Autonomous 3D object modeling by a humanoid using an optimization-driven next-best-view formulation

International Journal of Humanoid Robotics

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 407-428

  Foissotte, Torea ^a,b   Stasse, Olivier ^a,b   Wieber, Pierre Brice ^c   Escande, Adrien ^d   Kheddar, Abderrahmane ^a,b  

^a LIRMM   (France)

^b National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology   (Japan)

^c INRIA   (France)

^d CEA LIST   (France)

Author keywords

humanoid; NEWUOA; next best view; Object modeling; optimization; posture generation

Indexed keywords

HUMANOID; NEWUOA; NEXT-BEST-VIEW; OBJECT MODELING; POSTURE GENERATION;

ANTHROPOMORPHIC ROBOTS; COMPUTER VISION; OPTIMIZATION; SENSORS;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

EID: 78649266994     PISSN: 02198436     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S0219843610002246     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. O. Stasse, T. Foissotte and A. Kheddar, Treasure hunting for humanoids robot, in IEEE RAS/RSJ International Conference on Humanoids Robots, Workshop on Cognitive Humanoid Vision (Daejeon, South Korea, 2008).
2. D. Meger, P.-E. Forssen, K. Lai, S. Helmer, S. McCann, T. Southey, M. Baumann, J. J. Little and D. G. Lowe, Curious George: An attentive semantic robot, Robotics and Autonomous Systems 56 (6) (2008) 503-511.
3. D. G. Lowe, Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints, International Journal of Computer Vision 60 (4) (2004) 91-110.
4. J. M. Morel and G. Yu, ASIFT: A new framework for fully affine invariant image comparison, SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences 2 (2) (2009) 438-469.
5. H. Bay, A. Ess, T. Tuytelaars and L. Van Gool, SURF: Speeded up robust features, Computer Vision and Image Understanding (CVIU) 110 (3) (2008) 346-359.
6. J. Sanchiz and R. Fisher, A next-best-view algorithm for 3D scene recovery with 5 degrees of freedom, in British Machine Vision Conference (Nottingham, UK, 1999), pp. 163-172.
7. F. Saidi, O. Stasse, K. Yokoi and F. Kanehiro, Online object search with a humanoid robot, in IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (2007), pp. 1677-1682.
8. D. G. Lowe, Local feature view clustering for 3D object recognition, in IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2001), pp. 682-688.
9. K. Yamazaki, M. Tomono, T. Tsubouchi and S. Yuta, 3-D object modeling by a camera equipped on a mobile robot, in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (2004), pp. 1399-1405.
10. C. Connolly, The determination of next best views, in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (1985), pp. 432-435.
11. J. E. Banta, L. R. Wong, C. Dumont and M. A. Abidi, A next-best-view system for autonomous 3-D object reconstruction, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A 30 (5) (2000) 589-598.
12. J. Maver and R. Bajcsy, Occlusions as a guide for planning the next view, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 17 (5) (1993) 417-433.
13. R. Pito, A solution to the next best view problem for automated surface acquisition, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 21 (10) (1999) 1016-1030.
14. K. A. Tarabanis, P. K. Allen and R. Y. Tsai, A survey of sensor planning in computer vision, IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 11 (1) (1995) 86-104.
15. W. R. Scott, G. Roth and J. F. Rivest, View planning for automated three-dimensional object reconstruction and inspection, ACM Computing Surveys 35 (1) (2003) 64-96.
16. A. Hertzmann, Introduction to 3D non-photorealistic rendering: Silhouettes and outlines, in SIGGRAPH 99 Course Notes (1999).
17. J.-P. Laumond, Kineo CAM: A success story of motion planning algorithms, IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine 13 (2) (2006) 90-93.
18. M. J. D. Powell, The NEWUOA software for unconstrained optimization without derivatives, in DAMTP Report 2004/NA05 (University of Cambridge, England, 2004).
19. A. Escande, A. Kheddar and S. Miossec, Planning support contact-points for humanoid robots and experiments on HRP-2, in IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (2006), pp. 2974-2979.
20. T. Foissotte, O. Stasse, A. Escande and A. Kheddar, A next-best-view algorithm for autonomous 3D object modeling by a humanoid robot, in IEEE RAS/RSJ International Conference on Humanoids Robots (Daejeon, South Korea, 2008), pp. 333-338.
21. A. Escande, S. Miossec and A. Kheddar, Continuous gradient proximity distance for humanoids collision-free optimized postures, in IEEE RAS/RSJ International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Pittsburg, USA, 2007), pp. 188-195.
22. O. Stasse, D. Larlus, B. Lagarde, A. Escande, F. Saidi, A. Kheddar, K. Yokoi and F. Jurie, Towards autonomous object reconstruction for visual search by the humanoid robot HRP-2, in IEEE RAS/RSJ International Conference on Humanoids Robots (Pittsburg, USA, 2007), pp. 151-158.
23. P. Evrard, F. Keith, J.-R. Chardonnet and A. Kheddar, Framework for haptic interaction with virtual avatars, in IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (ROMAN) (Munich, Germany, 2008), pp. 15-20.