Research ethics and participatory research in an interdisciplinary technology-enhanced learning project

International Journal of Research and Method in Education

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 245-257

  Tracy, Frances ^a   Carmichael, Patrick ^a  

^a LIVERPOOL JOHN MOORES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Community of inquiry; Ethics; Interdisciplinary; Participatory research; Phronesis

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649429622     PISSN: 1743727X     EISSN: 17437288     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1743727X.2010.511716     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Aristotle. 2000. The Nicomachean ethics. Trans. R. Crisp. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Austin, W., C. Park, and E. Goble. 2008. From interdisciplinary to transdisciplinary research: A case study. Qualitative Health Research 18, no. 4: 557-64.
3. Barry, A., G. Born, and G. Weszkalnys. 2008. Logics of interdisciplinarity. Economy and Society 37, no. 1: 20-49.
4. Berners-Lee, T., J. Hendler, and O. Lassila. 2001. The semantic web. Scientific American Magazine, May: 34-43.
5. Boser, S. 2006. Ethics and power in community-campus partnerships for research. Action Research 4, no. 1: 9-21.
6. Brydon-Miller, M., and D. Greenwood. 2006. A re-examination of the relationship between action research and human subjects review processes. Action Research 4, no. 1: 117-28.
7. Carmichael, P. 2003. Teachers as researchers and teachers as software developers: How use-case analysis helps build better educational software. The Curriculum Journal 14, no. 1: 105-22.
8. Carmichael, P., and D. Youdell. 2007. Using virtual collaboration environments for education research: Some ethical considerations. Research Intelligence 100: 26-9.
9. Chambers, R. 1994. Participatory rural appraisal (PRA): Analysis of experience. World Development 22, no. 9: 1253-68.
10. Dogan, M., and R. Pahre. 1990. Creative marginality: Innovation at the intersection of social sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview.
11. Elliott, J. 1978. Classroom research: Science or commonsense. In Understanding classroom life, ed. R. McAleese and D. Hamilton, 12-25. Windsor: NFER.
12. Elliott, J. 2006. Educational research as a form of democratic rationality. Journal of Philosophy of Education 40, no. 2: 169-85.
13. Gottesdiener, E. 2002. Requirements through collaboration. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
14. Hakkarainen, K., T. Palonen, S. Paavola, and E. Lehtinen. 2004. Communities of networked expertise: Professional and educational perspectives. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
15. Hall, J. 1999. Cultures of inquiry: From epistemology to discourse in sociocultural research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Hawthorn, G. 1991. Plausible worlds: Possibility and understanding in history and social science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. Haythornthwaite, C. 2006. Articulating divides in distributed knowledge practice. Information, Communication & Society 9, no. 6: 761-80.
18. Hughes, G.J. 2001. Aristotle on ethics. London: Routledge.
19. Kokelmanns, J.J. 1979. Why interdisciplinarity? In Interdisciplinarity and higher education, ed. J.J. Kokelmanns, 123-60. London: Pennsylvania State University Press.
20. Muñoz, K., and L. Jeris. 2005. Learning to be interdisciplinary: An action research approach to boundary spanning. Health Education Journal 64, no. 1: 5-12.
21. Nowotny, H., P. Scott, and M. Gibbons. 2001. Rethinking science: Knowledge and the public on an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.
22. Olsson, E. 2004. What active users and designers contribute in the design process. Interacting with Computers 16: 377-401.
23. Patel, U., and N. Solomon. 2009. Conversations across research projects on simulation: Uncovering the new worlds of work, learning and technology. Paper presented at the CRLL Conference, Lifelong Learning Revisited: What Next?, June 24-26, at University of Stirling, Scotland.
24. Pollard, A. 2007. The UK's Teaching and Learning Research Programme: Findings and significance. British Educational Research Journal 33, no. 5: 639-804.
25. Rimpilainen, S., and R. Edwards. 2009. The ANTics of educational research: Researching case-based learning through objects and texts. Paper presented at CRESC Conference, September, at University of Manchester.
26. Shadbolt, N., T. Berners-Lee, and W. Hall. 2006. The semantic web revisited. IEEE Intelligent Systems 21, no. 3: 96-101.
27. Somekh, B. 1997. Classroom investigations: Exploring and evaluating how IT can support learning. In Using IT effectively in teaching and learning: Studies in pre-service and inservice teacher education, ed. B. Somekh and N. Davis, 113-26. London Routledge.
28. Somekh, B. 2001. Methodological issues is identifying and describing the way knowledge is constructed with and without information and communications technology. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education 10, nos. 1-2: 157-78.
29. Strathern, M. 2004. Commons and borderlands. Wantage: Sean Kingston.
30. Suchman, L. 2007. Human machine reconfigurations: Plans and situ\ated actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Suchman, L., J. Blomberg, J.E. Orr, and R. Trigg. 1999. Reconstructing technologies as social practice. American Behavioral Scientist 43, no. 3: 392-408.
32. Tscholl, M., F. Tracy, and P. Carmichael. 2009. Case methods, pedagogical innovation and semantic technologies. Paper presented at EC-TEL Conference, October, in Nice, France.
33. Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Wiliam, D. 2008. Comments on Bulterman-Bos: What should education research do, and how should it do it? Educational Researcher 37, no. 7: 432-8.
35. Wilson, A., S. Rimpilainen, D. Skinner, C. Cassidy, D. Christie, N. Coutts, and C. Sinclair. 2007. Using a virtual research environment to support new models of collaborative and participative research in Scottish education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education 16, no. 3: 289-304.