parafontaria

American Naturalist

Volumn 171, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 692-699

  Tanabe, Tsutomu ^a   Sota, Teiji ^b  

^a KUMAMOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Diplopoda; Genitalia; Mate recognition; Mating behavior; Mechanical isolation

Indexed keywords

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; PRIMER DNA;

ARTHROPOD; BODY SIZE; COPULATION; MATE RECOGNITION; MORPHOLOGY; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SPERM; SYMPATRY;

ANIMAL; ARTHROPOD; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DNA SEQUENCE; FEMALE; GENETICS; GENITAL SYSTEM; HISTOLOGY; JAPAN; MALE; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION GENETICS; REPRODUCTION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION;

ANIMALS; ARTHROPODS; BASE SEQUENCE; DNA PRIMERS; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; FEMALE; GENETIC SPECIATION; GENETICS, POPULATION; GENITALIA; JAPAN; MALE; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; REPRODUCTION; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

DIPLOPODA; PARAFONTARIA;

EID: 42549141319     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/587075     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Arnqvist, G., and L. Rowe. 2005. Sexual conflict. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
2. Coyne, J. A. 1993. The genetics of an isolating mechanism between two sibling species of Drosophila. Evolution 47:778-788.
3. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 2004. Speciation. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
4. De Wilde, J. 1964. Reproduction. Pages 9-58 in M. Rockstein, ed. The physiology of Insecta. Vol. 1. 1st ed. Academic Press, New York.
5. Dufour, L. 1844. Anatomie générale des Dipterès. Annales des Sciences Naturelles Zoologie et Biologie Animale 1:244-264.
6. Eberhard, W. G. 1985. Sexual selection and animal genitalia. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
7. _. 1992. Species isolation, genital mechanics, and the evolution of species-specific genitalia in three species of Macrodactylus beetles (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Melolonthinae). Evolution 46:1774-1783.
8. Haacker, U., and S. Fuchs. 1970. Das Paarungsveerhalten von Cylindroiulus punctus Leach. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 27:641-648.
9. Hoffman, R. L. 1978. The taxonomic and nomenclatorial status of the milliped generic names Parafontaria Verhoeff, Cyphonaria Verhoeff, and Japonaria Attems (Polydesmida, Xystodesmidae). Spixiana 1:215-224.
10. Hosken, D. J., and P. Stockley. 2004. Sexual selection and genital evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 19:87-93.
11. Ryan, M. J., and A. S. Rand. 1993. Species recognition and sexual selection as a unitary problem in animal communication. Evolution 47:647-657.
12. Schneider, S., R. Roessli, and L. Excoffier. 2000. Arlequin, version 2000. University of Geneva, Geneva.
13. Shapiro, A. M., and A. H. Porter. 1989. The lock-and-key hypothesis: evolutionary and biosystematic interpretation of insect genitalia. Annual Review of Entomology 34:231-245.
14. Sota, T., and K. Kubota. 1998. Genital lock-and-key as a selective agent against hybridization. Evolution 52:1507-1513.
15. Tanabe, T. 2002. Revision of the millipede genus Parafontaria Verhoeff, 1936 (Diplopoda, Xystodesmidae). Journal of Natural History 36:2139-2183.
16. Tanabe, T., H. Katakura, and S. F. Mawatari. 2001. Morphological difference and reproductive isolation: morphometrics in the millipede Parafontaria tonominea and its allied forms. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 72:249-264.