Caloric vestibular stimulation reveals discrete neural mechanisms for coherence rivalry and eye rivalry: A meta-rivalry model

Vision Research

Volumn 47, Issue 21, 2007, Pages 2685-2699

  Ngo, Trung T ^a,c,d   Liu, Guang B ^a,b   Tilley, Andrew J ^a   Pettigrew, John D ^a   Miller, Steven M ^c,d,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^c Caulfield General Medical Centre   (Australia)

^d ALFRED HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^e MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Amalgam view; Binocular rivalry; Bottom up versus top down processing; Caloric vestibular stimulation; Coherence rivalry; Interhemispheric switching; Interocular grouping; Meta rivalry; Multistability; Visual consciousness

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; CALORIC VESTIBULAR TEST; CONSCIOUSNESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE DOMINANCE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MODEL; NEUROOPHTHALMOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VESTIBULAR STIMULATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; COLD; DOMINANCE, CEREBRAL; DOMINANCE, OCULAR; EYE MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; VESTIBULAR NERVE; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 34548822134     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.03.024     Document Type: Article

References (141)

1. Alais D., Lorenceau J., Arrighi R., and Cass J. Contour interactions between pairs of Gabors engaged in binocular rivalry reveal a map of the association field. Vision Research 46 8-9 (2006) 1473-1487
2. Alais D., and Melcher D. Strength and coherence of binocular rivalry depends on shared stimulus complexity. Vision Research 47 2 (2007) 269-279
3. Alais D., O'Shea R.P., Mesana-Alais C., and Wilson I.G. On binocular alternation. Perception 29 12 (2000) 1437-1445
4. Alexander L.T. The influence of figure-ground relationships in binocular rivalry. Journal of Experimental Psychology 41 5 (1951) 376-381
5. Alexander L.T., and Bricker P. Figure-ground contrast and binocular rivalry. Journal of Experimental Psychology 44 6 (1952) 452-454
6. Alvarez G.A., and Cavanagh P. Independent resources for attentional tracking in the left and right visual hemifields. Psychological Science 16 8 (2005) 637-643
7. André J.-M., Martinet N., Paysant J., Beis J.-M., and Le Chapelain L. Temporary phantom limbs evoked by vestibular caloric stimulation in amputees. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology, and Behavioral Neurology 14 3 (2001) 190-196
8. Arguin M., Lassonde M., Quattrini A., Del Pesce M., Foschi N., and Papo I. Divided visuo-spatial attention systems with total and anterior callosotomy. Neuropsychologia 38 3 (2000) 283-291
9. Bächtold D., Baumann T., Sándor P.S., Kritos M., Regard M., and Brugger P. Spatial- and verbal-memory improvement by cold-water caloric stimulation in healthy subjects. Experimental Brain Research 136 1 (2001) 128-132
10. Bárány R. Untersuchungen über den vom Vestibularapparat des Ohres reflektorisch ausgelösten rhythmischen Nystagmus und seine Begleiterscheinungen. Monatsschrift für Ohrenheilkunde 40 (1906) 193-297
11. Beis, J. -M., Keller, C., Morin, N., Bartolomeo, P., Bernati, T., Chokron, S., et al., French Collaborative Study Group on Assessment of Unilateral Neglect (GEREN/GRECO) (2004). Right spatial neglect after left hemisphere stroke: Qualitative and quantitative study. Neurology, 63(9), 1600-1605.
12. Blake R. A neural theory of binocular rivalry. Psychological Review 96 1 (1989) 145-167
13. Blake R. A primer on binocular rivalry, including current controversies. Brain and Mind 2 1 (2001) 5-38
14. Blake R., Fox R., and McIntyre C. Stochastic properties of stabilized-image binocular rivalry alternations. Journal of Experimental Psychology 88 3 (1971) 327-332
15. Blake R., and Logothetis N.K. Visual competition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 3 1 (2002) 13-21
16. Blake R., Yu K., Lokey M., and Norman H. Binocular rivalry and motion perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 10 1 (1998) 46-60
17. Blumberg H.P., Stern E., Martinez D., Ricketts S., de Asis J., White T., et al. Increased anterior cingulate and caudate activity in bipolar mania. Biological Psychiatry 48 11 (2000) 1045-1052
18. Bogen, J., Berker, E., Van Lancker, D., Sudia, S., Lipstad, B., Sadun, A., et al. (1998). Left hemicerebrectomy: Vision, olfaction and mentation 45 years later. Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of the Society for Neuroscience, Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, 24, 173 (Abstract).
19. Bonneh Y.S., Pavlovskaya M., Ring H., and Soroker N. Abnormal binocular rivalry in unilateral neglect: Evidence for a non-spatial mechanism of extinction. Neuroreport 15 3 (2004) 473-477
20. Bonneh Y., Sagi D., and Karni A. A transition between eye and object rivalry determined by stimulus coherence. Vision Research 41 8 (2001) 981-989
21. Bottini G., Karnath H.-O., Vallar G., Sterzi R., Frith C.D., Frackowiak R.S.J., et al. Cerebral representations for egocentric space. Functional-anatomical evidence from caloric vestibular stimulation and neck vibration. Brain 124 6 (2001) 1182-1196
22. Bottini G., Paulesu E., Gandola M., Loffredo S., Scarpa P., Sterzi R., et al. Left caloric vestibular stimulation ameliorates right hemianesthesia. Neurology 65 8 (2005) 1278-1283
23. Bottini G., Sterzi R., Paulesu E., Vallar G., Cappa S.F., Erminio F., et al. Identification of the central vestibular projections in man: A positron emission tomography activation study. Experimental Brain Research 99 1 (1994) 164-169
24. Botvinick M.M., Cohen J.D., and Carter C.S. Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: An update. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8 12 (2004) 539-546
25. Bowen A., McKenna K., and Tallis R.C. Reasons for variability in the reported rate of occurrence of unilateral spatial neglect after stroke. Stroke 30 6 (1999) 1196-1202
26. Breese B.B. On inhibition. Psychological Monographs 3 1 (1899) 1-65
27. Breese B.B. Can binocular rivalry be suppressed by practise?. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 6 25 (1909) 686-687
28. Cappa S., Sterzi R., Vallar G., and Bisiach E. Remission of hemineglect and anosognosia during vestibular stimulation. Neuropsychologia 25 5 (1987) 775-782
29. Chong S.C., and Blake R. Exogenous attention and endogenous attention influence initial dominance in binocular rivalry. Vision Research 46 11 (2006) 1794-1803
30. Chong, S. C., Tadin, D., & Blake, R. (2005). Endogenous attention prolongs dominance durations in binocular rivalry. Journal of Vision, 5(11), 1004-1012, http://journalofvision.org/5/11/6/, doi:10.1167/5.11.6.
31. Coats A.C., and Smith S.Y. Body position and the intensity of caloric nystagmus. Acta Otolaryngologica (Stockholm) 63 6 (1967) 515-532
32. Corbetta M., and Shulman G.L. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 3 3 (2002) 201-215
33. de Weert C.M.M., Snoeren P.R., and Koning A. Interactions between binocular rivalry and Gestalt formation. Vision Research 45 19 (2005) 2571-2579
34. Díaz-Caneja E. Sur l'alternance binoculaire. Annales D'Oculistique 165 (1928) 721-731
35. Dodson M.J. Vestibular stimulation in mania: A case report. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 75 1 (2004) 168-169
36. Fahle M. Cooperation between different spatial frequencies in binocular rivalry. Biological Cybernetics 44 1 (1982) 27-29
37. Fahle M. Binocular rivalry: Suppression depends on orientation and spatial frequency. Vision Research 22 7 (1982) 787-800
38. Fahle M. Non-fusable stimuli and the role of binocular inhibition in normal and pathologic vision, especially strabismus. Documenta Ophthalmologica 55 4 (1983) 323-340
39. Fife T.D., Tusa R.J., Furman J.M., Zee D.S., Frohman E., Baloh R.W., et al. Assessment: Vestibular testing techniques in adults and children. Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 55 10 (2000) 1431-1441
40. Fox R., and Herrmann J. Stochastic properties of binocular rivalry alternations. Perception and Psychophysics 2 9 (1967) 432-436
41. Freeman A.W. Multistage model for binocular rivalry. Journal of Neurophysiology 94 6 (2005) 4412-4420
42. Gross C.G., Rodman H.R., Gochin P.M., and Colombo M.W. Inferior temporal cortex as a pattern recognition device. In: Baum E.B. (Ed). Computational learning and cognition: Proceedings of the third NEC research symposium (1993), SIAM, Philadelphia, PA 44-73
43. Grossmann J.K., and Dobbins A.C. Competition in bistable vision is attribute-specific. Vision Research 46 3 (2006) 285-292
44. Hancock S., and Andrews T.J. The role of voluntary and involuntary attention in selecting perceptual dominance during binocular rivalry. Perception 36 2 (2007) 288-298
45. Haynes J.-D., Deichmann R., and Rees G. Eye-specific effects of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus. Nature 438 7067 (2005) 496-499
46. Haynes J.-D., and Rees G. Predicting the stream of consciousness from activity in human visual cortex. Current Biology 15 14 (2005) 1301-1307
47. Helmholtz, H. von. (1867/1962). Handbuch der physiologischen Optik (Leipzig: Voss). Treatise on physiological optics Vol. III, J. P. C. Southall (New York: Dover, 1962), trans 3rd German edition (Hamburg: Voss, 1910).
48. Hering, E. (1879/1942). Der Raumsinn und die Bewegungen des Auges, In L. Hermann (Ed.), Handbuch der Physiologie, III (1879, pp. 343-601, Leipzig: Vogel). Spatial sense and movements of the eye, C. A. Radde, trans (Baltimore, MD: American Academy of Optometry, 1942).
49. Indovina I., Maffei V., Bosco G., Zago M., Macaluso E., and Lacquaniti F. Representation of visual gravitational motion in the human vestibular cortex. Science 308 5720 (2005) 416-419
50. James W. The principles of psychology (1890), Macmillan, London
51. Johannsen L., Akermann H., and Karnath H.-O. Lasting amelioration of spatial neglect by treatment with neck muscle vibration even without concurrent training. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 35 6 (2003) 249-253
52. Karnath H.-O., Berger M.F., Küker W., and Rorden C. The anatomy of spatial neglect based on voxelwise statistical analysis: A study of 140 patients. Cerebral Cortex 14 10 (2004) 1164-1172
53. Knapen T., Paffen C., Kanai R., and van Ee R. Stimulus flicker alters interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Vision Research 47 1 (2007) 1-7
54. Koch C., and Tsuchiya N. Attention and consciousness: Two distinct brain processes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11 1 (2007) 16-22
55. Kovács I., Papathomas T.V., Yang M., and Feher A. When the brain changes its mind: Interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 93 26 (1996) 15508-15511
56. Kraft A., Müller N.G., Hagendorf H., Schira M.M., Dick S., Fendrich R.M., et al. Interactions between task difficulty and hemispheric distribution of attended locations: Implications for the splitting attention debate. Cognitive Brain Research 24 1 (2005) 19-32
57. Lack L. Selective attention and the control of binocular rivalry (1978), The Hague, Mouton
58. Lamme V.A.F. Towards a true neural stance on consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10 11 (2006) 494-501
59. Lavidor M., and Walsh V. The nature of foveal representation. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 5 9 (2004) 729-735
60. Le Chapelain L., Beis J.-M., Paysant J., and André J.-M. Vestibular caloric stimulation evokes phantom limb illusions in patients with paraplegia. Spinal Cord 39 2 (2001) 85-87
61. Lee S.-H., and Blake R. Rival ideas about binocular rivalry. Vision Research 39 8 (1999) 1447-1454
62. Lee, S.-H., & Blake, R. (2002). V1 activity is reduced during binocular rivalry. Journal of Vision, 2(9), 618-626, http://journalofvision.org/2/9/4/, doi:10.1167/2.9.4.
63. Lee S.-H., and Blake R. A fresh look at interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Vision Research 44 10 (2004) 983-991
64. Leff A. A historical review of the representation of the visual field in primary visual cortex with special reference to the neural mechanisms underlying macular sparing. Brain and Language 88 3 (2004) 268-278
65. Leibovitch F.S., Black S.E., Caldwell C.B., Ebert P.L., Ehrlich L.E., and Szalai J.P. Brain-behavior correlations in hemispatial neglect using CT and SPECT: The Sunnybrook Stroke Study. Neurology 50 4 (1998) 901-908
66. Leibovitch F.S., Black S.E., Caldwell C.B., McIntosh A.R., Ehrlich L.E., and Szalai J.P. Brain SPECT imaging and left hemispatial neglect covaried using partial least squares: The Sunnybrook Stroke Study. Human Brain Mapping 7 4 (1999) 244-253
67. Leopold D.A., and Logothetis N.K. Activity changes in early visual cortex reflect monkeys' percepts during binocular rivalry. Nature 379 6565 (1996) 549-553
68. Leopold D.A., and Logothetis N.K. Multistable phenomena: Changing views in perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3 7 (1999) 254-264
69. Levelt W.J.M. Note on the distribution of dominance times in binocular rivalry. British Journal of Psychology 58 1-2 (1967) 143-145
70. Logothetis N.K. Single units and conscious vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 353 1377 (1998) 1801-1818
71. Logothetis N.K., Leopold D.A., and Sheinberg D.L. What is rivalling during binocular rivalry?. Nature 380 6575 (1996) 621-624
72. Luck S.J., Hillyard S.A., Mangun G.R., and Gazzaniga M.S. Independent hemispheric attentional systems mediate visual search in split-brain patients. Nature 342 6249 (1989) 543-545
73. Lumer E.D., Friston K.J., and Rees G. Neural correlates of perceptual rivalry in the human brain. Science 280 5371 (1998) 1930-1934
74. McDougall W. III.-The physiological factors of the attention-process (III.). Mind 12 48 (1903) 473-488
75. McDougall W. III.-Physiological factors of the attention-process (IV.). Mind 15 59 (1906) 329-359
76. Meng, M., & Tong, F. (2004). Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures. Journal of Vision, 4(7), 539-551, http://journalofvision.org/4/7/2/, doi:10.1167/4.7.2.
77. Miller S.M. Binocular rivalry and the cerebral hemispheres: With a note on the correlates and constitution of visual consciousness. Brain and Mind 2 1 (2001) 119-149
78. Miller S.M., Gynther B.D., Heslop K.R., Liu G.B., Mitchell P.B., Ngo T.T., et al. Slow binocular rivalry in bipolar disorder. Psychological Medicine 33 4 (2003) 683-692
79. Miller S.M., Liu G.B., Ngo T.T., Hooper G., Riek S., Carson R.G., et al. Interhemispheric switching mediates perceptual rivalry. Current Biology 10 7 (2000) 383-392
80. Miller S.M. On the correlation/constitution distinction problem (and other hard problems) in the scientific study of consciousness. Acta Neuropsychiatrica 19 3 (2007) 159-176
81. Miller S.M., and Ngo T.T. Studies of caloric vestibular stimulation: Implications for the cognitive neurosciences, the clinical neurosciences and neurophilosophy. Acta Neuropsychiatrica 19 3 (2007) 183-203
82. Mitchell J.F., Stoner G.R., and Reynolds J.H. Object-based attention determines dominance in binocular rivalry. Nature 429 6990 (2004) 410-413
83. Murata T., Matsui N., Miyauchi S., Kakita Y., and Yanagida T. Discrete stochastic process underlying perceptual rivalry. Neuroreport 14 10 (2003) 1347-1352
84. Ngo T.T., Miller S.M., Liu G.B., and Pettigrew J.D. Binocular rivalry and perceptual coherence. Current Biology 10 4 (2000) R134-R136
85. Norman H.F., Norman J.F., and Bilotta J. The temporal course of suppression during binocular rivalry. Perception 29 7 (2000) 831-841
86. Ooi T.L., and He Z.J. Binocular rivalry and visual awareness: The role of attention. Perception 28 5 (1999) 551-574
87. Ooi T.L., and He Z.J. A distributed intercortical processing of binocular rivalry: Psychophysical evidence. Perception 32 2 (2003) 155-166
88. Ooi T.L., and He Z.J. Surface representation and attention modulation mechanisms in binocular rivalry. In: Alais D., and Blake R. (Eds). Binocular rivalry (2005), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 117-135
89. O'Shea R.P., and Corballis P.M. Binocular rivalry between complex stimuli in split-brain observers. Brain and Mind 2 1 (2001) 151-160
90. O'Shea, R. P., & Corballis, P. M. (2003). Binocular rivalry in split-brain observers. Journal of Vision, 3(10), 610-615, http://journalofvision.org/3/10/3/, doi:10.1167/3.10.3.
91. O'Shea R.P., and Corballis P.M. Visual grouping on binocular rivalry in a split-brain observer. Vision Research 45 2 (2005) 247-261
92. Paffen C.L.E., Alais D., and Verstraten F.A.J. Attention speeds binocular rivalry. Psychological Science 17 9 (2006) 752-756
93. Papathomas T.V., Kovács I., and Conway T. Interocular grouping in binocular rivalry: Basic attributes and combinations. In: Alais D., and Blake R. (Eds). Binocular rivalry (2005), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 155-168
94. Papathomas T.V., Kovács I., Feher A., and Julesz B. Visual dilemmas: Competition between eyes and between percepts in binocular rivalry. In: Lepore E., and Pylyshyn Z. (Eds). What is cognitive science? (1999), Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA 263-294
95. Pearson J., and Clifford C.W.G. Suppressed patterns alter vision during binocular rivalry. Current Biology 15 23 (2005) 2142-2148
96. Pearson J., and Clifford C.W.G. When your brain decides what you see: Grouping across monocular, binocular, and stimulus rivalry. Psychological Science 16 7 (2005) 516-519
97. Pettigrew J.D. Searching for the switch: Neural bases for perceptual rivalry alternations. Brain and Mind 2 1 (2001) 85-118
98. Pettigrew J.D., Collin S.P., and Ott M. Convergence of highly-specialised behaviour, eye movements and visual optics in the sandlance (Teleostei) and the chameleon (Reptilia). Current Biology 9 8 (1999) 421-424
99. Pettigrew J.D., and Miller S.M. A 'sticky' interhemispheric switch in bipolar disorder?. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 265 1411 (1998) 2141-2148
100. Polonsky A., Blake R., Braun J., and Heeger D.J. Neuronal activity in human primary visual cortex correlates with perception during binocular rivalry. Nature Neuroscience 3 11 (2000) 1153-1159
101. Posner M.I., and DiGirolamo G.J. Attention in cognitive neuroscience: An overview. In: Gazzaniga M.S. (Ed). The new cognitive neurosciences (2000), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 623-631
102. Posner M.I., and Petersen S.E. The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience 13 (1990) 25-42
103. Ramachandran V.S. Phantom limbs, neglect syndromes and Freudian psychology. International Review of Neurobiology 37 (1994) 291-333
104. Rode G., Charles N., Perenin M.-T., Vighetto A., Trillet M., and Aimard G. Partial remission of hemiplegia and somatoparaphrenia through vestibular stimulation in a case of unilateral neglect. Cortex 28 2 (1992) 203-208
105. Rode G., Perenin M.-T., Honoré J., and Boisson D. Improvement of the motor deficit of neglect patients through vestibular stimulation: Evidence for a motor neglect component. Cortex 34 2 (1998) 253-261
106. Rossetti Y., and Rode G. Reducing spatial neglect by visual and other sensory manipulations: Noncognitive (physiological) routes to the rehabilitation of a cognitive disorder. In: Karnath H.-O., Milner D., and Vallarm G. (Eds). The cognitive and neural bases of spatial neglect (2002), Oxford University Press, Oxford 375-396
107. Sasaki H., and Gyoba J. Selective attention to stimulus features modulates interocular suppression. Perception 31 4 (2002) 409-419
108. Schindler I., Kerkhoff G., Karnath H.-O., Keller I., and Goldenberg G. Neck muscle vibration induces lasting recovery in spatial neglect. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 73 4 (2002) 412-419
109. Schmäl F., Lübben B., Weiberg K., and Stoll W. The minimal ice water caloric test compared with established vestibular caloric test procedures. Journal of Vestibular Research 15 4 (2005) 215-224
110. Schor C.M. Visual stimuli for strabismic suppression. Perception 6 5 (1977) 583-593
111. Sengpiel F. Binocular rivalry: Ambiguities resolved. Current Biology 7 7 (1997) R447-R450
112. Sheinberg D.L., and Logothetis N.K. The role of temporal cortical areas in perceptual organization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 94 7 (1997) 3408-3413
113. Sherrington C.S. Integrative action of the nervous system (1906), Yale University Press, New Haven
114. Silberpfennig J. Contributions to the problem of eye movements. III. Disturbances of ocular movements with pseudohemianopsia in frontal lobe tumors. Confinia Neurologica 4 1-2 (1941) 1-13
115. Silver M.A., and Logothetis N.K. Temporal frequency and contrast tagging bias the type of competition in interocular switch rivalry. Vision Research 47 4 (2007) 532-543
116. Stone J. The naso-temporal division of the cat's retina. Journal of Comparative Neurology 126 4 (1966) 585-600
117. Stone J., Leicester J., and Sherman S.M. The naso-temporal division of the monkey's retina. Journal of Comparative Neurology 150 3 (1973) 333-348
118. Suzuki S., and Grabowecky M. Evidence for perceptual "trapping" and adaptation in multistable binocular rivalry. Neuron 36 1 (2002) 143-157
119. Tong F., and Engel S. Interocular rivalry revealed in the human cortical blind-spot representation. Nature 411 6834 (2001) 195-199
120. Tong F., Meng M., and Blake R. Neural bases of binocular rivalry. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10 11 (2006) 502-511
121. Tong F., Nakayama K., Vaughan J.T., and Kanwisher N. Binocular rivalry and visual awareness in human extrastriate cortex. Neuron 21 4 (1998) 753-759
122. Tononi G., and Edelman G.M. Consciousness and complexity. Science 282 5395 (1998) 1846-1851
123. Towne J. The stereoscope, and stereoscopic results-Section III. Guy's Hospital Reports 9 (1863) 102-125
124. Towne J. The stereoscope, and stereoscopic results-Section V. Guy's Hospital Reports 10 (1864) 125-141
125. Vallar G., Guariglia C., and Rusconi M.L. Modulation of the neglect syndrome by sensory stimulation. In: Their P., and Karnath H.-O. (Eds). Parietal lobe contributions to orientation in 3D Space (1997), Springer-Verlag, Berlin 555-578
126. van Dam L.C., and van Ee R. The role of saccades in exerting voluntary control in perceptual and binocular rivalry. Vision Research 46 6-7 (2006) 787-799
127. van Ee R., Noest A.J., Brascamp J.W., and van den Berg A.V. Attentional control over either of the two competing percepts of ambiguous stimuli revealed by a two-parameter analysis: Means do not make the difference. Vision Research 46 19 (2006) 3129-3141
128. van Ee R., van Dam L.C., and Brouwer G.J. Voluntary control and the dynamics of perceptual bi-stability. Vision Research 45 1 (2005) 41-55
129. Vitte E., Derosier C., Caritu Y., Berthoz A., Hasboun D., and Soulié S. Activation of the hippocampal formation by vestibular stimulation: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Experimental Brain Research 112 3 (1996) 523-526
130. Wade N.J., de Weert C.M.M., and Swanston M.T. Binocular rivalry with moving patterns. Perception and Psychophysics 35 2 (1984) 111-122
131. Wade N.J., Ono H., and Mapp A.P. The lost direction in binocular vision: The neglected signs posted by Wells, Towne, and LeConte. Journal of the History of Behavioral Sciences 42 1 (2006) 61-86
132. Wales R., and Fox R. Increment detection thresholds during binocular rivalry suppression. Perception and Psychophysics 8 2 (1970) 90-94
133. Walker P. Binocular rivalry: Central or peripheral selective processes?. Psychological Bulletin 85 2 (1978) 376-389
134. Wenzel R., Bartenstein P., Dieterich M., Danek A., Weindl A., Minoshima S., et al. Deactivation of human visual cortex during involuntary ocular oscillations. A PET activation study. Brain 119 1 (1996) 101-110
135. Whittle P. Binocular rivalry and the contrast at contours. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 17 3 (1965) 217-226
136. Williams M.A., Morris A.P., McGlone F., Abbott D.F., and Mattingley J.B. Amygdala responses to fearful and happy facial expressions under conditions of binocular suppression. Journal of Neuroscience 24 12 (2004) 2898-2904
137. Wilke M., Logothetis N.K., and Leopold D.A. Local field potential reflects perceptual suppression in monkey visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the Unites States of America 103 46 (2006) 17507-17512
138. Wilson H.R. Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100 24 (2003) 14499-144503
139. Wolfe J. Resolving perceptual ambiguity. Nature 380 6575 (1996) 587-588
140. Wong E.M., and Freeman A.W. Colour but not form patterns combine between the eyes. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Ophthalmology 27 3-4 (1999) 275-277
141. Wunderlich K., Schneider K.A., and Kastner S. Neural correlates of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus. Nature Neuroscience 8 11 (2005) 1595-1602