The genetic basis of interspecific differences in genital morphology of closely related carabid beetles

Heredity

Volumn 98, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 385-391

  Sasabe, M ^a   Takami, Y ^a   Sota, T ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Carabus; Hybridization; Polygenic inheritance; Quantitative genetics; Response to selection; Speciation

Indexed keywords

BEETLE; FERTILIZATION (REPRODUCTION); GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; HERITABILITY; INTERSPECIFIC VARIATION; MORPHOLOGY; SEXUAL SELECTION;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BEETLE; CHIMERA; CROSS BREEDING; FEMALE; GENETICS; GENITAL SYSTEM; HISTOLOGY; MALE; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION;

ANIMALS; BEETLES; CHIMERA; CROSSES, GENETIC; FEMALE; GENETIC SPECIATION; GENITALIA; MALE; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

ANIMALIA; CARABIDAE; COLEOPTERA; OHOMOPTERUS;

EID: 34249071072     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: 13652540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800952     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Albertson RC, Streelman JT, Kocher TD (2003). Genetic basis of adaptive shape differences in the cichlid head. J Heredity 94: 291-301.
2. Arnqvist G (1989). Sexual selection in a water strider: the function, mechanism of selection and heritability of a male grasping apparatus. Oikos 56: 344-350.
3. Arnqvist G (1998). Comparative evidence for the evolution of genitalia by sexual selection. Nature 393: 784-786.
4. Arnqvist G, Danielsson I (1999). Copulatory courtship, genital morphology and male fertilization success in water striders. Evolution 53: 147-156.
5. Danielsson I, Askenmo C (1999). Male genital traits and mating interval affect male fertilization success in the water strider Gerris lacustris. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 46: 149-156.
6. Eberhard WG (1985). Sexual Selection and Animal Genitalia. Harvard University Press: Cambridge.
7. Erickson DL, Fenster CB, Stenoien HK, Price D (2004). Quantitative trait locus analyses and the study of evolutionary process. Mol Ecol 13: 2505-2522.
8. Hatfield T (1997). Genetic divergence in adaptive characters between sympatric species of stickleback. Am Nat 149: 1009-1029.
9. Hawthorne DJ, Via S (2001). Genetic linkage of ecological specialization and reproductive isolation in pea aphids. Nature 412: 904-907.
10. Hosken DJ, Stockley P (2004). Sexual selection and genital evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 19: 87-93.
11. House CM, Simmons LW (2003). Genital morphology and fertilization success in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus: an example of sexually selected male genitalia. Proc R Soc Lond B 270: 447-455.
12. House CM, Simmons LW (2005). The evolution of male genitalia: patterns of genetic variation and covariation in the genital sclerites of the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus. J Evol Biol 18: 1281-1292.
13. Huttunen S, Aspi J (2003). Complex inheritance of male courtship song characters in Drosophila virilis. Behav Gen 33: 17-24.
14. Ishikawa R (1987). On the function of the copulatory organs of Ohomopterus (Coleoptera, Carabidae, genus Carabus). Kontyu 55: 202-206.
15. Ishikawa R (1991). The evolution of Carabus (in Japanese). Yasaka-shobo: Tokyo.
16. Jagadeeshan S, Singh RS (2006). A time-sequence functional analysis of mating behaviour and genital coupling in Drosophila: role of cryptic female choice and male sex-drive in the evolution of male genitalia. J Evol Biol 19: 1058-1070.
17. Kronforst MR, Young LG, Kapan DD, McNeely C, O'Neill RJ, Gilbert LE (2006). Linkage of butterfly mate preference and wing color preference cue at genomic location of wingless. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 6575-6580.
18. Lande R (1981). The minimum number of genes contributing to quantitative variation between and within populations. Genetics 99: 541-553.
19. Liu J, Mercer JM, Stam LF, Gibson GC, Zeng Z-B, Laurie CC (1996). Genetic analysis of a morphological shape difference in the male genitalia of Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana. Genetics 142: 1129-1145.
20. Lynch M, Walsh B (1998). Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, MA.
21. Mather K, Jinks JL (1982). Biometrical Genetics. The Study of Continuous Variation, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
22. Otto SP, Jones CD (2000). Detecting the undetected: estimating the total number of loci underlying a quantitative trait. Genetics 156: 2093-2107.
23. Parsons YM, Shaw KL (2002). Mapping unexplored genomes: A genetic linkage map of the Hawaiian cricket Laupala. Genetics 162: 1275-1282.
24. Saldamando CI, Miyaguchi S, Tatsuta H, Kishino H, Bridle JR, Butlin RK (2005). Inheritance of song and stridulatory peg number divergence between Chorthippus brunneus and C. jacobsi, two naturally hybridizing grasshopper species (Orthoptera: Acrididae). J Evol Biol 18: 703-712.
25. Serrano J, Galián J (1998). A review of karyotypic evolution and phylogeny of carabid beetles (Coleoptera). In: Ball GE, Casalle A, Taglianti AV (eds). Phylogeny and Classification of Caraboidea (Coleoptera: Adephaga). Museo Regionale di Scienze Naturali: Torino. pp 191-228.
26. Shaw KL (1996). Polygenic inheritance of a behavioral phenotype: interspecific genetics of song in the Hawaiian cricket genus Laupala. Evolution 50: 256-266.
27. Singh RS, Kulathinal RJ (2005). Male sex drive and the masculinization of the genome. BioEssays 27: 518-525.
28. Sota T (2002). Radiation and reticulation: extensive introgressive hybridization in the carabid beetles Ohomopterus inferred from mitochondrial gene genealogy. Popul Ecol 44: 145-156.
29. Sota T, Kubota K (1998). Genital lock-and-key as a selective agent against hybridization. Evolution 52: 1507-1513.
30. Sota T, Vogler AP (2003). Reconstructing species phylogeny of the carabid beetles Ohomopterus using multiple nuclear DNA sequences: heterogeneous information content and the performance of simultaneous analyses. Mol Phylogenet Evol 26: 139-154.
31. Takami Y (2003). Experimental analysis of the effect of genital morphology on insemination success in the ground beetle Carabus insulicola (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Ethol Ecol Evol 15: 51-61.
32. Takami Y, Sota T (in press). Rapid diversification of male genitalia and mating strategies in Ohomopterus ground beetles. J Evol Biol.
33. Wenninger EJ, Averill AL (2006). Influence of body and genital morphology on relative male fertilization success in oriental beetle. Behav Ecol 17: 656-663.
34. Westerbergh A, Doebley J (2002). Morphological traits defining species differences in wild relatives of maize are controlled by multiple quantitative trait loci. Evolution 56: 273-283.
35. Wijngaarden PJ, Brakefield PM (2000). The genetic basis of eyespot size in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana: an analysis of line crosses. Heredity 85: 471-479.
36. Zeng Z-B (1992). Correcting the bias of Wright's estimates of the number of genes affecting a quantitative character: a further improved method. Genetics 131: 987-1001.
37. Zeng Z-B, Houle D, Cockerham CC (1990). How informative is Wright's estimator of the number of genes affecting a quantitative character? Genetics 126: 235-247.
38. Zeng Z-B, Liu J, Stam LF, Kao CH, Mercer JM, Laurie CC (2000). Genetic architecture of morphological shape difference between two Drosophila species. Genetics 154: 299-310.