Neural network modeling and an uncertainty analysis in Bayesian framework: A case study from the KTB borehole site

Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth

Volumn 115, Issue 10, 2010, Pages

  Maiti, Saumen ^a   Tiwari, Ram Krishna ^b  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF GEOMAGNETISM   (India)

^b Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; DATA SET; DEEP DRILLING; KTB BOREHOLE; LITHOFACIES; MODELING; PROBABILITY; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 78049494432     PISSN: 21699313     EISSN: 21699356     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2010JB000864     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Aires, F. (2004), Neural network uncertainty assessment using Bayesian statistics with application to remote sensing: 1. Network weights, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D10303, doi:10.1029/2003JD004173. (Pubitemid 39102692)
2. Aristodemou, E., C. Pain, C. Oliveira, and T. Goddard (2005), Inversion of nuclear well-logging data using neural networks, Geophys. Prospect., 53, 103-120.
3. Baldwin, J., A. R. M. Bateman, and C. L. Wheatley (1990), Application of neural network to the problem of mineral identification from well logs, Log Anal., 31, 279-293.
4. Benaouda, D., G. Wadge, R. B. Whitmarsh, R. G. Rothwell, and C. MacLeod (1999), Inferring the lithology of borehole rocks by applying neural network classifiers to downwhole logs: An example from the Ocean Drilling Program, Geophys. J. Int., 136, 477-491.
5. Berckhemer, H., A. Rauen, H. Winter, H. Kern, A. Kontny, M. Lienert, G. Nover, J. Pohl, T. Popp, A. Schult, J. Zinke, and H. C. Soffel (1997), Petrophysical properties of the 9-km deep crustal section at KTB, J. Geophys. Res., 102 (B8), 18337-18361.
6. Bescoby, D. J., G. C. Cawley, and P. N. Chroston (2006), Enhanced interpretation of magnetic survey data from archaeological sites using artificial neural networks, Geophysics, 71(5), H45-H53.
7. Bishop, C. M. (1995), Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
8. Bosch, M. (1999), Lithologic tomography: From plural geophysical data to lithology estimation, J. Geophys. Res., 104 (B1), 749-766.
9. Bosch, M., and J. McGaughey (2001), Joint inversion of gravity and magnetic data under lithologic constraints, Leading Edge, 20, 877-881.
10. Bosch, M., A. Gullen, and P. Ledru (2001), Lithologic tomography: An application to geophysical data from the Cadomian belt of northern Brittany, France, Tecton., 331, 197-227.
11. Buntine, W. L., and A. S. Weigend (1991), Bayesian back propagation, Complex Syst., 5, 603-643.
12. Busch, J. M., W. G. Fortney, and L. N. Berry (1987), Determination of lithology from well logs by statistical analysis, SPE Form. Eval., 2, 412-418.
13. Calderon-Macias, C., M. K. Sen, and P. L. Stoffa (2000), Artificial neural networks for parameter estimation in geophysics, Geophys. Prosp., 48, 21-47.
14. Coppola, E. A., Jr., A. J. Rana, M. M. Poulton, F. Szidarovszky, and V. W. Uhl (2005), A neural network model for predicting aquifer water level elevations, Ground Water, 43(2), 231-241.
15. Coulibaly, P., F. Anctil, and B. Bobee (2001), Multivariate reservoir inflow forecasting using temporal neural networks, J. Hydrol. Eng., 6, 367-376.
16. Dai, H., and C. Macbeth (1995), Automatic picking of seismic arrivals in local earthquake data using an artificial neural network, Geophys. J. Int., 120, 758-774.
17. Delfiner, P., O. Peyret, and O. Serra (1987), Automatic determination of lithology from well logs, SPE Form. Eval., 2, 303-310.
18. Devilee, R. J. R., A. Curtis, and K. Roy-Chowdhury (1999), An efficient probabilistic neural network approach to solving inverse problems: Inverting surface wave velocities for Eurasian crustal thickness, J. Geophys. Res., 104(12), 28, 841-28, 856.
19. Dystart, P. S., and J. J. Pulli (1990), Regional seismic event classification at the NORESS array: Seismological measurements and use of trained neural network, Bull. Seis. Soc. Am., 80, 1910-1933.
20. Emmermann, R., and J. Lauterjung (1997), The German Continental Deep Drilling Program KTB: Overview and major results, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 18179-18201.
21. Feng, X.-T., M. Seto, and K. Katsuyama (1997), Neural dynamic modeling on earthquake magnitude series, Geophys. J. Int., 128, 547-556.
22. Franke, W. (1989), The geological framework of the KTB drill site, in The German Continental Deep Drilling Program (KTB), edited by R. Emmermann and J. Wohlenberg, pp. 38-54, Springer, Berlin.
23. Fuller, W. A. (1976), Introduction to Statistical Time Series, John Wiley, New York.
24. Gassaway, G. R., D. R. Miller, L. E. Bennett, R. A. Brown, M. Rapp, and V. Nelson (1989), Amplitude variations with offset: Fundamentals and case histories, SEG Continuing Education Course Notes.
25. Helle, H. B., A. Bhatt, and B. Ursin (2001), Porosity and permeability prediction from wireline logs using artificial neural networks: A North Sea case study, Geophys. Prosp., 49, 431-444.
26. Khan, M. S., and P. Coulibaly (2006), Bayesian neural network for rainfallrunoff modeling, Water Resour. Res., 42, W07409, doi:10.1029/ 2005WR003971. (Pubitemid 44300476)
27. Leonardi, S., and H. Kumpel (1998), Variability of geophysical log data and signature of crustal heterogeneities at the KTB, Geophys. J. Int., 135, 964-974.
28. Leonardi, S., and H. Kumpel (1999), Fractal variability in super deep borehole-implications for the signature of crustal heterogeneities, Tectonophysics, 301, 173-181.
29. MacKay, D. J. C. (1992), A practical Bayesian framework for backpropagation networks, Neural Comput., 4(3), 448-472.
30. Maiti, S., and R. K. Tiwari (2009), A hybrid Monte Carlo method based artificial neural networks approach for rock boundaries identification: A case study from the KTB bore hole, Pure Appl. Geophys., 166, 2059-2090, doi:10.1007/s00024-009-0533-y.
31. Maiti, S., and R. K. Tiwari (2010), Automatic discriminations of geophysical signals using the Bayesian neural networks approach, Geophysics, 75(1), E67-E78, doi:10.1190/1.3298501.
32. Maiti, S., R. K. Tiwari, and H. J. Kumpel (2007), Neural network modeling and classification of lithofacies using well log data: A case study from KTB borehole site, Geophys. J. Int., 169, 733-746.
33. McCormack, M. D., D. Zaucha, and D. Dushek (1993), First break refraction event picking and seismic data trace editing using neural networks, Geophysics, 58, 67-78.
34. Meier, U., A. Curtis, and J. Trampert (2007), Global crustal thickness from neural network inversion of surface wave data, Geophys. J. Int., 169, 706-722.
35. Moller, M. (1993), A scaled conjugate gradient algorithm for fast supervised learning, Neural Networks, 6, 525-533.
36. Mosegaard, K., and A. Tarantola (1995), Monte Carlo sampling of solutions to inverse problem, J. Geophys. Res., 100 (B7), 12, 431-12, 447.
37. Murat, M. E., and A. J. Rudman (1992), Automated first arrival picking: A neural network approach, Geophys. Prosp., 40, 587-604.
38. Nabney, I. T. (2004), Netlab Algorithms for Pattern Recognition, Springer, New York.
39. Neal, R. M. (1993), Bayesian learning via stochastic dynamics, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 5, edited by C. L. Giles et al., pp. 475-482, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, Calif.
40. Pechnig, P., S. Haverkamp, J. Wohlenberg, G. Zimmermann, and H. Burkhardt (1997), Integrated interpretation in the German Continental Deep Drilling Program: Lithology, porosity, and fracture zones, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 18, 363-18, 390.
41. Pickett, G. R. (1963), Acoustic character logs and their application in formation evaluation, J. Petr. Tech., 15, 659-667.
42. Poulton, M., (Ed.) (2001), Computational Neural Networks for Geophysical Data Processing, Pergamon, Oxford, U. K.
43. Raiche, A. (1991), A pattern recognition approach to geophysical inversion using neural nets, Geophys. J. Int., 105, 629-648.
44. Rogers, S. J., J. H. Fang, C. L. Karr, and D. A. Stanley (1992), Determination of lithology from well logs using a neural network, AAPG Bull., 76(5), 731-739.
45. Rosenblatt, F. (1958), The perceptron: A probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain, Psychol. Rev., 65, 386-408.
46. Roth, G., and A. Tarantola (1994), Neural networks and inversion of seismic data, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 6753-6768.
47. Rumelhart, D. E., G. E. Hinton, and R. J. Williams (1986), Learning representations by back-propagating errors, Nature, 323, 533-536.
48. Sambridge, M., and K. Mosegaard (2002), Monte Carlo methods in geophysical inverse problems, Rev. Geophys., 40(3), 1009, doi:10.1029/ 2000RG000089.
49. Sen, M. K., and P. Stoffa (1996), Bayesian inference, Gibbs' sampler and uncertainty estimation in geophysical inversion, Geophys. Prospect., 44, 313-350.
50. Spichak, V., and I. Popova (2000), Artificial neural network inversion of Magnetotelluric data in terms of three-dimensional earth macroparameters, Geophys. J. Int., 142, 15-26.
51. Tarantola, A. (1987), Inverse Problem Theory, Elsevier, New York.
52. Tarantola, A. (2006), Popper, Bayes and the inverse problem, Nat. Phys., 492-494.
53. Van der Baan, M., and C. Jutten (2000), Neural networks in geophysical applications, Geophysics, 65, 1032-1047.
54. Walker, A. M. (1969), On the asymptotic behaviour of posterior distributions, J. R. Stat., 31, 80-88.
55. Williams, P. M. (1995), Bayesian regularization and pruning using a Laplace prior, Neural Comput, 7, 117-143.
56. Wolff, M., and J. Pelissier-Combescure (1982), FACIOLOG: Automatic electrofacies determination: SPWLA Annual Logging Symposium paper FF, 6-9.