A re-examination of the relationship between action research and human subjects review processes

Action Research

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 117-128

  Brydon Miller, Mary ^a   Greenwood, Davydd ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

^b Cornell University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

action research; human subjects; institutional review board (IRB); research ethics

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745733409     PISSN: 14767503     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1476750306060582     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Anderson, P. V. (1996). Ethics, institutional review boards, and the involvement of human participants in composition research. In P. Mortensen & G. Kirsch (Eds.), Ethics and representation in qualitative studies of literacy(pp. 260–285). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
2. Baumrind, D. (1964). Some thoughts on ethics of research after reading Milgram's ‘Behavioral study of obedience’. American Psychologist, 19(6), 421–423.
3. Brydon-Miller, M. (2004). The terrifying truth: Interrogating systems of power and privilege and choosing to act. In M. Brydon-Miller, P. Maguire & A. McIntyre (Eds.), Traveling companions: Feminism, teaching, and action research(pp. 3–19). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
4. Fine, M., Torre, M. E., Boudin, K., Bowen, I., Clark, J., Hylton, D., Martinez, M., Rivea, M., Roberts, R. A., Smart, P., & Upegui, D. (2004). Participatory action research: From within and beyond prison bars. In L. Weis & M. Fine (Eds.), Working method: Research and social justice(pp. 95–119). New York: Routledge.
5. Haney, C., Banks, W., & Zimbardo, P. (1973). Interpersonal dynamics in a simulated prison. International Journal of Criminology and Penology, 1, 69–97.
6. Haney, C., & Zimbardo, P. (1998). The past and future of U.S. prison policy: Twentyfive years after the Stanford Prison Experiment. American Psychologist, 53(7), 709–727.
7. Hock, R. (2001). Forty studies that changed psychology: Explorations into the history of psychological research. 4th edn.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
8. Jones, J. H. (1993). Bad blood: The Tuskegee syphilis experiment(Rev. ed.). New York: Free Press.
9. Linders, A. (2005, May). The bureaucritization of ethics. Paper presented at the First International Qualitative Inquiry Conference, Urbana, Illinois.
10. Lykes, M. B. in collaboration with the Association of Maya Ixil Women –New Dawn, Chajul, Guatemala (2001). Creative arts and photography in participatory action research in Guatemala. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice(pp. 363–371). London: SAGE.
11. Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371–378.
12. Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York: Harper/Collins.
13. Newkirk, T. (1996). Seduction and betrayal in qualitative research. In P. Mortensen & G. Kirsch (Eds.), Ethics and representation in qualitative studies of literacy(pp. 3–16). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
14. Sales, B. D., & Folkman, S. (2000). Ethics in research with human subjects. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
15. Thomas, S. B., & Quinn, S. C. (1991). The Tuskegee Syphilis Study, 1932–1972: Implications for HIV education and AIDS risk programs in the Black community. American Journal of Public Health, 81(11), 1498–1505.
16. Women of ADMI, & Lykes, M. B. (2000). Voces e imagenes: Las mujeres Maya Ixiles de Chajul/Voices and images: Mayan Ixil women of Chajul. Guatemala: Magna Terra.