Distance in feature space determines exclusivity in visual rivalry

Vision Research

Volumn 47, Issue 26, 2007, Pages 3269-3275

  Knapen, Tomas ^a   Kanai, Ryota ^b   Brascamp, Jan ^a   van Boxtel, Jeroen ^a   van Ee, Raymond ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Binocular rivalry; Perceptual rivalry; Perceptual suppression

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; BRAIN FUNCTION; COLOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE FIXATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MONOCULAR VISION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THEORETICAL MODEL; VISION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ATTENTION; COLOR PERCEPTION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CUES; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DOMINANCE, OCULAR; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, BINOCULAR;

EID: 36049013026     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.09.005     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Alais D., and Blake R. Grouping visual features during binocular rivalry. Vision Research 39 26 (1999) 4341-4353
2. Alais D., and Melcher D. Strength and coherence of binocular rivalry depends on shared stimulus complexity. Vision Research 47 2 (2006) 269-279
3. Alais D., and Parker A. Independent binocular rivalry processes for motion and form. Neuron 52 5 (2006) 911-920
4. Andrews T.J., and Lotto R.B. Fusion and rivalry are dependent on the perceptual meaning of visual stimuli. Current Biology 14 5 (2004) 418-423
5. Andrews T.J., and Purves D. Similarities in normal and binocularly rivalrous viewing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 94 18 (1997) 9905-9908
6. Blake R. A neural theory of binocular rivalry. Psychological Review 96 1 (1989) 145-167
7. Blake R., and Logothetis N.K. Visual competition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 3 1 (2002) 13-21
8. Blake R., Westendorf D.H., and Overton R. What is suppressed during binocular rivalry?. Perception 9 2 (1980) 223-231
9. Blake R., Yang Y., and Westendorf D. Discriminating binocular fusion from false fusion. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 32 10 (1991) 2821-2825
10. Bonneh Y., Sagi D., and Karni A. A transition between eye and object rivalry determined by stimulus coherence. Vision Research 41 8 (2001) 981-989
11. Boutet I., and Chaudhuri A. Multistability of overlapped face stimuli is dependent upon orientation. Perception 30 (2001) 743-753
12. Bradley A., and Schor C. The role of eye movements and masking in monocular rivalry. Vision Research 28 10 (1988) 1129-1137
13. Breese B.B. On inhibition. Psychological Review 3 1 (1899) 1-67
14. Brouwer G.J., and van Ee R. Endogenous influences on perceptual bistability depend on exogenous stimulus characteristics. Vision Research 46 20 (2006) 3393-3402
15. Carlson T.A., and He S. Competing global representations fail to initiate binocular rivalry. Neuron 43 6 (2004) 907-914
16. Crassini B., and Broerse J. Monocular rivalry occurs without eye movements. Vision Research 22 1 (1982) 203-204
17. Ding J., and Sperling G. A gain-control theory of binocular combination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103 4 (2006) 1141-1146
18. Fox R., and Check R. Independence between binocular rivalry suppression duration and magnitude of suppression. Journal of Experimental Psychology 93 2 (1972) 283-289
19. Freeman A.W. Multistage model for binocular rivalry. Journal of Neurophysiology 94 6 (2005) 4412-4420
20. Georgeson M.A. Eye movements, afterimages and monocular rivalry. Vision Research 24 10 (1984) 1311-1319
21. Georgeson M.A., and Phillips R. Angular selectivity of monocular rivalry: Experiment and computer simulation. Vision Research 20 11 (1980) 1007-1013
22. Graf E.W., Adams W.J., and Lages M. Modulating motion-induced blindness with depth ordering and surface completion. Vision Research 42 25 (2002) 2731-2735
23. Grossmann J.K., and Dobbins A.C. Competition in bistable vision is attribute-specific. Vision Research 46 3 (2006) 285-292
24. Helmholtz, H. (1910-1924). Treatise on Physiological Optics (Vol. 1). Optical Society of America. Translated from the third German edition.
25. Hupe J., and Rubin N. The dynamics of bi-stable alternation in ambiguous motion displays: A fresh look at plaids. Vision Research 43 5 (2003) 531-548
26. Kitterle F.L., and Thomas J. The effects of spatial frequency, orientation, and color upon binocular rivalry and monocular pattern rivalry. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 16 5 (1980) 405-407
27. Knapen T., Paffen C., Kanai R., and van Ee R. Stimulus flicker alters interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Vision Research 47 1 (2007) 1-7
28. Lee S.H., and Blake R. Rival ideas about binocular rivalry. Vision Research 39 8 (1999) 1447-1454
29. Leopold D.A., and Logothetis N.K. Multistable phenomena: Changing views in perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3 7 (1999) 254-264
30. Liu L., Tyler C.W., and Schor C.M. Failure of rivalry at low contrast: Evidence of a suprathreshold binocular summation process. Vision Research 32 8 (1992) 1471-1479
31. Logothetis N.K., Leopold D.A., and Sheinberg D.L. What is rivaling during binocular rivalry?. Nature 380 6575 (1996) 621-624
32. Maier A., Logothetis N.K., and Leopold D.A. Global competition dictates local suppression in pattern rivalry. Journal of Vision 5 9 (2005) 668-677
33. Mapperson B., and Lovegrove W. Spatial frequency and orientation specificity of simultaneous and successive inhibition on monocular rivalry. Vision Research 18 10 (1978) 1461-1463
34. Ooi T.L., and He Z.J. Binocular rivalry and surface-boundary processing. Perception 35 5 (2006) 581-603
35. O′Shea R.P., Sims A.J., and Govan D.G. The effect of spatial frequency and field size on the spread of exclusive visibility in binocular rivalry. Vision Research 37 2 (1997) 175-183
36. Paffen C.L.E., Alais D., and Verstraten F.A.J. Center-surround inhibition deepens binocular rivalry suppression. Vision Research 45 20 (2005) 2642-2649
37. Pearson J., and Clifford C.W.G. When your brain decides what you see: Grouping across monocular, binocular, and stimulus rivalry. Psychological Science 16 7 (2005) 516-519
38. Sengpiel F., and Vorobyov V. Intracortical origins of interocular suppression in the visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 25 27 (2005) 6394-6400
39. Shimojo S., and Nakayama K. Real world occlusion constraints and binocular rivalry. Vision Research 30 1 (1990) 69-80
40. Thomas J. Binocular rivalry: The effects of orientation and pattern color arrangement. Perception & Psychophysics 23 4 (1978) 360-362
41. van Dam L.C.J., and van Ee R. Retinal image shifts, but not eye movements per se, cause alternations in awareness during binocular rivalry. Journal of Vision 6 11 (2006) 1172-1179
42. van Ee R., van Dam L.C.J., and Erkelens C.J. Bi-stability in perceived slant when binocular disparity and monocular perspective specify different slants. Journal of Vision 2 9 (2002) 597-607
43. Wade N.J. Monocular and binocular rivalry between contours. Perception 4 1 (1975) 85-95
44. Wheatstone C. Contributions to the physiology of vision. Part the first. On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phænomena of binocular vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 128 (1838) 371-394
45. Wilson H.R. Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100 24 (2003) 14499-14503