Evolutionary mode and functional divergence of vertebrate NMDA receptor subunit 2 genes

PLoS ONE

Volumn 5, Issue 10, 2010, Pages

  Teng, Huajing ^a   Cai, Wanshi ^b   Zhou, LingLin ^b   Zhang, Jing ^a   Liu, Qi ^b   Wang, Yongqing ^a   Dai, Wei ^a   Zhao, Mei ^a   Sun, Zhongsheng ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF PSYCHOLOGY   (China)

^b WENZHOU MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; IONOTROPIC RECEPTOR; N METHYL DEXTRO ASPARTIC ACID RECEPTOR 2A; N METHYL DEXTRO ASPARTIC ACID RECEPTOR 2B; N METHYL DEXTRO ASPARTIC ACID RECEPTOR 2C; N METHYL DEXTRO ASPARTIC ACID RECEPTOR 2D; N METHYL DEXTRO ASPARTIC ACID RECEPTOR 2D 1; N METHYL DEXTRO ASPARTIC ACID RECEPTOR 2D 2; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; N METHYL DEXTRO ASPARTIC ACID RECEPTOR;

AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; CHICKEN; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXON; FUNCTIONAL GENOMICS; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE FUNCTION; GENE LOCATION; GENETIC CONSERVATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HUMAN; HUMAN VERSUS ANIMAL COMPARISON; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NATURAL SELECTION; NONHUMAN; ORYZIAS; PARALOGY; PHYLOGENETIC TREE; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PUFFER FISH; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; SYNTENY; ANIMAL; CLASSIFICATION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; PHYLOGENY; VERTEBRATE;

ORYZIINAE; TAKIFUGU; VERTEBRATA;

ANIMALS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; EXONS; HUMANS; PHYLOGENY; RECEPTORS, N-METHYL-D-ASPARTATE; SELECTION, GENETIC; VERTEBRATES;

EID: 78149454649     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013342     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Burrell BD, Sahley CL (2001) Learning in simple systems. Curr Opin Neurobiol 11: 757-764.
2. Malenka RC, Bear MF (2004) LTP and LTD: an embarrassment of riches. Neuron 44: 5-21.
3. Bliss TV, Collingridge GL (1993) A synaptic model of memory: long-term potentiation in the hippocampus. Nature 361: 31-39.
4. Falls WA, Miserendino MJ, Davis M (1992) Extinction of fear-potentiated startle: blockade by infusion of an NMDA antagonist into the amygdala. J Neurosci 12: 854-863.
5. Tsien JZ, Huerta PT, Tonegawa S (1996) The essential role of hippocampal CA1 NMDA receptor-dependent synaptic plasticity in spatial memory. Cell 87: 1327-1338.
6. Tang YP, Shimizu E, Dube GR, Rampon C, Kerchner GA, et al. (1999) Genetic enhancement of learning and memory in mice. Nature 401: 63-69.
7. Niewoehner B, Single FN, Hvalby O, Jensen V, Meyer zum Alten Borgloh S, et al. (2007) Impaired spatial working memory but spared spatial reference memory following functional loss of NMDA receptors in the dentate gyrus. Eur J Neurosci 25: 837-846.
8. Nakanishi S (1992) Molecular diversity of glutamate receptors and implications for brain function. Science 258: 597-603.
9. Monyer H, Sprengel R, Schoepfer R, Herb A, Higuchi M, et al. (1992) Heteromeric NMDA receptors: molecular and functional distinction of subtypes. Science 256: 1217-1221.
10. Laube B, Hirai H, Sturgess M, Betz H, Kuhse J (1997) Molecular determinants of agonist discrimination by NMDA receptor subunits: analysis of the glutamate binding site on the NR2B subunit. Neuron 18: 493-503.
11. Stern P, Behe P, Schoepfer R, Colquhoun D (1992) Single-channel conductances of NMDA receptors expressed from cloned cDNAs: comparison with native receptors. Proc Biol Sci 250: 271-277.
12. Kornau HC, Schenker LT, Kennedy MB, Seeburg PH (1995) Domain interaction between NMDA receptor subunits and the postsynaptic density protein PSD-95. Science 269: 1737-1740.
13. Niethammer M, Kim E, Sheng M (1996) Interaction between the C terminus of NMDA receptor subunits and multiple members of the PSD-95 family of membrane-associated guanylate kinases. J Neurosci 16: 2157-2163.
14. Sprengel R, Suchanek B, Amico C, Brusa R, Burnashev N, et al. (1998) Importance of the intracellular domain of NR2 subunits for NMDA receptor function in vivo. Cell 92: 279-289.
15. Ryan TJ, Emes RD, Grant SG, Komiyama NH (2008) Evolution of NMDA receptor cytoplasmic interaction domains: implications for organisation of synaptic signalling complexes. BMC Neurosci 9: 6.
16. Haldane JBS (1932) The causes of evolution. London, New York [etc.]: Longmans, Green and co. vii, 234, [231] p. p.
17. Ohno S (1970) Evolution by gene duplication. New York: Springer-Verlag. xv, 160 p. p.
18. Taylor JS, Raes J (2004) Duplication and divergence: the evolution of new genes and old ideas. Annu Rev Genet 38: 615-643.
19. Vandepoele K, De Vos W, Taylor JS, Meyer A, Van de Peer Y (2004) Major events in the genome evolution of vertebrates: paranome age and size differ considerably between ray-finned fishes and land vertebrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 1638-1643.
20. Christoffels A, Koh EG, Chia JM, Brenner S, Aparicio S, et al. (2004) Fugu genome analysis provides evidence for a whole-genome duplication early during the evolution of ray-finned fishes. Mol Biol Evol 21: 1146-1151.
21. Jaillon O, Aury JM, Brunet F, Petit JL, Stange-Thomann N, et al. (2004) Genome duplication in the teleost fish Tetraodon nigroviridis reveals the early vertebrate proto-karyotype. Nature 431: 946-957.
22. Woods IG, Wilson C, Friedlander B, Chang P, Reyes DK, et al. (2005) The zebrafish gene map defines ancestral vertebrate chromosomes. Genome Res 15: 1307-1314.
23. Amores A, Force A, Yan YL, Joly L, Amemiya C, et al. (1998) Zebrafish hox clusters and vertebrate genome evolution. Science 282: 1711-1714.
24. Finn RN, Kristoffersen BA (2007) Vertebrate vitellogenin gene duplication in relation to the "3R hypothesis": correlation to the pelagic egg and the oceanic radiation of teleosts. PLoS One 2: e169.
25. (2004) Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution. Nature 432: 695-716.
26. von Schantz M, Jenkins A, Archer SN (2006) Evolutionary history of the vertebrate period genes. J Mol Evol 62: 701-707.
27. Murphy WJ, Larkin DM, Everts-van der Wind A, Bourque G, Tesler G, et al. (2005) Dynamics of mammalian chromosome evolution inferred from multispecies comparative maps. Science 309: 613-617.
28. Meyer A, Schartl M (1999) Gene and genome duplications in vertebrates: the one-to-four (-to-eight in fish) rule and the evolution of novel gene functions. Curr Opin Cell Biol 11: 699-704.
29. Friedman R, Hughes AL (2003) The temporal distribution of gene duplication events in a set of highly conserved human gene families. Mol Biol Evol 20: 154-161.
30. Dehal P, Boore JL (2005) Two rounds of whole genome duplication in the ancestral vertebrate. PLoS Biol 3: e314.
31. Ohno S (1999) Gene duplication and the uniqueness of vertebrate genomes circa 1970-1999. Semin Cell Dev Biol 10: 517-522.
32. Holland PW (1999) Gene duplication: past, present and future. Semin Cell Dev Biol 10: 541-547.
33. Olinski RP, Lundin LG, Hallbook F (2006) Conserved synteny between the Ciona genome and human paralogons identifies large duplication events in the molecular evolution of the insulin-relaxin gene family. Mol Biol Evol 23: 10-22.
34. Kasahara M, Naruse K, Sasaki S, Nakatani Y, Qu W, et al. (2007) The medaka draft genome and insights into vertebrate genome evolution. Nature 447: 714-719.
35. Wang W, Zhong J, Su B, Zhou Y, Wang YQ (2007) Comparison of Pax1/9 locus reveals 500-Myr-old syntenic block and evolutionary conserved noncoding regions. Mol Biol Evol 24: 784-791.
36. Taylor JS, Braasch I, Frickey T, Meyer A, Van de Peer Y (2003) Genome duplication, a trait shared by 22000 species of ray-finned fish. Genome Res 13: 382-390.
37. Wang H (2008) Comparative analysis of period genes in teleost fish genomes. J Mol Evol 67: 29-40.
38. Wang H, Kesinger JW, Zhou Q, Wren JD, Martin G, et al. (2008) Identification and characterization of zebrafish ocular formation genes. Genome 51: 222-235.
39. Frazer KA, Elnitski L, Church DM, Dubchak I, Hardison RC (2003) Crossspecies sequence comparisons: a review of methods and available resources. Genome Res 13: 1-12.
40. Ohta T (1989) Role of gene duplication in evolution. Genome 31: 304-310.
41. Kutsuwada T, Sakimura K, Manabe T, Takayama C, Katakura N, et al. (1996) Impairment of suckling response, trigeminal neuronal pattern formation, and hippocampal LTD in NMDA receptor epsilon 2 subunit mutant mice. Neuron 16: 333-344.
42. Sakimura K, Kutsuwada T, Ito I, Manabe T, Takayama C, et al. (1995) Reduced hippocampal LTP and spatial learning in mice lacking NMDA receptor epsilon 1 subunit. Nature 373: 151-155.
43. Ebralidze AK, Rossi DJ, Tonegawa S, Slater NT (1996) Modification of NMDA receptor channels and synaptic transmission by targeted disruption of the NR2C gene. J Neurosci 16: 5014-5025.
44. Kadotani H, Hirano T, Masugi M, Nakamura K, Nakao K, et al. (1996) Motor discoordination results from combined gene disruption of the NMDA receptor NR2A and NR2C subunits, but not from single disruption of the NR2A or NR2C subunit. J Neurosci 16: 7859-7867.
45. Ito H, Ishikawa Y, Yoshimoto M, Yamamoto N (2007) Diversity of brain morphology in teleosts: brain and ecological niche. Brain Behav Evol 69: 76-86.
46. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22: 4673-4680.
47. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S (2007) MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol 24: 1596-1599.
48. Gu X (1999) Statistical methods for testing functional divergence after gene duplication. Mol Biol Evol 16: 1664-1674.
49. Gu X, Vander Velden K (2002) DIVERGE: phylogeny-based analysis for functional-structural divergence of a protein family. Bioinformatics 18: 500-501.
50. Finn RD, Tate J, Mistry J, Coggill PC, Sammut SJ, et al. (2008) The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res 36: D281-288.
51. Yang Z, Swanson WJ (2002) Codon-substitution models to detect adaptive evolution that account for heterogeneous selective pressures among site classes. Mol Biol Evol 19: 49-57.
52. Suzuki Y, Gojobori T (1999) A method for detecting positive selection at single amino acid sites. Mol Biol Evol 16: 1315-1328.
53. Pond SL, Frost SD (2005) Datamonkey: rapid detection of selective pressure on individual sites of codon alignments. Bioinformatics 21: 2531-2533.