What collective? Collectivism and relationalism from a Chinese perspective

Chinese Journal of Communication

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 42-63

  Wang, Georgette ^a   Liu, Zhong Bo ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHENGCHI UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Collectivism; Guanxi; Individualism; Intercultural communication; Interpersonal interactions; Organizational communication; Other; Relation; Relationalism; Self

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649394613     PISSN: 17544750     EISSN: 17544769     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17544750903528799     Document Type: Article

References (114)

1. Abbott, K.A. (1970). Harmony and individualism: Changing Chinese psychosocial functioning in Taipei and San Francisco. Taipei, Taiwan: Orient Cultural Service.
2. Abrams, D., Ando, K., & Hinkle, S. (1998). Psychological attachment to the group: Crosscultural differences in organizational identification and subjective norms as predictors of workers' turnover intentions. Personality and Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1027-1039.
3. Argyle, M., Henderson, M., Bond, M., Iizuka, Y., & Contarello, A. (1986). Cross-cultural variations in relationship rules. International Journal of Psychology, 21(3), 287-315.
4. Bae, J.H., & Koo, J. (2008). Information loss, knowledge transfer cost and the value of social relations. Strategic Organization, 6(3), 227-258.
5. Barnes, S.X.D. (1998). Individualism-Collectivism and ego development: A study of the Chinese culture. Bell & Howell Information and Learning Company.
6. Benedict, R. (1946). The chrysanthemum and the sword: Patterns of Japanese culture. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
7. Bond, M.H. (1994). Into the heart of collectivism: A personal and scientific journey. In U. Kim, H.C. Trandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theories, method, and applications (pp. 66-76). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. Bond, M.H. (2002). Reclaiming the individual from Hofstede's ecological analysis: A 20-year odyssey: Comment on Oyserman et al. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 73-77.
9. Brett, J.M., Tinsley, C.H., Janssens, M., Barsness, Z.I., & Lytle, A.L. (1997). New approach to the study of culture in industry/organizational psychology. In P.C. Earley & M. Erez (Eds.), New perspectives on international industrial/organizational psychology (pp. 75-129). San Francisco: The New Lexington Press.
10. Brewer, M.B., & Chen, Y.R. (2007). Where (Who) are collectivism? Toward conceptual clarification of individualism and collectivism. Psychological Review, 114(1), 133-151.
11. Brewer, M.B., & Gardner, W. (1996). Who is this "We"? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 83-93.
12. Burleson, B.R., & Mortenson, S.R. (2003). Explaining cultural differences in evaluations of emotional support behaviors: Exploring the mediating influences of value systems and interaction goals. Communication Research, 30(2), 113-146.
13. Chen, C.L., & Easterby-Smith, M. (2008). Is guanxi still working, while ChineseMNCs go global: The case of Taiwanese MNCs in the UK. Human SystemsManagement, 27, 131-142.
14. Chen, G.M., & Chung, J. (1994). The impact of Confucianism on organizational communication. Communication Quarterly, 42(2), 93-105.
15. Chen, X.P., & Chen, C.C. (2004). On the intricacies of the Chinese guanxi: A process model of guanxi development. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21, 305-324.
16. Cheng, B.S. (1995). Differential mode of association and Chinese organizational behavior. Indigenous Psychology Research, 3, 142-219. (In Chinese)
17. Cheng, B.S., Hsieh, P.Y., & Chou, L.F. (2002). A study of principal leadership style, subordinate-superior relation quality, and behavior unrelated to roles: Style transformation and the effect of parental leadership. Indigenous Psychology Research, 17, 105-161. (In Chinese)
18. Chi, L. (2003). Individualism, collectivism and familism: Conceptualizing a triangular relationship. Social Education Journal of the Taipei Municipal Normal University, 2, 115-145. (In Chinese)
19. Chow, C.L. (1995). In between new and traditional thinking: Selected works of May Fourth Movement. Taipei, Taiwan: Chinese Times. (In Chinese)
20. Chow, I.H., & Ng, I. (2004). The characteristics of Chinese personal ties (guanxi): Evidence from Hong Kong. Organization Studies, 25(7), 1075-1093.
21. Clark, M.S., & Mills, J. (1979). Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 12-24.
22. Confucious. (1959). The great learning (Trans. J. Legge). Taipei: Ching-Wei.
23. Dunning, J.H., & Kim, C. (2007). The cultural roots of guanxi: An exploratory study. The World Economy, 30(2), 329-341.
24. Durkheim, E. (1964). The division of labor in society (G. Simpson, Trans.). Glencoe, IL: Free Press. (Original work published 1893)
25. Emerson, R.M. (1981). Social exchange. In M. Rosenberg & R. Turner (Eds.), Social psychology: Sociological perspectives (pp. 30-65). New York: Basic Books.
26. Ezioni, A. (1968). The active society: A theory of societal and political processes. New York: Free Press.
27. Farh, J.L., Tsui, A.S., Xin, K.R., & Cheng, B.S. (1998). The influence of relational demography and guanxi: The Chinese case. Organization Science, 9, 471-487.
28. Fei, X.-T. (1993). Rural China and rural reconstruction. Taipei, Taiwan: Strom & Stress Publishing. (In Chinese)
29. Feng, Y.L. (1991a). The history of Chinese philosophy in China (new edition) (Vol. 1). Taipei, Taiwan: Random. (In Chinese)
30. Feng, Y.L. (1991b). The history of Chinese philosophy in China (new edition) (Vol. 1). Taipei, Taiwan: Random. (In Chinese)
31. Fischer, R., Ferreira, M., Assmar, E., Redford, P., Harb, C., Glazer, S., et al. (2009). Individualism-collectivism as descriptive norms: Development of a subjective norm approach to culture measurement. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 40(2), 187-213.
32. Fiske, A.P. (1991). Structure of social life: The four elementary forms of human relations. New York: Free Press.
33. Fiske, A.P. (2002). Using individualism and collectivism to compare culture: A critique of the validity and measurement of the constructs: Comment on Oyserman et al. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 78-88.
34. Fiske, A.P., Kitayama, S., Markus, H.R., & Nisbett, R.E. (1998). The cultural matrix of social psychology. In D.T. Gilbert & S.T. Fiske (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 915-981). New York: McGraw-Hill.
35. Gold, T., Guthrie, D., & Wank, D. (2002). An introduction to the study of guanxi. In T. Gold, D. Guthrie, & D. Wank (Eds.), Social connections in China: Institutions, culture and the changing nature of guanxi (pp. 3-20). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Greenberg, J., & Cohen, R.L. (1982). Why justice? Normative and instrumental interpretations. In J. Greenberg & R.L. Cohen (Eds.), Equity and justice in social behavior (pp. 437-469). New York: Academic Press.
37. Gudykunst, W.B. (1988). Culture and intergroup process. In M.H. Bond (Ed.), The crosscultural challenge to social psychology (pp. 165-181). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38. Gudykunst, W.B., Matsumoto, Y., Ting-Toomey, S., Nishida, T., Kim, K., & Heyman, S. (1996). The influence of cultural individualism-collectivism, self-construals, and individual values on communication styles across cultures. Human Communication Research, 22, 510-543.
39. Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40. Hamaguchi, E. (1977). Nihon rashisa no saihakken (The rediscovery of Japaneseness). Tokyo: Nihon Keizai Shinbunsha.
41. Heine, S.J. (2002). What's wrong with cross-cultural comparisons of subjective Likert scales: The reference-group effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 903-918.
42. Ho, Y.F., & Chiu, C.Y. (1994). Component ideas of individualism, collectivism, and social organization: An application in the study of Chinese culture. In U. Kim, H.C. Triandis, C. Kagitçibasi, S.C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and application (pp. 137-156). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43. Hofstede, G. (n.d.). Geert Hofstedee cultural dimensions. Retrieved from http://www.geert-hofstede.com/
44. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequence: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
45. Homans, G.C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. The American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597-606.
46. Hu, S. (1921). The introduction of Wu Yu's paper. In Wu Yu, Collection of papers (pp. 1-7). Shanghai: Ya-Dong. (In Chinese)
47. Huang, M.P. (2003). Organization leadership. In B.S. Cheng (Ed.), A thirty-year review of organizational behavior research in Taiwan (pp. 227-252). Taipei, Taiwan: Gueiguag. (In Chinese)
48. Hui, C.H. (1988). Measurement of individualism-collectivism. Journal of Research in Personality, 22, 17-36.
49. Hwang, K.K. (1987). Face and favor: The Chinese power game. American Journal of Sociology, 92(4), 945-974.
50. Hwang, K.K. (2005a). Confucian relationalism: Reflections on culture and the reconstruction of paradigm. Taipei, Taiwan: National Taiwan University. (In Chinese)
51. Hwang, K.K. (2005b). From "individualism vs. collectivism" to "relationalism": The objective of indigenizing social scientific research. Unpublished paper. (In Chinese)
52. Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
53. Jacobs, B.J. (1979). A preliminary model of particularistic ties in Chinese political alliances: Kan-cg'ing and Kuan-his in a rural Taiwanese township. The China Quarterly, 78(Jun.), 237-273.
54. Jin, N. (1995, September). Social identity theory and cooperation heuristic. Paper presented at the 36th annual meeting of Japanese Social Psychological Association, Tokyo, Japan.
55. Kayser, E., & Schwinger, T. (1982). A theoretical analysis of the relationship among individual justice concept, layman's psychology, and distribution decision. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 12, 47-51.
56. Kim, U., Trandis, H.C., Kagitcibasi, C., Choi, S., & Yoon, G. (Eds.) (1994). Individualism and collectivism: Theories, method, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
57. Kim, M.S., Hunter, J.E., Miyahara, A., Horvath, A., Bresnahan, M., & Yoon, H.J. (1996). Individual-vs. culture-level dimensions of individualism and collectivism: Effects on preferred conversational styles. Communication Monographs, 63(1), 28-49.
58. Kim, M.S., Smith, D.H., & Gu, Y. (1999). Medical decision making and Chinese patients' self-construals. Health Communication, 11(3), 249-260.
59. Kim, U. (1994). Individualism and collectivism: Conceptual clarification and elaboration. In U. Kim, H. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp. 19-40). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
60. Kim, U., & Lee, S.H. (1994, June). The Confucian mode of morality, justice, selfhood and society. Paper presented at the meeting of the eighth International Conference on Korean Studies, Seoul, Korea.
61. King, A. (1992). From traditional society to modern society. Taipei, Taiwan: Chinese Times. (In Chinese)
62. Kitayama, S. (2002). Cultural and basic psychological processes-toward a system view of culture: Comment on Oyserman et al. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 189-196.
63. Kitayama, S., Duffy, S., & Uchida, Y. (2007). Self as cultural mode of being. In S. Kitayama & D. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of cultural psychology (pp. 136-174). New York: The Guilford Press.
64. Kwan, S.Y., Bond, M.H., & Singelis, T.M. (1997). Pancultural explanations for life satisfaction: Adding harmony to self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1038-1051.
65. Law, K.S., Wong, C.S., Wang, D., & Wang, L. (2000). Effect of supervisor-subordinate guanxi on supervisory decisions in China: An empirical investigation. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 11(4), 751-765.
66. Lebra, T.S. (1976). Japanese pattern of behavior. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.
67. Lerner, M.J. (1981). The justice motive in human relations: Some thoughts on what we know and need to know about justice. In M. Lerner & S.C. Lerner (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior: Adapting to times of scarcity and change (pp. 11-35). New York: Plenum Press.
68. Li, S.C., & Chi, X.R. (2004). Upward influence strategies in organizations: Examining the differences between Western and Chinese upward influence models. Mass Communication Research, 80, 89-126. (In Chinese)
69. Luo, Y. (2000). Guanxi and business. Singapore: World Scientific.
70. Ma, R. (1992). The role of unofficial intermediaries in interpersonal conflicts in the Chinese culture. Communication Quarterly, 40(3), 269-276.
71. Ma, R. (2004). Guanxi and Chinese communication behavior. In G.M. Chen (Ed.), Theories and principles of Chinese communication (pp. 363-377). Taipei, Taiwan: WuNan. (In Chinese)
72. Ma, R., & Chuang, R. (2001). Persuasion strategies of Chinese college students in interpersonal contexts. The Southern Communication Journal, 66(4), 267-278.
73. Macpherson, C.B. (1962). The political theory of possessive individualism: Hobbes to Locke. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
74. Markus, H.R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224-253.
75. Matsumoto, D. (1999). Culture and self: An empirical assessment of Markus and Kitayama's theory of independent and interdependent self-construals. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 289-310.
76. Morling, B., & Lamoureaux, M. (2008). Measure culture outside the head: A meta-analysis of individualism collectivism in cultural products. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 199-220.
77. Nakane, C. (1970). Japanese society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
78. Nee, V. (1992). Organizational dynamics of market transition: Hybrid forms, property rights, and mixed economy in China. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 1-27.
79. Niles, F.S. (1998). Individualism-Collectivism revisited. Cross-Cultural Research, 32, 315-341.
80. Osigweh, C.A.B., & Huo, Y.P. (1993). Conceptions of employee responsibilities and rights in the United States and the People's Republic of China. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 4(1), 85-112.
81. Oyserman, D., Coon, H.M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 3-72.
82. Prentice, D., Miller, D., & Lightdale, J. (1994). Asymmetries in attachments to groups and to their members: Distinguishing between common-identity and common-bond groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 484-493.
83. Rotenburg, M. (1977). Alienating individualism and reciprocal individualism: A cross-culture conceptualization. The Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 17(3), 3-17.
84. Sampson, E.E. (2001). Reinterpreting individualism and collectivism: Their religious roots and monologic versus idalogic person-other relationship. American Psychologist, 55, 1425-1432.
85. Schimmack, U., Oishi, S., & Diener, E. (2005). Individualism: A valid and important dimension of cultural differences between nations. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 9, 17-31.
86. Schwartz, S.H. (1990). Individualism-collectivism: Critique and proposed refinements. Journal of Cross-Culture Psychology Bulletin, 20, 139-157.
87. Seo, K.K., Miller, P.C., Schumidt, C., & Sowa, P. (2008). Creating synergy between collectivism and individualism in cyberspace: A comparison of online communication patterns between Hong Kong and U.S. students. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 18. Retrieved from http://immi.se/intercultural/nr18/kay.htm.
88. Shulruf, B., Hattie, J., & Dixon, R. (2007). Development of a new measurement tool for individualism and collectivism. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 25, 385-400.
89. Smith, P.B., & Bond, M.H. (1999). Social psychology across cultures (2nd ed.). Boston: Ginn.
90. Sun, L.J. (1990). The deep structure of Chinese culture. Taipei, Taiwan: Tonsan. (In Chinese)
91. Takano, Y., & Osaka, E. (1999). An unsupported common view: Comparing Japan and the U.S. on individualism-collectivism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 311-341.
92. Triandis, H.C. (1989). The Self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506-520.
93. Triandis, H.C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.
94. Triandis, H.C. (2001). Individualism-Collectivism and personality. Journal of Personality, 69(6), 907-924.
95. Tsang, E.W.K. (1998). Can guanxi be a source of sustained competitive advantage for doing business in China? Academy of Management Executive, 12(2), 64-73.
96. Tsui, A.S., & Farh, J.L. (1997). Where guanxi matters: Relational demography and guanxi in the Chinese context. Work & Occupations, 24(1), 56-79.
97. Tu, W.M. (1985). Confucian thought: Selfhood as creative transformation. New York: State University of New York Press.
98. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
99. Xin, K.R. (1997). Asian American managers: An impression gap?-An investigation of impression management and supervisor-subordinate relationship. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 33(3), 335-355.
100. Xin, K.R., & Pearce, J.L. (1996). Guanxi: Connections as substitutes for formal institutional support. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1641-1658.
101. Yamagishi, T., Nobuhito, J., & Kiyonari, T. (1999). Bounded generalized reciprocity: In-group favoritism and in-group boasting. Advances in Group Processes, 16, 161-197.
102. Yang, C.F. (1991). The Chinese self: Theory and research direction. In C.F. Yang & S.R. Kao (Eds.), The psychology of the Chinese people (pp. 94-144). Taipei, Taiwan: Yuan-Liou Publishing. (In Chinese)
103. Yang, C.F. (2001a). A critical review of the conceptualization of guanxi and renqing. In C.F. Yang (Ed.), The interpersonal relationship, affection, and trust of the Chinese: From an interactional perspective (pp. 3-26). Taipei, Taiwan:Yuan Liou Publishing. (In Chinese)
104. Yang, C.F. (2001b). A reconceptualization of the Chinese guanxi and renqing. In C.F. Yang (Ed.), The interpersonal relationship, affection, and trust of the Chinese: From an interactional perspective (pp. 337-370). Taipei, Taiwan: Yuan Liou Publishing. (In Chinese)
105. Yang, K.S. (1996). The psychological transformation of the Chinese people as a result of societal modernization. In M.H. Bond (Ed.), The psychology of the Chinese people (pp. 479-498). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
106. Yang, M.M. (1994). Gifts, favors, and banquets: The art of social relationships in China. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
107. Yang, M.M. (2002). The resilience of guanxi and its new deployments: A critique of some new guanxi scholarship. The China Quarterly, 170(Jun.), 459-476.
108. Yeh, J.H., & Chen, L. (2004). Value orientations of self-construals and argumentative behaviors in China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan. Mass Communication Research, 80, 51-87. (In Chinese)
109. Yeh, R.C. (1996). The hierarchical order of Confucianism: Inquiry to the prototype in the Pre-Ch'in. Taipei, Taiwan: Rui xing. (In Chinese)
110. Yeung, I.Y., & Tung, R.L. (1996). Achieving business success in Confucian societies: The importance of guanxi (connections). Organizational Dynamics, 25(2), 54-65.
111. Yu, Y.S. (1987). Examining the modern significance of Chinese culture through its value system. Taipei, Taiwan: Chinese Times. (In Chinese)
112. Yuki, M. (2003). Intergroup comparison versus intragroup relationships: A cross-cultural examination of social identity theory in North American and East Asian cultural context. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66(2), 166-183.
113. Yuki, M., Maddux, W.W., Brewer, M.B., & Takemura, K. (2005). Cross-cultural differences in relationship-and group-based trust. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 48-62.
114. Yum, J.O. (1988). The impact of Confucianism on interpersonal relationships and communication patterns in East Asia. Communication Monographs, 55, 374-388.