Artificial neural network inversion of magnetotelluric data in terms of three-dimensional earth macroparameters

Geophysical Journal International

Volumn 142, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 15-26

  Spichak, Vjacheslav ^a   Popova, Irina ^a  

^a RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

3 D inversion; Dyke; Magnetotellurics; Neural network

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; DATA INVERSION; GEOELECTRIC FIELD; MAGNETOTELLURIC METHOD;

EID: 0033937388     PISSN: 0956540X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-246X.2000.00065.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Baum, E. & Haussler, D., 1989. What size net gives valid generalization?, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vol. 1, pp. 81-90, ed. Touretzky, D., Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo, CA.
2. Caudill, M., 1988. Neural networks primer, Part 4, Al Expert, 8, 61-67.
3. Hidalgo, H., Gomez-Trevino, E. & Swinarski, R., 1994. Neural network approximation of an inverse functional, in Proc. IEEE World Congr. on Comput. Intelligence, pp. 3387-3392, Orlando.
4. Kung, S. & Hwang, J., 1988. An algebraic projection analysis for optimal hidden units size and learning rates in backpropagation learning, in 1st Int. Conf, on Neural Networks, IEEE Proc., pp. I-363 370, eds Caudill, M. & Batler, C., SoS Printing, San Diego.
5. Mackie, R.L. & Madden, T.R., 1993. Three-dimensional magnetotelluric inversion using conjugate gradients, J. Geophys., 115, 215-229.
6. Poulton, M. & Birken, R.A., 1998. Estimating one-dimensional models from frequency-domain electromagnetic data using modular neural networks, IEEE Trans. GeoScience and Remote Sensing, 36, 547-559.
7. Poulton, M., Sternberg, B. & Glass, C., 1992a. Neural network pattern recognition of subsurface EM images, J. appl. Geophys., 29, 21-36.
8. Poulton, M., Stemberg, B. & Glass, C., 1992b. Location of subsurface targets in geophysical data using neural networks, Geophysics, 57, 1534-1544.
9. Raiche, A., 1991. A pattern recognition approach to geophysical inversion using neural networks, Geophys. J. Int., 105, 629-648.
10. Rumelhart, D., Mcclelland, J. & the PDP Research Group, 1988. Parallel Distributed Processing, Vol. 1, MIT Press, Cambridge.
11. Schiffman, W., Joost, M. & Werner, R., 1992. Optimization of the backpropagation algorithm for training multilayer perceptrons, Technical report, Institute of Physics, University of Koblenz.
12. Schmidhuber, J., 1989. Accelerated learning in back-propagation nets, in Connectionism in Perspective, pp. 439-445, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
13. Sen, M.K., Bhattacharya, B.B. & Stoffa, P.L., 1993. Nonlinear inversion of resistivity sounding data, Geophysics, 58, 496-507.
14. Silva, F.M. & Almeida, L.B., 1990. Speeding up backpropagation, in Advanced Neural Computers, pp. 151-158, ed. Eckmiller, R.
15. Soulie, F., Gallinari, P., Le, C. & Thiria, S., 1987. Evaluation of neural network architectures on test learning tasks, in 1st Int. Conf. on Neural Networks, IEEE Proc., II-653-660, eds Caudill, M. & Batler, C., SoS Printing, San Diego.
16. Spichak, V.V., 1983. The FDM3D software package for the numerical modeling of 3D electromagnetic fields, in Algoritmy i Programmy Resheniya Pryamykh i Obratnykh Zadachakh Elektromagnitnoi Induktsii v Zemle (Algorithms and Programs for the Calculation and Inversion of the Electromagnetic Fields in the Earth), pp. 58-68, ed. Zhdanov, M., Izmiran, Moscow (in Russian).
17. Spichak, V.V., 1990. A general approach to the EM data interpretation using an expert system, in Proc. X Workshop on EM Induction in the Earth, Ensenada, Mexico.
18. Spichak, V.V., 1999. Magnitotelluricheskie Polja v Trekhmernikh Geoelektricheskikh Modeljakh (Magnetotelluric Fields in 3D Geoelectrical Models), Scientific World, Moscow (in Russian).
19. Spichak, V., Menville, M. & Roussignol, M., 1995. Three-dimensional inversion of the magnetotelluric fields using Bayesian statistics, in Proc. Schlumberger Doll Research Symp. on 3D Electromagnetics, pp. 347-358, eds Spies, B. & Oristaglio, M., Ridgefield, USA.
20. Spichak, V., Fukuoka, K., Kobayashi, T., Mogi, T., Popova, I. & Shima, H., 1999. Neural networked based interpretation of insufficient and noisy MT data in terms of the target macroparameters, in Proc. 2nd Int. Symp, on 3D Electromagnetics, pp. 297-300, eds Wannamaker, P. & Zhdanov, M., Salt Lake City.
21. Stratton, J.A., 1941. Electromagnetic Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York.
22. d by linear combination of shifted rotation of a sigmoid function with and without scaling, Neural Networks, 4, 817-826.
23. Zhdanov, M.S. & Spichak, V.V., 1992. Matematicheskoe Modelirovanie Elektromagnitnykh Polei v Trekhmerno Neodnorodnykh Sredakh (Mathematical Modeling of Electromagnetic Fields in 3D Inhomogeneous Media), Nauka, Moscow (in Russian).