Teachers as researchers and teachers as software developers: How use-case analysis helps build better educational software

Curriculum Journal

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 105-122

  Carmichael, Patrick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Action research; E learning; Educational software; Metadata; Use case analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 33644801780     PISSN: 09585176     EISSN: 14693704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0958517032000055983     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Alper, J., 1998. Digital libraries: assembling the world's biggest library on your desktop. Science, 281 (5384) 18 September: 1784–1786.
2. Assessment Reform Group. 1999. Assessment for Learning: Beyond the Black Box, Cambridge: University of Cambridge School of Education: Assessment Reform Group.
3. Assessment Reform Group. 2001. “ Assessment for Learning: 10 Principles ”. In University of Cambridge School of Education: Assessment Reform Group Cambridge Online athtty://www.assessment-reform-group.org.uk/principles.html
4. Black, P., and Wiliam, D., 1998a. Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5 (1): 11–71.
5. Black, P., and Wiliam, D., 1998. Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards through Classroom Assessment, London: King's College London School of Education.
6. Black, P., and Wiliam, D., The King's-Medway-Oxford Formative Assessment Project: a theoretical framework for formative assessment?. ‘Getting Inside the Black Box: Formative Assessment in Practice’ symposium, British Educational Research Association 26th Annual Conference. September. Cardiff University.
7. Carmichael, P., Information architecture and the representation of professional knowledge. UNESCO Conference on Science for Peace and Development. October4–6, Maribor, Slovenia. Online athttp://www.reading.ac.uk/˜ems97pc/maribor2001/
8. Cockburn, A., 2000. Writing Effective Use Cases, Reading, MA: Longman Addison- Wesley.
9. Conallen, J., 2000. Building Web Applications with UML, Reading, MA: Longman Addison-Wesley.
10. Dawes, L., and Selwyn, N., 1999. Teaching with the dream machines: the representation of teachers and computers in information technology advertising. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 8 (3): 289–304.
11. Department for Education and Employment. 1997. Connecting the Learning Society, London: DFEE.
12. DFEE. 1998. Initial Teacher Training National Curriculum for the Use of ICT in Subject Teaching, London: DFEE.
13. Department for Education and Skills. 2001. ImpaCT2: Emerging Findings from the Evaluation of the Impact of Information and Communications Technologies on Pupil Attainment, London: DFES/BECTa.
14. Department for Education and Skills. 2002. Transforming the Way We Learn: A Vision for the Future in ICT in Schools, London: DFES/NGFL.
15. Elliot, J., 1991. Action Research for Educational Change, Buckingham: Open University Press.
16. Fowler, M., and Scott, K., 1999. UML Distilled: A Brief Guide to the Standard Object Modelling Language, 2nd edn, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Addison-Wesley.
17. Gottesdiener, E., 2002. Requirements by Collaboration, Boston, MA: Pearson Addison-Wesley.
18. Grundy, S., 1987. Curriculum: Product or Praxis, Lewes: Palmer.
19. Hjelm, J., 2001. Creating the Sematic Web with RDF, New York: Wiley.
20. Kemmis, S., and MacTaggart, R., 1992. The Action Research Planner, 3rd edn., Geelong, Australia: Deakin University Press.
21. McQuail, D., 2000. McQuail's Mass Communication Theory, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Nielsen, J., 2000. Designing Web Usability: The Practice of Simplicity, Indianapolis: New Riders Publishing.
23. Office for Standards in Education. 2002. ICT in Schools: Impact of Government Initiatives, London: OFSTED.
24. Rheingold, H., 2000. The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier, 2nd edn, Cambridge: MIT Press. MA and London
25. Rosenberg, D., and Scott, K., 1999. Use Case Driven Object Modelling with UML, Reading, MA: Longman Addison-Wesley.
26. Rosenfeld, L., and Morville, P., 1998. Information Architecture for the World Wide Web: Designing Large-scale Web Sites, Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly and Associates.
27. Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport. 1997. The People's Lottery, London: HMSO.
28. Siegel, D., 1996. The balkanization of the web. Web Techniques, 1 (1): 32–39.
29. Somekh, B., 1997. “ Classroom investigations: exploring and evaluating how IT can support learning ”. In Using Information Technology Effectively in Teaching and Learning: Studies in Pre-service and In- service Teacher Education, Edited by: Somekh, B., and Davies, N., 114–126. London: Routledge.
30. Somekh, B., 2001. Methodological issues in identifying and describing the way knowledge is constructed with and without information and communications technology. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 10 (1-2): 157–178.
31. Stallman, R., 2001. “ The free universal encyclopedia and learning resource ”. In Online Communities: Commerce, Community Action and the Virtual University, Edited by: Werry, C., and Mowbray, M., 257–269. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
32. Steuer, J., 1998. Tilling the soil: tools for building a web community. Web Techniques, 3 (1) January: 44–49.
33. Text Encoding Initiative. 2002. Guidelines for Electronic Text Encoding and Interchange, Edition P4, Volumes 1 and 2, Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.
34. Teacher Training Agency. 1999. NOF-Funded Training for Teachers: overview, London: TTA.
35. Williams, D., Coles, L., Richardson, A., Wilson, K., and Tuson, J., 2000. Integrating information and communications technology in professional practice: an analysis of teachers' needs based on a survey of primary and secondary teachers in Scottish schools. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9 (2): 67–182.