Genetic differentiation by sexual conflict

Evolution

Volumn 61, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 516-529

  Hayashi, Takehiko I ^a   Vose, Michael ^b   Gavrilets, Sergey ^b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AIST   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

Diploid; Genetic divergence; Mathematical models; Mating rate; Multilocus; Polymorphism; Sympatric speciation

Indexed keywords

DIVERGENCE; GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; NUMERICAL MODEL; POLYMORPHISM; SEXUAL CONFLICT; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY); SYMPATRY;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; FEMALE; GENETIC SELECTION; HAPLOTYPE; MALE; PHENOTYPE; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION;

ANIMALS; FEMALE; GENETIC SPECIATION; HAPLOTYPES; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE; SELECTION (GENETICS); SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

EID: 34247485014     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00059.x     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Arnegard, M. E., and A. S. Kondrashov. 2004. Sympatric speciation by sexual selection alone is unlikely. Evolution 58:222-237.
2. Arnqvist, G., and T. Nilsson. 2000. The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Anim. Behav. 60:145-164.
3. Arnqvist, G., and L. Rowe. 2002. Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects. Nature 415:787-789.
4. -. 2005. Sexual conflict. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
5. Bergsten, J., A. Töyrä, and A. N. Nilsson. 2001. Intraspecific variation and intersexual correlation in secondary sexual characters of three diving beetles (coleptera: Dytiscidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 73:221-232.
6. Brooks, R., and J. A. Endler. 2001. Female guppies agree to differ: phenotypic and genetic variation in mate-choice behavior and the consequences for sexual selection. Evolution 55:1644-1655.
7. Chapman, T., G. Arnqvist, J. Bangham, and L. Rowe. 2003. Sexual conflict. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18:41-47.
8. Clement, M., D. Posada, and K. Crandall. 2000. TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol. Ecol. 9:1657-1660.
9. Crow, J.F. and M. Kimura. 1970. An introduction to population genetic theory. Harper and Row, New York.
10. Frank, S. A. 2000. Sperm competition and female avoidance of polyspermy mediated by sperm-egg biochemistry. Evol. Ecol. Res. 2:613-625.
11. Galindo, B. E., G. W. Moy, W. J. Swanson, and V. D. Vacquier. 2002. Full-length sequence of VERL, the egg vitelline envelope receptor for abalone sperm lysin. Gene 288:111-117.
12. Gavrilets, S. 2000. Rapid evolution of reproductive isolation driven by sexual conflict. Nature 403:886-889.
13. -. 2004. Fitness landscapes and the origin of species. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
14. Gavrilets, S., and T. I. Hayashi. 2005. Speciation and sexual conflict. Evol. Ecol. 19:167-198.
15. -. 2006. The dynamics of two- and three-way sexual conflicts over mating. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 361:345-354.
16. Gavrilets, S., and D. Waxman. 2002. Sympatric speciation by sexual conflict. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:10533-10538.
17. Gavrilets, S., G. Arnqvist, and U. Friberg. 2001. The evolution of female mate choice by sexual conflict. Proc. R. Soc. B 268:531-539.
18. Haygood, R. 2004. Sexual conflict and protein polymorphism. Evolution 58:1414-1423.
19. Holland, B., andW. R. Rice. 1998. Chase-away sexual selection: antagonistic seduction versus resistance. Evolution 52:1-7.
20. -. 1999. Experimental removal of sexual selection reverses intersexual antagonistic coevolution and removes a reproductive load. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:5083-5088.
21. Howard, D. J., M. Reece, P. G. Gregory, J. Chu, and M. L. Cain. 1998. The evolution of barriers to fertilization between closely related organisms. Pp. 279-288, in D. J. Howard and S. H. Berlocher, eds. Endless forms: species and speciation. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
22. Huber, B. A., and A. P. González. 2001. Female genital dimorphism in a spider (Araneae: Pholcidae). J. Zool. 255:301-304.
23. Jennions, M. D., and M. Petrie. 1997. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biol. Rev. 72:283-327.
24. Kodric-Brown, A., and P. F. Nicolette. 1996. Consensus among females in their choice of males in the guppy Poecilia reticulata. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 39:395-400.
25. Kotiaho, J. S., L. W. Simons, and J. L. Tomkins. 2001. Towards a resolution of the lek paradox. Nature 410:684-686.
26. Lande, R. 1981. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic characters. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78:3721-3725.
27. Maklakov, A. A., T. Bilde, and Y. Lubin. 2005. Sexual conflict in the wild: Elevated mating rate reduces female lifetime reproductive success. Am. Nat. 165:S38-S45.
28. Martin, O., and D. Hosken. 2003. The evolution of reproductive isolation through sexual conflict. Nature 423:979-982.
29. Morris, M. R., P. F. Nicoletto, and E. Hesselman. 2003. A polymorphism in female preference for a polymorphic male trait in the swordtail fish Xiphophorus cortezi. Anim. Behav. 65:45-52.
30. Nei, M., T. Maruyama, and C.-I. Wu. 1983. Models of evolution of reproductive isolation. Genetics 103:557-579.
31. Parker, G. A. 1979. Sexual selection and sexual conflict. Pp. 123-166, in M. S. Blum and N. A. Blum, eds. Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects. Academic Press, New York.
32. -. 2006. Sexual conflict over mating and fertilization: an overview. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 361:235-259.
33. Pitnick, S., W. D. Brown, and G.T. Miller. 2001a. Evolution of female remating behavior following experimental removal of sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. B 268:557-563.
34. Pitnick, S., G. T. Miller, J. Reagan, and B. Holland. 2001b. Males' evolutionary responses to experimental removal of sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. B 268:1071-1080.
35. Pizzari, T., and R. R. Snook. 2003. Perspective: sexual conflict and sexual selection: chasing away paradigm shifts. Evolution 57:1223-1236.
36. Pomiankowski, A., and Y. Iwasa. 1991. The evolution of costly mate preferences I. Fisher and biased mutation. Evolution 45:1422-1430.
37. Pomiankowski, A., and A. P. Moller. 1995. A resolution of the lek paradox. Proc. R. Soc. B 260:21-29.
38. Rice, W. R. 1996. Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature 381:232-234.
39. -. 1998. Intergenomic conflict, interlocus antagonistic coevolution, and the evolution of reproductive isolation. Pp. 261-270, in D. J. Howard and S. H. Berlocher, eds. Endless forms: species and speciation. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
40. Rice, W. R., and B. Holland. 1997. The enemies within: intergenomic conflict, interlocus contest evolution (ICE), and intraspecific Red Queen. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 41:1-10.
41. Ritchie, M. G., and S. D. F. Phillips. 1998. The genetics of sexual isolation. Pp. 291-308, in D. J. Howard and S. H. Berlocher, eds. Endless forms: species and speciation. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
42. Rowe, L., and D. Houle. 1996. The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits. Proc. R. Soc. B 263:1415-1421.
43. Rowe, L., E. Cameron, and T. Day. 2003. Detecting sexually antagonistic coevolution with population crosses. Proc. R. Soc. B 270:2009-2016.
44. -. 2005. Escalation, retreat, and female indifference as alternative outcomes of sexually antagonistic coevolution. Am. Nat. 165:S5-S18.
45. Sota T., F. Kusumoto, and K. Kubota. 2000. Consequences of hybridization between Ohomopterus insulicola and O. arrowianus (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in a segmented river basin: parallel formation of hybrid swarms. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 71:297-313.
46. Svensson, E. L., J. Abbot, and R. Hardling. 2005. Female polymorphism, frequency dependence, and rapid evolutionary dynamics in natural populations. Am. Nat. 165:567-576.
47. Swanson, W. J., and V. D. Vacquier. 2002. The rapid evolution of reproductive proteins. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3:137-144.
48. Swanson, W. J., C. F. Aquadro, and V. D. Vacquier. 2001. Polymorphism in abalone fertilization proteins is consistent with the neutral evolution of the egg's receptor for lysin (VERL) and positive Darwinian selection of sperm lysin. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:376-383.
49. Templeton, A. R., K. A. Crandall, and C. F. Sing. 1992. A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping and DNA sequence data. Genetics 132:619-633.
50. Terai Y., W. E. Mayer, J. Kelin, H. Tichy, and N. Okada. 2002. The effect of selection on a long wavelength-sensitive (LWS) opsin gene of lake victoria cichlid fishes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:15501-15506.
51. Wagner, W. E. J., A. M. Murray, and W. H. Cade. 1995. Phenotypic variation in the mating preferences of female field crickets, Gryllusinteger. Anim. Behav. 49:1269-1281.