The composition of fine fragrances is changing

Contact Dermatitis

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 130-132

  Rastogi, Suresh C ^a   Menné, Torkil ^b   Johansen, Jeanne Duus ^b  

^a Natl Environ Research Institute   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Exposure; Fine fragrances; Fragrance allergy

Indexed keywords

CONTACT ALLERGEN; FRAGRANCE; PERFUME;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTACT ALLERGY; EXPOSURE; MARKET; PATCH TEST;

CHEMISTRY, PHARMACEUTICAL; DENMARK; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; HUMANS; INDUSTRY; PERFUME;

EID: 0038182555     PISSN: 01051873     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2003.00035.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Nielsen N H, Linneberg A, Menne T et al. Allergic contact sensitization in an adult Danish population: two cross-sectional surveys eight years apart (the Copenhagen Allergy Study). Acta Derm Venereol 2001: 81: 31-34.
2. Johansen J, Menné T, Christophersen J, Kaaber K, Veien N. Changes in the pattern of sensitization to common contact allergens in Denmark between 1985 and 86 and 1997-1998 with a special view to the effect of preventive strategies. Br J Dermatol 2000: 142: 490-495.
3. Frosch P J, Pilz B, Andersen K E et al. Patch testing with fragrances. Results from a multi-centre study of the European Environmental and Contact Dermatitis Group with 48 frequently used constituents of perfumes. Contact Dermatitis 1995: 32: 333-342.
4. Rastogi S C, Johansen J D, Frosch P J et al. Deodorants on the European market: quantitative chemical analysis of 21 fragrances. Contact Dermatitis 1998: 38: 29-35.
5. Johansen J D, Rastogi S C, Menné T. Contact allergy to popular perfumes; assessed by patch test, use test and chemical analysis. Br J Dermatol 1996: 135: 419-422.
6. White I. Fragrances - future aspects. In: Frosch P J, Johansen J D, White I R, eds. Fragrances - Beneficial and Adverse Effects. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1998:216-223.
7. SCCNFP. Opinion concerning fragrance allergy in consumers. A review of the problem. Analysis of the need for appropriate consumer information and identification of consumer allergens. Adopted by the SCCNFP during the plenary session of 8 December, 1999. The Scientific Committee on Cosmetic Products and Non-Food Products intended for consumers, 1999.
8. American Academy of Dermatology. Position Statement on the chemical identity of fragrances. Approved by Executive Committee 9/98. American Academy of Dermatology, 1998.
9. IFRA. Guideline on the safe use of Isoeugenol. Code of practice. International Fragrance Association, Geneva. May 1980 with amendments 1992 and 1998. Geneva: IFRA, 1998.
10. IFRA. Guideline on the safe use of oak moss extracts. Code of Practice. International Fragrance Association. Geneva. September, 1988, last amended April, 2000. Geneva: IFRA, 2000.
11. Rastogi S C. Analysis of fragrances in cosmetics by gas chromatography - mass spectrometry. J High Resol Chromatogr 1995: 18: 653-658.
12. Groom N. Parfums. Le guide de reference des seuteurs les plus raffinées du monde. Courbevois, France: Editions Soline, 1999.
13. Frosch P J, Johansen J D, Menné T et al. Further importnat sensitizers in patients sensitive to fragrances. Contact Dermatitis 2002: 47: 78-85.
14. Geier J, Brasch J, Schnuch A, Lessmann H, Pirker C, Frosch P J. Lyral has been included in the patch test standard series in Germany. Contact Dermatitis 2002: 46: 295-297.
15. Larsen W G. How to test for fragrance allergy. Cutis 2000: 65: 39-41.